I'm sorry, but that's BS to bring up his stats from last season where you only had a 24 game sample size and he was still recovering from his injury. I'm also not the biggest advanced stats person at all. That fan purposely brought out those stats to nitpick how "bad" LaVine is. Some advanced stats are flawed because you're heavily affected by playing on a crapty team. I'm going to use those same exact stats to show you how silly it is to draw conclusions from them.
Look at Fox's rookie year.
By all these advanced stats, it would tell you Fox was not only the worst rookie in the NBA, but also one of the worst players in the NBA last year. Would you seriously draw any of these conclusions from what we saw this year? That's freaking laughable.
- He was 95/99 in RPM among all PGs at -4.27
- Carmelo projects Fox as a project, and he was one of the worst players in history last year according to their stats. As a matter of fact, his worth last year was -19.7million His worth next year is -6million
- BBref has Fox's VORP ranked 539/540 among all NBA players.
In LaVine's case, it's a 24 game sample size. It's his first games coming off his surgery and rehab. He's playing on a very bad team. I wish I had an account to tell that person off.
Yeah I thought Fox was awful last year. Like one of the worst full time players I've ever seen. Normally guys that are as bad as him wind up getting sent down to the G League or they get released or ride the bench. The Kings played him despite how bad he was which was the right thing to do last year. The wrong thing was Joerger never putting him in situations where he could succeed. Nearly everything about the offense was anti-Fox. De'Aaron showed me more in that one summer league game the other day than he did nearly all last season. The tools he used driving to the basket in that game are tools that he can build a career on. But as far as scouting Fox, people concentrate way too much on his 4 or 5 clutch shots, his 6 for 6 3pt display and a few of his euro steps while ignoring the other 99% of his minutes which were extremely bad.
https://www.basketball-reference.co...comp=gt&c1val=-4&order_by=vorp&order_by_asc=Y
This is a list of the worst VORP seasons for players 27 and under. Fox's rookie year is 80th on the list. LaVine's is 82nd. Look at the list and tell me how many great players are on this list? It's full of busts, guys that never even got close to their potential and career role players. It's not impossible for a guy on this list to become an outlier and actually wind up being a good player in the future, but the odds are really low. The odds are very low for just Fox to become a good player but now people want to add another player from this list to the Kings? Now the odds are exponentially low. Try going to the next page and taking a look. Again, it's full of bad players with a couple decent players sprinkled in.
LaVine's metrics are not good. Even for a bad team. He does not play winning basketball and even a career year for him is equal to about an average starter on an average team. His athleticism and numbers are eye opening but his actual effect on basketball games is nil.