Circa_1985_Fan
All-Star
Good post. I agree totally.I think the current roster wins 33-37, hopefully we go young, make trades, get cap room, and end up with 23-25 wins.
Good post. I agree totally.I think the current roster wins 33-37, hopefully we go young, make trades, get cap room, and end up with 23-25 wins.
Trade deadline is Feb 24th. I see alot of posturing moves being made this year. It should be a busy offseason.when is the trade deadline?
Indeed!At this point it doesn't matter -- we're tanking without even trying to tank.
Of course, this team is so bad we could TRY to tank and we'd probably suck at that too and start winning games.
Never EVER lose on purpose.
It's a poison pill that infects the entire team. Any player you have left will never play right for you again. It's dispiriting not only to fans, but to players and it can put you on a spiral that will destroy a franchise for decades.
You play all out until you are numerically eliminated. Then and only then do you play the kids and "rest" the veterans.
I'm shocked people would actually call for any team to ever lose on purpose.
Bricklayer said:This is the common misconception. Players tanking = bad. But what you want to see happen is basically the FRONT OFFICE tanking. Make moves not designed to win over the next 3 months, but designed to win next year, the year after, the year after that. Let whoever is left fight as hard as they can, and come up short because the team isn't designed to win right now. Then get to the summer with a juicy draft pick, hopefully more material, picks, cap space from moves made at the trading deadline, and then let Geoff try his hand at another summer of '98 full scale rebuild. In that scenario, Kevin might be the only guaranteed returnee. Give him a big stud kid as a running mate, maybe a second pick picked up via trade, with some kids, a free agent or two. No title next year, but maybe the corner is turned and there is a future.
Found it:
http://www.kingsfans.com/forums/showpost.php?p=416490&postcount=33
THAT is what I, at least, am talking about...
I suspect that's just what Petrie is doing.
Personally, I don't like it. I think it's risky and has the potential to be extremely destructive in the long term.
Las Vegas Kings anyone?
You don't tank no matter what!!!![]()
You don't tank no matter what!!!![]()
You don't tank no matter what!!!![]()
Of course you do...a tactical retreat is always part of the arseanl if you're smart.
Or to quote the great philosopher: "you gotta know when to hold 'em, know when to fold 'em".![]()
Let me try to clarify my feelings:
Before committing to a youth movement -- whether it involves giving the bulk of playing time to Garcia, Douby, Williams, etc, OR whether it involves trading our "stars" for unproven players and/or draft picks -- I would exhaust all avenues to rebuild on the fly with established players.
Many teams that have made the commitment to do a total rebuild -- or have been forced to do so because of unforseen circumstances -- have found that that it's very challenging to climb back to the top. Look 80 miles down the road, for starters. There's no guarantee that even a series of lottery picks will solve a team's problems. There's no guarantee that free agents -- especially in a small market -- will want your cap room if you stink.
For all the talk about the potential of this year's college crop, I'd feel much better about the Kings' short- and long-term prospects if I woke up tomorrow and found out that they'd traded (and I'm just using these names as an example, not trying to make up a rumor) for Jermaine O'Neal and David Lee.