The Tankathon Thread (since that's apparently what this is now)

He's the guy I want us to draft.

So we're either dropping a few spots, or standing pat and seeing him go top 4...
I just don’t see Murray as a good fit next to Sabonis defensively. He’s not a shot blocker and offensively he’s not alpha enough for what this team needs imo. However, if he’s BPA at our pick I’d do it
 
The only concern I have with Murray is fit. Do the Kings have the shots for him in the offense as a PF? If not, then he'll play minutes based on his defense and he's probably going to struggle on switches early due to his lack of foot speed. If he goes to a team needing points he could have a shot at ROY production wise.
I actually think so for sure.

Barnes is fairly passive a lot of the time and is pretty content hanging around 11 shots per game. Weirdly, here's his 4 years with us:

18: 11.1 FGA
19: 11.0 FGA
20: 11.1 FGA
21: 11.1 FGA

I think the big thing with Barnes is just letting him fire more from 3pt land in C&S. I wouldn't call him a ball-dominant player at all. Just crazy effective/efficient. And we only have Barnes for one more season before he heads to UFA. Are we going to want to re-up 31 year old Barnes? Murray could just slide right in as Barnes 2.0. 19% USG this season

-Davion is making a case to be the third banana scorer, but he's also showing to be a willing passer/playmaker too. And his mentality is so good, he's the kind of guy who will make the sacrifices. 20.5% USG and 20.9% AST

-DDV is much better as a support player: secondary ball-handler/passer/defense/energy/transition/C&S spacer guy. Being good at all the little things adding up to a very good player. But certainly not a feature scorer. 18.1% USG and 19.1% AST with the Kings

-Sabonis is an excellent scorer, but I think he'd classify himself as a playmaker first; then a scorer. Almost to a fault does he not look for his offense enough. He's the #2, but a #2 that's more than willing to create for others over himself.

So that just leaves Fox as the only real alpha scorer type among the long-term core. Especially if the plan was to bring Mitchell off the bench and let him control the game there, I think you can pretty easily fit another USG scorer with the starters:

Fox
DDV
Barnes
Murray
Sabonis

All kinds of offensive goodness and complimentary talent there. Probably still couldn't stop a pinecone on D, but that's a top 10 offensive unit. I'm a believer in the Murray defense though, even if it doesn't show right away.
 

Kingster

Hall of Famer
Agbaji is rising up my board a ton. 6'5 with a 6'10 wingspan and NBA body; I think he'll be able to check NBA 3's without much of an issue. Doesn't have much (or any really) on-ball creation, but that's not really a huge issue on a team with Fox/Sabonis/Mitchell/DDV. The elite shooting, great off-ball movement, big time athleticism, projects as a + defender at the next level; and while he's a senior he's a "young senior" being 21 all this season.

He reminds me a lot of what people thought Ben McLemore should have been. Use his athleticism in transition and on defense extremely well and a lights-out elite shooter. Makes his money off-ball and as a C&S guy. Understands he's not an on-ball guy and doesn't try to be.
He reminds me a lot of Jimmy Butler. I would be very fine with him as the pick, especially in a trade down.
 
Last edited:
Debatable whether Hopmgren is a forward or a big.
I think he's a 4 to start off that can run some 5 in certain match-ups. It's also one of those things where it'd be helpful to just see what happens when he's checking NBA centers. We all think he's gonna get pushed into the 6th row, but maybe he just makes it work with his length/intelligence around the rim. It helps he's not a Dragan Bender-esq weenie too, where he's very willing to mix it up and get physical with guys.
 
F/C = forward or center
I think he’s a 5. He has the ability to grab a board and go, but he’s not going to face up and get his shot from the perimeter. Maybe on his second contract, but not now. On the perimeter, I don’t see an elite defender. Better down low. His comp is a more perimeter orientated Pau or Domas.
 
I think he’s a 5. He has the ability to grab a board and go, but he’s not going to face up and get his shot from the perimeter. Maybe on his second contract, but not now. On the perimeter, I don’t see an elite defender. Better down low. His comp is a more perimeter orientated Pau or Domas.
Perhaps not, but I think he'll be in a much better position to succeed as a weak-side shot blocker and just using his length to challenge shots on the perimeter in on-ball defense than have to dive right into the Jokic/Embiid/Nurk/Gobert/Capela grown ass centers on the interior. He's not a stiff athletically where he won't at least be able to contest on the perimeter imo.
 
Perhaps not, but I think he'll be in a much better position to succeed as a weak-side shot blocker and just using his length to challenge shots on the perimeter in on-ball defense than have to dive right into the Jokic/Embiid/Nurk/Gobert/Capela grown ass centers on the interior. He's not a stiff athletically where he won't at least be able to contest on the perimeter imo.
He has the blocks, but he doesn’t look exceptionally long for his height. A lot of his blocks were against shorter opponents, who tried to bully him or to out quick him in the interior. His wingspan will be one of the things to key in on, because I don’t see him as someone who’s going to have the agility to peel off his man on the perimeter and to have the length to be a weak side blocking beast in the NBA on his first contract.
 
He has the blocks, but he doesn’t look exceptionally long for his height. A lot of his blocks were against shorter opponents, who tried to bully him or to out quick him in the interior. His wingspan will be one of the things to key in on, because I don’t see him as someone who’s going to have the agility to peel off his man on the perimeter and to have the length to be a weak side blocking beast in the NBA on his first contract.
Who Holmgren not long? Narrow shoulders but he can practically dunk without jumping. His standing reach is probably insane which is why his shotblocking is what it is. Wingspan is horizontal, standing reach is vertical. Defense aside, this right here is the thing that will set him apart in the NBA.



That's the same type of thing that made Scottie Barnes different than a lot of his peers last year IMO. Long steps mean a lot in the NBA since the paint is so open. A 7 footer taking it coast to coast and 2 stepping from the 3 point line to the rim? You don't pass that up. EVER. If he busts he busts.
 
Who Holmgren not long? Narrow shoulders but he can practically dunk without jumping. His standing reach is probably insane which is why his shotblocking is what it is. Wingspan is horizontal, standing reach is vertical. Defense aside, this right here is the thing that will set him apart in the NBA.



That's the same type of thing that made Scottie Barnes different than a lot of his peers last year IMO. Long steps mean a lot in the NBA since the paint is so open. A 7 footer taking it coast to coast and 2 stepping from the 3 point line to the rim? You don't pass that up. EVER. If he busts he busts.
he’s my pick over Jabari if we can get lucky in the lotto. The guy doesn’t back down to physical play even though he’s a twig. NBA weight training and grown man size later will do him wonders
 
he’s my pick over Jabari if we can get lucky in the lotto. The guy doesn’t back down to physical play even though he’s a twig. NBA weight training and grown man size later will do him wonders
I think the scouts had it right prior to the season, Holmgren/Banchero. Personally I take Chet 1 beyond all, but Banchero and he are still the 1/2 to me. As long as he doesn't have any Bol Bol level red flags if I'm one of the top 2 teams I'm taking the gamble.
 
Last edited:
if you watch AJG’s high school highlights he was more way athletic and explosive. I would say 2 years of injuries made him a little timid to go full throttle and decided to make his year at Duke a rehab season of sorts. Also the kid was on a team full of early 1st round picks and his role at Duke was imo most likely not what he’s full capable of. The guy has an NBA body already, with a nice 3 pt shot, high ball IQ and is still a teenager. Lastly his role in Sac would be the same as Duke. Play off ball c&s 3. Definitely wouldn’t mind taking this kid
That's the thing though, are the Kings a good C&S player away from the playoffs? I think they need someone on the Fox/Sabonis level to add to this roster to be able to get there. Griffin just doesn't seem to have that kind of ceiling to me. Even though we need 3&D players, I've never wanted the Kings to use a lottery pick on that archetype because it just seems like they're further away than simply needing a guy who can shoot and hold his own on defense to turn things around.
 
Who Holmgren not long? Narrow shoulders but he can practically dunk without jumping. His standing reach is probably insane which is why his shotblocking is what it is. Wingspan is horizontal, standing reach is vertical. Defense aside, this right here is the thing that will set him apart in the NBA.



That's the same type of thing that made Scottie Barnes different than a lot of his peers last year IMO. Long steps mean a lot in the NBA since the paint is so open. A 7 footer taking it coast to coast and 2 stepping from the 3 point line to the rim? You don't pass that up. EVER. If he busts he busts.
As I said, I don’t think he’s exceptionally long for his height. The question pertains to whether he can play the 4 and be a consistent weak side defender. I don’t know about that. Majority of his blocks were due to dudes trying to bully him and finding out that he’s tough enough to defend them. Look at the Memphis film. I think he’s going to be a 5 long term. He can grab a board and go, but he can’t face up and drive/create in the half court like Banchero. Maybe in his second contract, but not the first,
 
That's the thing though, are the Kings a good C&S player away from the playoffs? I think they need someone on the Fox/Sabonis level to add to this roster to be able to get there. Griffin just doesn't seem to have that kind of ceiling to me. Even though we need 3&D players, I've never wanted the Kings to use a lottery pick on that archetype because it just seems like they're further away than simply needing a guy who can shoot and hold his own on defense to turn things around.
You gotta go BPA. Fit drags the average down. The Kings have had and still do have a talent deficit. There is only one all star level player on the Kings. Need to find another.
 
That's the thing though, are the Kings a good C&S player away from the playoffs? I think they need someone on the Fox/Sabonis level to add to this roster to be able to get there. Griffin just doesn't seem to have that kind of ceiling to me. Even though we need 3&D players, I've never wanted the Kings to use a lottery pick on that archetype because it just seems like they're further away than simply needing a guy who can shoot and hold his own on defense to turn things around.

Yeah, I think so actually. Like, if you hire Kenny Atkinson, and sign Caleb Martin and Chris Boucher to the current core? I'd bet on that team getting to an 8 seed with some chance of getting to a 6. Now, in terms of ceiling and being a top 4 conference? eh, probably not unless things just ran as close to perfect as it could go. We'd need someone else to pop and become a 3rd star.

I'm team BPA though and always have been. You don't use a lotto pick on fit, you always swing for the best possible player and figure it out later. Just like we did with Hali.
 
So the Lakers getting waxed and basically eliminated, but thankfully have a game against OKC left who might legitimately throw out the towel boy for 25 minutes to get a loss. So we have to win out and the Lakers have to lose out for us to tie and go to a coin-flip. Some bad luck the Warriors are fighting to hold the 3 seed and the Nuggets are trying to get the 5 seed from the Jazz so they're going to try.

Gentry predictably didn't follow us word with Davion getting 39 minutes (although 17 assists is really fun) and actually extended the rotation outside of him.

At this point, let's get the G-League guys up. Make sure you secure the 7th odds.