Dime Dropper
All-Star
Tavares is gone. Micic is the only one I'm really interested in and I doubt the Kings FO even know who he is, so at this point, I'm going to sleep. Disappointing night. Good night all.
Lets cut to the chase. Bill is downright horrible. How on earth he has a commentating job is,...well it's a sign of the times I guess![]()
That's no way to run a team, though. If there's a guy you love, you take him. If there's a guy you like, but wouldn't mind another guy, you trade back and hope the guy you like drops. If not, no big deal. But it seems like the Kings loved Nik Stauskas, so they took him. You can debate the choice all you want, but you can't draft the way you are suggesting.
Only problem with him is consistency. Some games he looked like a top 5 pick. Then, for seemingly no reason at all, he'd have 5 or 6 games where he looked like he could go undrafted. He'd disappear in some big games and inflate his stats against weaker teams. But, then he'd go off on a good team and look like a solid lottery pick again. IMO, he made a mistake leaving school early.
Haha! OMG they're the same player!Nik's GF has the same hair color as Jimmer's wife! JIMMER 2.0!
Huh? That is exactly how smart teams draft. If Stauskas could have been had at say 12-16 (which i believe it many felt he would)why not trade back to that slot, accrue some more pieces while still getting your man?
I'm on record as saying I like Stauskas. He's a very good fit with Gay & Cousins as a guy that spreads the floor.
But that was almost the same rationale for McLemore last year. 3&D wing with the athleticism/potential to be more.
So now the Kings have a high ceiling/low floor SG who may not develop and a high floor/low ceiling (presumably) SG and even if they both pan out the Kings still haven't addressed their defensive woes, still haven't found the pass first PG to either replace IT or push h to the bench and they still haven't found the PF or C to start next to DMC and anchor the D & block shots.
I like Stauskas but he's at best a really nice role player and when the rumors have the Kings in the mix for Love, Rondo, Josh Smith etc and reports are that there are 3 deals "on the table" for draft day, not to mention all the "draft 3.0" business, crowd sourcing draft help and PDA talking about being aggressive and swinging for the fences, staying out and drafting a nice role player is a bug disappointment. Especially when he plays the same position as last year's lottery pick.
D'Alessandro chose not to tear the roster apart & rebuild in favor of trying to retool and win now. The 8th pick was the team's biggest trade asset. So where does the improvement come from now?
IT will either be resigned, signed-and-traded or let go without compensation so unless PDA has tricks up his sleeve the best case scenario has the Kings returning the same roster that won 28 games plus Stauskas. No cap room, no draft picks and no young players that could possibly become stars.
It's frustrating. And PDA may want to heed Wooden's words:
"Never mistake activity for achievement."
Anyone that can make 70 out of 76 3pt shots in the rain is fine by me. I think Stauskus will be fine
Combine that with the fact that PDA can't close a trade when it counts and we could be in trouble.
What's the war room look like?
Huh? That is exactly how smart teams draft. If Stauskas could have been had at say 12-16 (which i believe it many felt he would)why not trade back to that slot, accrue some more pieces while still getting your man?
That's not how smart NBA teams draft. That's how smart NFL teams draft. Stauskas was going to be gone in the next couple picks. No way he'd slide anywhere from 12-16. McDermott went #11 and I think that pick would have been Stauskas if he hadn't been there.
As I said, If you LOVE a player like the Kings seemed to love Nik, you take him. Don't mess around. Don't chance it. Take your guy. If there's a player that you like but there's also some others that you like, sure...go for it. drop down. Get your 2nd round pick.
But since you know more than I do, what do you think the Kings would have gotten for moving down to the 12th pick? I say it'd be likely a no-upside veteran bench player and a mid-late 2nd round pick that won't make the team. That'd be complete idiocy. As I said, debate the player they took, but you can not run a draft like that and expect to succeed.
Now, if the Kings had went hard after the Bulls' two picks, maybe I wouldn't argue with you on this. It'd be a much bigger reward.
I'm on record as saying I like Stauskas. He's a very good fit with Gay & Cousins as a guy that spreads the floor.
But that was almost the same rationale for McLemore last year. 3&D wing with the athleticism/potential to be more.
So now the Kings have a high ceiling/low floor SG who may not develop and a high floor/low ceiling (presumably) SG and even if they both pan out the Kings still haven't addressed their defensive woes, still haven't found the pass first PG to either replace IT or push h to the bench and they still haven't found the PF or C to start next to DMC and anchor the D & block shots.
I like Stauskas but he's at best a really nice role player and when the rumors have the Kings in the mix for Love, Rondo, Josh Smith etc and reports are that there are 3 deals "on the table" for draft day, not to mention all the "draft 3.0" business, crowd sourcing draft help and PDA talking about being aggressive and swinging for the fences, staying out and drafting a nice role player is a bug disappointment. Especially when he plays the same position as last year's lottery pick.
D'Alessandro chose not to tear the roster apart & rebuild in favor of trying to retool and win now. The 8th pick was the team's biggest trade asset. So where does the improvement come from now?
IT will either be resigned, signed-and-traded or let go without compensation so unless PDA has tricks up his sleeve the best case scenario has the Kings returning the same roster that won 28 games plus Stauskas. No cap room, no draft picks and no young players that could possibly become stars.
It's frustrating. And PDA may want to heed Wooden's words:
"Never mistake activity for achievement."
I believe that's much of the problem with stauskas. Nothing against the kid he may be the next klay Thompson. Just so many rumors and expectations of big deals and changes. It's a let down for sure. Then they hype up Payton so much and he is there for the taking and bam. I'm underwhelmed for sure. I'm not like some hoping we get some worthless late 2nd rounder here. I will hold out until Tuesday see what we do early in FA. If things are the same after the 4th I'm gonna wonder what they promised Rudy to make him staykings fans watching Gerbil work his rodenty magic:
![]()
Probably been said before. I kinda browsed through the comments, but I don't think PDA intends to move Ben. Reading between the lines, he's trying to build a Warriors type back court. You hear it coming out of Nik's mouth and coach Malone when they talk about Klay Thompson. Obviously this is what they've been discussing behind closed doors.
When you hear Vivek talk, he says he wants to be the Spurs. When PDA talks, he says we need scoring. When Malone is not covering for a poor draft pick, he talks about defense. They are not on the same page and it's all bad.
Combine that with the fact that PDA can't close a trade when it counts and we could be in trouble.
People throw this out all the time but at one point Ben was being talked about as a potential number 1. He showed some serious potential in college, shot the ball just as well as Nik and put up arguably better numers whilst being an elite athlete. Nik is more confident and skilled but there are no sure things. People have very short memories and there's some extreme revisionism about what Ben was in college.
I'm on record as saying I like Stauskas. He's a very good fit with Gay & Cousins as a guy that spreads the floor.
But that was almost the same rationale for McLemore last year. 3&D wing with the athleticism/potential to be more.
So now the Kings have a high ceiling/low floor SG who may not develop and a high floor/low ceiling (presumably) SG and even if they both pan out the Kings still haven't addressed their defensive woes, still haven't found the pass first PG to either replace IT or push h to the bench and they still haven't found the PF or C to start next to DMC and anchor the D & block shots.
I like Stauskas but he's at best a really nice role player and when the rumors have the Kings in the mix for Love, Rondo, Josh Smith etc and reports are that there are 3 deals "on the table" for draft day, not to mention all the "draft 3.0" business, crowd sourcing draft help and PDA talking about being aggressive and swinging for the fences, staying out and drafting a nice role player is a bug disappointment. Especially when he plays the same position as last year's lottery pick.
D'Alessandro chose not to tear the roster apart & rebuild in favor of trying to retool and win now. The 8th pick was the team's biggest trade asset. So where does the improvement come from now?
IT will either be resigned, signed-and-traded or let go without compensation so unless PDA has tricks up his sleeve the best case scenario has the Kings returning the same roster that won 28 games plus Stauskas. No cap room, no draft picks and no young players that could possibly become stars.
It's frustrating. And PDA may want to heed Wooden's words:
"Never mistake activity for achievement."
Probably more shooters, better play from the sg position, and a chance to play with the best big in the game as he approaches his prime.If things are the same after the 4th I'm gonna wonder what they promised Rudy to make him stay
Probably more shooters, better play from the sg position, and a chance to play with the best big in the game as he approaches his prime.