Tyreke Evans(lets have an honest conversation)

What is Tyreke's ceiling

  • Tier #1

    Votes: 11 15.3%
  • Tier #2

    Votes: 37 51.4%
  • Tier #3

    Votes: 15 20.8%
  • none of the above

    Votes: 9 12.5%

  • Total voters
    72
  • Poll closed .

jcwkings

All-Star
Ok so I really want to know how this community views Tyreke Evans as a player since ive seen a lot of backlash about drafting McLemore, the main arguement being that we already have Tyreke, which I personally find absurd. Where does board see the max potential of Tyreke Evans given what we have seen from him the last 4 seasons. I do not want this to turn into a should we re-sign him or not arguement, i think we all want him back, i just think there are some people on here with ridiculously unrealistic views of what Evans can be. I understand that it must have been hard for Tyreke, dealing with the constant carousale of coaches, crappy owners, which is why i want him back, to see what changes now that we have a stable situation. To me Tyreke Evans is still in a promosing talent level, but basically when players reach their prime (should be by age 25-32) giving them seven years or so of prime basketball. So saying that Evans is basically 2 seasons away from "being what he will always be". Lets look at how i view tiers of players in the league

Tier #1- Elite Superstars

These players are the best of the best and generally share the same or similar traits, having one of these players completely alters your franchise, in most cases almost instantly, if not after 1 or 2 seasons. Common traits from this tier, are Elite Basketball IQ and understanding of the game, Elite competitiveness/will to win, Elite athletic ability, immense overall skill level, great defensive prowess, a player that clearly makes his teammates better. To be clear you don't need absolutely all of these to be in this tier.

Modern Examples: Lebron James, Kobe Bryant, Chris Paul, Kevin Durant, Dwayne Wade( a few years ago), Pre-injury Derrick Rose(imo), Tim Duncan(prime), Kevin Garnett(prime), Dirk(championship season)

Tier #2 Perrenial All Stars

These players are the guys that make anywhere from 5-10 all star appearances throughout their career, like the elite superstars they share a lot of the same traits, but may have limitations that ever let them reaching the absolute elite level, these players are still hall of famers, but generally are not going to be thought of as the #1 guy on their team with a few exceptions.

Modern Examples: Deron Williams, Steve Nash, Dirk(rest of career), Paul Pierce, Ray Allen, Dwight Howard, Tracy McGrady (prime), Yao Ming, Chris Webber, Tony Parker

Tier #3 All Star

These players make 2-5 all star appearances throughout their career, they usually have 1 or 2 skills that are elite level, but also have glaring weaknesses that will ever let them become absolute key parts of a championship or competitive team. These guys are most likely to be 3rd options on a championship team, and 2nd options on a competitive/average team. They lack many of the characteristics that the 2 levels above have, but are so good at one or two aspects of their game, they make great careers for themselves.

Modern Examples: Andre Igoudala, Peja Stojakovic, Pau Gasol, Chris Bosh, Chauncy Billups, Manu Ginobli


Below this are guys that may make one all star appearance, or guys that have solid 10-12 year careers, not hall of famers, but guys that will always be remembered, usually specialists at something.

So lets honestly analyze Tyreke Evans now and see where his potential is

Athletic Ability- Tyreke isn't an elite athlete, he is however a good athlete with a great build, deceptively quick especially in the open floor. Physically he is a gifted specimen, athletically he is average for an NBA player.

Skill Level- Tyreke's basketball skills vary, his ball handling is probably at an Elite level, especially for a 6'5 SG. His shooting is very erratic. He has improved his set 3 pt shot just this last season which is good. However his off the dribble jumpshooting(most important if you're talking about an ball dominant guard) is downright bad and i have honestly seen little to no improvement in his four seasons with us. Tyreke also hasn't added any kind of runners, flip shots, tear drops to his game in his four seasons. Tyreke is a very good finisher around the rim, while he isn't athletic enough to dunk over defenders, his craftyness allows him to produce nifty finishes around the rim that do dazzle. However because he doesn't have any runners, or other short shot variants in his game, he becomes exteremely predictable, Tyreke's goal off the dribble is to get to the rim, there is no in between, however he does show the potential of being able to find open shooters after drawing in defenses.

Basketball IQ- Evans has average to good basketball IQ, he shows a good understanding of the game, at an iso individual level. At a team level is where his flaws start to show. Evans does not show the capacity to run a basketball team, he has looked lost in many occasions when given the duties of setting up the offense or crunch time execution. Defensively he has great instincts at an individual level, if a team is running an iso for a SG, i want Tyreke guarding him. At a team level he has shown instances of being lost defensively, things like playing too loosely on good shooters, over gambling, getting lost on switches. These are things that can be attributed to bad coaching however, and just our team being a terrible defensive team in general. However defense starts with your stars, and Tyreke needs to assume the responsibility.

Competitiveness/Leadership/Fire aka "IT" factor- Here lies what truly separates the greats from legends, good players from great players. I'm sorry to say Tyreke absolutely hasn't shown these traits for an extended period of time in his four seasons here. This is something you absolutely cant teach someone, they either have it and show it or they don't. Tyreke is a modest guy, which imo works against him, he just doesn't have that "you can't stop me" attitude that the greats show. Tyreke has never shown that "give me the ball, i'm taking us home" attitude the greats show. His confidence fluctuates depending on how good he is playing on that specific game. A great player knows they are great and that he can't be stopped on any night. When Evans has played against a stopper (Tony Allen) he absolutely looks lost in the game. When the team has a great shotblocker, he isn't assertive. This ins't his fault, his skill and athletic level isn't at the level where he can just take over against anybody, but fans expect too much of him.


With all this taken into account, imo Tyreke's ceiling is at Tier#3. He absolutely can make a few all star appearances two or three years down the road. Imo he can get there by becoming a defensive stopper first, that gets out on the break and scores in the open court. I have not seen enough from him in a half court setting for me to think a Tyreke Iso is viable on a regular level(certainly viable a few times per game, depending on defensive matchups, and if the other team is playing a good shot blocker). This is from what i have seen in 4 turmoil years, which is why i'm all for giving Evans that "one last chance" under our new organization as the ball dominant player we envision him as. I am comfortable with that because with Cousins is going to be the #1 option on this team. I think Cousins, Evans, McLemore core can work. I see Cousins ceiling at tier #2, Evans at tier #3, McLemore is too young, but his ceiling is Tier#2, with a more likely tier#3. The intagibles are what i want to see from McLemore.
 
We have had enough honest conversations in the last two years that I doubt anything new will be added but I'll bet this thread goes on and on drifting in the same circles with the same contributors saying the same thing as the last two years. Have at it.
 
I'm just so sick of the Tyreke conversations. We'll find out soon enough if the FO believes that Tyreke will be a building block for this team going forward or not. If he leaves...we can stop having these conversations...and if we pay him...then hopefully we can also stop having these conversation when the realization arrives that we're rolling with him.

And the organization did a horrible job last year in regards to IT & Tyreke...to the point that we now have people saying that Tyreke doesn't have the "IT" factor.

Please...let's just see what the FO decides...as we've discussed this topic a 1000 times more than it ever needed to be discussed.
 
Well this is the summer, and lets be honest Tyreke and DMC free agency are absolutely HUGE for the next 5-10 years of this franchise
 
I voted tier 2 but meant to click tier 3. I think he could be an all-star at some point, but not a perennial all-star. Mitch Richmond on the other hand.... Best SG we ever had, and he was a tier 2.
 
Last edited:
Pau Gasol can't be a key part of a championship team?

I debated that where to put Pau, he is a good guy that is debatable between tier 2 and 3. As the #1 guy in Memphis, he took his team to a couple of first round exits, with the Lakers he was the second option, but playing with a tier#1 in his absolute prime. Most teams will not have a tier 1 player, so i don't think Pau is a key part of a championship team if he has another tier 2 player and say a tier 3 player with him. For example i don't see a core of prime Pau, prime steve nash, and prime Igoudala as a championship conteder
 
We have had enough honest conversations in the last two years that I doubt anything new will be added but I'll bet this thread goes on and on drifting in the same circles with the same contributors saying the same thing as the last two years. Have at it.

Totally and completely agree. It seems that almost every single thread on the board turns into a discussion of Tyreke Evans sooner or later.

I'm not adding anything to this except to say that I voted for Tier#2 and that I wish the OP had made the poll public. That would have meant a more "honest" discussion.
 
tier 2, the kinda guy you pair with, say, your elite big man, surrounding both with defensive roleplayers and jump shooters...

Its too hot for this right now. Lets all go out for a drink or something.

one step ahead of you, friend...

;)
 
I'm just so sick of the Tyreke conversations. We'll find out soon enough if the FO believes that Tyreke will be a building block for this team going forward or not. If he leaves...we can stop having these conversations...and if we pay him...then hopefully we can also stop having these conversation when the realization arrives that we're rolling with him.

And the organization did a horrible job last year in regards to IT & Tyreke...to the point that we now have people saying that Tyreke doesn't have the "IT" factor.

Please...let's just see what the FO decides...as we've discussed this topic a 1000 times more than it ever needed to be discussed.

Im fairly certain this is in reference to the word "it" and not our starting PG from last season "Isaiah Thomas"

Who knows with this board though....
 
With regards to the question from the OP..

I would say Tier #3. The most adapt comparison I can think of is a worse shooting Manu Ginobli. Everything else is right there though. Elite penetrator. Rebounds well for a guard Excellent passer and ball-handler for size. Great defender when he wants to be, but inconsistent at times. Not really possessing the mentality of an elite scoring option.
 
The question is what's his ceiling. Well, almost anything is possible, but hitting tier #2 is plausible. Not necessarily the most likely, but absolutely plausible especially if the team starts to contend.
 
With regards to the question from the OP..

I would say Tier #3. The most adapt comparison I can think of is a worse shooting Manu Ginobli. Everything else is right there though. Elite penetrator. Rebounds well for a guard Excellent passer and ball-handler for size. Great defender when he wants to be, but inconsistent at times. Not really possessing the mentality of an elite scoring option.

that last bit i just don't get. tyreke had been oft-criticized at kf.com precisely because he possesses the mentality of an elite scoring option, one that gets to the rim consistently, persistently, and sometimes even recklessly. he's since adapted to the "team concept" (a foolish notion given just how poorly the team around him was constructed these last four seasons), been shoved off-ball, seen his minutes slashed, yet still produced in spite of it all, and now people are saying he doesn't have the mentality to be an elite scorer even though his is a style of play, and an execution of that style of play, that is exclusive to, ya know, elite scorers? man, dude will just never jive with some of you, no matter how he performs...
 
Under Keith Smart he was a Tier 4. Under all other coaches he was a Tier 3. However his rookie season he was a Tier 2.

With a long-tenured coach that moves him back to PG and puts a great shooter next to him, gives him the ability to be a solid Tier 2. He does not have the "it factor" to be a Tier 1 nor the shooting.
 
With regards to the question from the OP..

I would say Tier #3. The most adapt comparison I can think of is a worse shooting Manu Ginobli. Everything else is right there though. Elite penetrator. Rebounds well for a guard Excellent passer and ball-handler for size. Great defender when he wants to be, but inconsistent at times. Not really possessing the mentality of an elite scoring option.

So let's sign and trade reke for Jamaal Crawford, hire Jamaal Mashburn as team president, and trade McLemore for Jamaal Franklin.:cool:
 
Why is it that whenever someone on one side is trying gin up support from like-minded individuals, or browbeat the other side, they always try to couch it under the guise of "honest discussion," or "just asking questions?"

Barring a sudden influx of can't-miss superstars, who are all still currently in the tenth grade, Tyreke Evans will be a Top Five SG in five years, if only due to attrition.
 
Ok so I really want to know how this community views Tyreke Evans as a player since ive seen a lot of backlash about drafting McLemore, the main arguement being that we already have Tyreke, which I personally find absurd.

I'm with you. From what I've read, McLemore is a pretty solid and smart shooter. Someone that doesn't jack up shot but know when to shoot is priceless IMO.

As for Tyreke at this point in time..none. I think he can still be a solid player...just not at an all star level yet until he can shoot. And I have lost faith in him learning to shoot well. I think McLemore could be better than Curry..and if I have to choose between Curry and Evans at this point in time..I would take Curry over Tyreke (shooter over driver).
 
Tier 3. Agree with Op's assesment of Tyreke's game and skills. It did look like he had some leadership and swagger in his rookie year. That disappeared once Cousins started to establish his personality on the team.
 
Can't believe so many people voted Tier 2. He's not in the same class as those guys. He's been in the league for 4 seasons so the whole ceiling thing is just about gone. He'll be better not having to play for Keith Smart but it's not like we have a Ray Allen or prime McGrady being held back by bad coaching. If Tyreke was that good of a player, he'd be dominating regardless of who the coach was or what the offensive scheme was.

I'd group him more with a guy like Caron Butler. He'll get an All Star nod or two eventually and he'll hover between 16-20ppg but he'll never be that go to guy at the end of games unless he develops a step back jumper. If he develops that then he has a chance but at this point he's easy to defend if he has the ball at the end of the game.
 
Last edited:
Can't believe so many people voted Tier 2. He's not in the same class as those guys. He's been in the league for 4 seasons so the whole ceiling thing is just about gone. He'll be better not having to play for Keith Smart but it's not like we have a Ray Allen or prime McGrady being held back by bad coaching. If Tyreke was that good of a player, he'd be dominating regardless of who the coach was or what the offensive scheme was.

That's silly. He is most dominant when he has the ball in his hands. His coach deliberately took him off the ball. What was he supposed to do, steal the ball from IT?

I posted the numbers of the best guards in the last 15 or so years at age 23 a while back. His numbers were under the top tier but very competitive with the next.
 
I think he is one of the top 5 or so players at SG right now. Give him more minutes and more touches and I think he can be an all star.

He doesn't have the requisite athletic ability to be in the first category, though.
 
I think he is one of the top 5 or so players at SG right now. Give him more minutes and more touches and I think he can be an all star.

He doesn't have the requisite athletic ability to be in the first category, though.

Not sure athletic ability is what keeps him out of the first category. As a guard Chris Paul is far from being an excellent athletic specimen but few would argue he isn't at the top.
 
Not sure athletic ability is what keeps him out of the first category. As a guard Chris Paul is far from being an excellent athletic specimen but few would argue he isn't at the top.

Paul is a different type of player though. His game is about orchestrating his team's offense first and foremost. And when he does look for his shot, he is such a great shooter that he doesn't need to explode to the rim and finish in traffic the way a slashing combo guard like Tyreke does.

I also think your underselling Paul. He is one of the quickest players in the league, and I know he can dunk at barely 6' tall.
 
Last edited:
Can't believe so many people voted Tier 2. He's not in the same class as those guys. He's been in the league for 4 seasons so the whole ceiling thing is just about gone. He'll be better not having to play for Keith Smart but it's not like we have a Ray Allen or prime McGrady being held back by bad coaching. If Tyreke was that good of a player, he'd be dominating regardless of who the coach was or what the offensive scheme was.

I'd group him more with a guy like Caron Butler. He'll get an All Star nod or two eventually and he'll hover between 16-20ppg but he'll never be that go to guy at the end of games unless he develops a step back jumper. If he develops that then he has a chance but at this point he's easy to defend if he has the ball at the end of the game.

People are entitled to their own opinions. Just because you happen to disagree, doesn't make it right or wrong. ;)
 
People are entitled to their own opinions. Just because you happen to disagree, doesn't make it right or wrong. ;)

I never said it was wrong, I just said I couldn't believe it.

Although fans tend to overvalue their own players. Tyreke is good but he has as many negatives as he has positives. Those guys in the top tiers have very few negatives.
 
Back
Top