I think there is a legitimate question to what extent he has contributed, at the very least in part, to that toxic environment. Hopefully this summer can get everyone on the same page, and things will be onward and upward from there.
cousins' attitude has been problematic since he came into the league, but i don't think this is a "chicken or egg" scenario by any stretch of the imagination. however much weight we want to assign to demarcus' contributions to the dysfunction of the sacramento kings, simply removing him from the equation would have done
absolutely nothing to improve the culture of toxicity that has spanned two separate ownership groups and two separate front offices. attempts to relocate the franchise. cost cutting measures. blatant mismanagement. abject failures in the draft. bad trades. worse planning. lack of long-term vision. perpetually mediocre signings. cynical gimmicks to appease ticket buyers. hell, even the the kings' post-rick adelman coaching carousel was a problem
long before demarcus was drafted. eric musselman. reggie theus. kenny natt. paul westphal. the first three were hired and fired between 2006 and 2009, and westphal was famously canned after throwing the kings' prized 2010 draft pick under the bus. and don't get me started on the maloofs proclaiming to the heavens that keith smart was "their guy," just as vivek proclaimed to the heavens that michael malone was his guy... well, until he wasn't...
demarcus certainly hasn't been an angel of any kind since arriving in sacramento, but his attitude is hardly the Soul-Sucking Vortex of Doom that grant napear and so many kings fans make it out to be. it's a problem, yes, but when people take such seething umbrage at this particular problem, it's like screaming, "goddammit all, i stubbed my toe!!" right after being punched repeatedly in the face has blurred your vision so you can't see where you're walking. sure, your toe hurts something fierce, but don't you want someone to do something about the person who assaulted you in the first place?! the fact of the matter is this: you can't fire the owner. kings fans were desperate to cast vivek ranadive in the role of a savior, and it's been hard on all of us to realize that, as happy as we may be that vivek purchased the team and kept it here, he's done a p*ss poor job of shepherding this franchise forward into its next era. but kings fans can't do anything about that. kings fans can't do anything about vivek hiring a head coach before properly organizing his front office not once but
twice. kings fans can't do anything about vivek hiring pete d'alessandro and his weaseling ways. kings fans can't do anything about the last two utterly wasted seasons as vivek sorts through his rookie mistakes. and kings fans can't do anything about vlade divac's on-the-job growing pains as he tries to right this practically capsized ship...
but if grant napear gets enough kings fans lathered up about mean ole demarcus cousins and his mean ole bitter beer face, then maybe, just
maybe, kings fans can do something about it. maybe we'll be able to raise enough hell to run him out of town! on a rail, no less!! because he's got to go!! HE'S GOT TO GO!!!! etc.
