Team Rankings
- Thread starter Sum182
- Start date
captain bill
All-Star
is this just your personal rankings or did you get them somewhere?
by the way, nene is out for the year. he'll only be in good condition next year, so things will be a lot different. and saying sac is that good if the play good ball seems strange- if any of the teams 6-10, except maybe dallas, play to their full potential with all their players healthy, they would probably dominate a kings team playing all out, or at least beat them when it comes down to it.
by the way, nene is out for the year. he'll only be in good condition next year, so things will be a lot different. and saying sac is that good if the play good ball seems strange- if any of the teams 6-10, except maybe dallas, play to their full potential with all their players healthy, they would probably dominate a kings team playing all out, or at least beat them when it comes down to it.
T
thesanityannex
Guest
Ummm................last I checked, Amare and Nene were out. Does their presence on the bench provide something to help their team's ratings?Sum182 said:8- Phoenix- with stoudamire g/c
9- Denver- with nene g/c
g/c= good condition
captain bill
All-Star
I assume he means when Amare comes back healthy the Suns will be no 8, and as for the Nene thing, well, I'm assuming it's the same deal. *shrug*
Sum182 said:1- San Antonio
2- Detroit- Arroyo g/c...lol
3- Miami- with shaq g/c
4- Indiana
5- Sacramento- if they play good bball
6- Dallas
7- Houston- with tmac g/c
8- Phoenix- with stoudamire g/c
9- Denver- with nene g/c
10-Cleveland
g/c= good condition
very interesting top 10 considering how the season is going so far.
allrightythen
Starter
So, as I see it Sac is the only team that has to play well to be ranked this high. Does that mean the other teams don't have to play well to maintain thier place in the rankings?
LPKingsFan
All-Star
Well Nene is out all year, so I guess shelve the rankings until next Nov?
Gargamel said:1- San Antonio
2- Detroit- Arroyo g/c...lol
3 - Lakers - if they had Kevin Garnett
4- Miami- with shaq g/c
5- Indiana
6- Sacramento- if they play good bball
7- Dallas
8- Houston- with tmac g/c
9- Phoenix- with stoudamire g/c
10- Denver- with nene g/c
g/c= good condition
uh...IF they play good bball. you could say that for every team. of course teams are higher when they play good bball. strange rankings.
QueensFan
Bench
Hilarious.Gargamel said:1- San Antonio
2- Detroit- Arroyo g/c...lol
3 - Lakers - if they had Kevin Garnett
4- Miami- with shaq g/c
5- Indiana
6- Sacramento- if they play good bball
7- Dallas
8- Houston- with tmac g/c
9- Phoenix- with stoudamire g/c
10- Denver- with nene g/c
g/c= good condition
1- New Orleans/OK City If they trade their team for the spurs team
2- San Antonio if trade of teams with NO/OKC falls through
3- Detroit- Arroyo g/c...lol
4- Miami- with shaq g/c
5- Indiana
6- Dallas
7- Houston- with tmac g/c
8- Phoenix- with stoudamire g/c
9- Denver- with nene g/c
10-Cleveland
g/c= good condition
Gargamel said:
oh geez - where the nuggets are ranked makes absolutely no difference to me. put them 30th...doesnt change my point. your making rankings based on what a team could or should do - not what they have. using the same logic you could put any teams in the top 30. its just a very weak (and perhaps entertaining) way of justifying where you WANT your team to be ranked, and not where they should be. call us overrated. call the kings overrated - not an issue. im sure if i was a spurs, lakers, or suns fan, that team would coincidentally be overrated as well.
i mean, how can you dispute the claim that "if ____ plays better than the kings, they should be higher than the kings" and place any of the 30 teams there, thus placing the kings much lower. basing rankings on conditionals like that is silly.
the logic is horrible. if you want or think the kings should be higher, enjoy. but dont justify it that way. freaking helarious.
Last edited:
Similar threads
- Locked
- Poll
