It "improved" because his previous season was embarrassingly bad. He's still a well-below average shooter on everything but the set 3.
We need at least two more guys who can be that "embarrassingly bad."
It "improved" because his previous season was embarrassingly bad. He's still a well-below average shooter on everything but the set 3.
It "improved" because his previous season was embarrassingly bad. He's still a well-below average shooter on everything but the set 3.
If another team really wants him they're going to offer 12+/yr, maybe more. Anything less than that and they have to know we'll match.
Why would anybody pay this guy 12 million a year ?
Based on what ? His rookie season and his potential ? He was in a bad system, etc, etc,.... Please. We know what Tyreke is, and what he isn't. So does the rest of the league. Nobody is giving him 12 million, and if somebody is stupid enough to do that, you simply walk away shaking your head.
4 years, 38 million.
That's fair, anything above that and you're overpaying.
1. We better not commit anywhere near 50 million on him
2. If we are anywhere close to 50 million, we better have him in a 5 year deal with the 5th year as a team option.
So let's see if I have it straight... Some of you don't want to pay Reke more than $8.5m/yr but you're conceding there are teams out there that will likely throw more at him? Why on earth would they do that if he is, as some think, the vast disappointment with limited skills?
Sorry, but we need to match any legitimate offer if we want to have any credibility in the league. If we don't, we're no better off than we were with the Maloofs.
Who is conceding that? Look at any top free agent lists, is he there? Which teams that have cap space have a need for him in terms of positional need and/or salary structure at top dollar? Personally I think he will literally be in a position to take whatever we give him, and what we give him will be in good faith
Yes, he is. It will take me a while to find it, and I'm too tired tonight, but he's listed in the top 10 of free agents of at least one list that I saw.
You posted it here, I saw it.. He was sandwiched between JJ Hickson and OJ Mayo, which I think typifies what many view as the market he'll face
Why would anybody pay this guy 12 million a year ?
Based on what ? His rookie season and his potential ? He was in a bad system, etc, etc,.... Please. We know what Tyreke is, and what he isn't. So does the rest of the league. Nobody is giving him 12 million, and if somebody is stupid enough to do that, you simply walk away shaking your head.
4 years, 38 million.
That's fair, anything above that and you're overpaying.
1. We better not commit anywhere near 50 million on him
2. If we are anywhere close to 50 million, we better have him in a 5 year deal with the 5th year as a team option.
I hope we keep Tyreke without overpaying....dude is good and still has loads of potential. But, jump shot where art thou? I don't wanna still be hoping every offseason that Tyreke comes in with a better shot. Put it all together man!!! Please...lol
edit: btw, I know Tyreke has been improving.....I just want to see him really put it all together. Hopefully the new coaching staff can bring the most out of him. Coach Smart was terrible for Reke.....terrible for the whole team. In fact I shall never repeat that name again haha.
Lets all try to remember that its not about what Tyreke is worth. Its about what his market value is. For example, his services may only be worth 8 million but his market value may be 10 million. Players are generally paid their market value which tends to be more than what theyre actually worth. If we wish to be competitive we have to play the market value game.
I get confused about that too. I think you're right though. There is a market value and a player worth. The market value, depending on the year or the circumstances, could be a lot higher than a players worth, and that should be considered.
Only in extreme cases, because of this:
The Kings can't replace him. They might have signed 1 free agent in team history at his level, and maybe not even that. Certainly none at his potential level. So when you start nitpicking around ooh $9.5mil or $10.5mil for a small market team like the Kings, you are really almost talking about option #1 being maybe overpaying by $2mil, vs. option #2 being losing a $9mil asset for nothing. If you're the Lakers, you can play that game and just sign another $9mil asset next year. If you're the Kings, you have never shown that ability, so you keep all the talent you happen to get your hands on, and if you really don't want it, you can trade it for more assets in the future. If you live in a rainforest you can waste all the water you want. If you live in a desert you have to retain, conserve, and recycle every drop.
Only in extreme cases, because of this:
The Kings can't replace him. They might have signed 1 free agent in team history at his level, and maybe not even that. Certainly none at his potential level. So when you start nitpicking around ooh $9.5mil or $10.5mil for a small market team like the Kings, you are really almost talking about option #1 being maybe overpaying by $2mil, vs. option #2 being losing a $9mil asset for nothing. If you're the Lakers, you can play that game and just sign another $9mil asset next year. If you're the Kings, you have never shown that ability, so you keep all the talent you happen to get your hands on, and if you really don't want it, you can trade it for more assets in the future. If you live in a rainforest you can waste all the water you want. If you live in a desert you have to retain, conserve, and recycle every drop.
check out a Tweet that Tyreke's brother retweeted.
Gabe Hernandez @GHernandez916
@Bluprintceo Reke going to retire a @SacramentoKings!!
#PrintDat
Retweeted by INTERNATIONAL i
Only in extreme cases, because of this:
The Kings can't replace him. They might have signed 1 free agent in team history at his level, and maybe not even that. Certainly none at his potential level. So when you start nitpicking around ooh $9.5mil or $10.5mil for a small market team like the Kings, you are really almost talking about option #1 being maybe overpaying by $2mil, vs. option #2 being losing a $9mil asset for nothing. If you're the Lakers, you can play that game and just sign another $9mil asset next year. If you're the Kings, you have never shown that ability, so you keep all the talent you happen to get your hands on, and if you really don't want it, you can trade it for more assets in the future. If you live in a rainforest you can waste all the water you want. If you live in a desert you have to retain, conserve, and recycle every drop.
tyreke is a very good player just remember with the horrible coaching we have had.. he hasnt even had a system to run.
Lets all try to remember that its not about what Tyreke is worth. Its about what his market value is. For example, his services may only be worth 8 million but his market value may be 10 million. Players are generally paid their market value which tends to be more than what theyre actually worth. If we wish to be competitive we have to play the market value game.
For any stretch of games do you feel he had been used correctly over the past 4 years? Just curious because the whole "bad coaching" is kind of a blanket statement.
no i think tyreke is a pg in the league not traditional but with his ability to take ppl. off the dribble he can get in the lane with a number of moves & dish to ppl. or finish that what he does best. get shooters around him and let cousins man help off the drive and bam easy and1 for cousins..
put evans in a spurs type offense and he could be deadly
For any stretch of games do you feel he had been used correctly over the past 4 years? Just curious because the whole "bad coaching" is kind of a blanket statement.
Fair enough.
I feel he should be used differently and I feel that there were times when Smart (as well as other coaches we had) had used him correctly. I just don't think he has the court vision to get others consistently involved if he were to play PG. It's easy to say he drives and dishes it off to open shooters, but from what I have seen a lot of, he will take a difficult shot in traffic over passing it to someone that is open. He's been a lot better recently but I would like to see him playing a few minutes here and there as a PG before they try to put him back full time.