Section 101
All-Star
Unfortunately pacers have no bad contracts or really any reason. Just my wish
For Adams.
Unfortunately pacers have no bad contracts or really any reason. Just my wish
Are you suggesting a 3 teamer where pacers get Adams and we get turner. Maybe just maybe they want to offload McDermott okFor Adams.
Adams is better than wcs but not by the amount bogie out plays his contract. We are helping them out if the luxury tax, why would we give up something to help them out? I'll take my chances in fa too.I think this is a pretty good/deep C FA class. I would not get give up Bogie to land Adams
Adams is better than wcs but not by the amount bogie out plays his contract. We are helping them out if the luxury tax, why would we give up something to help them out? I'll take my chances in fa too.
No thanks!
I would never give a team that wants to offload contract, an asset.. maybe some deep rotation player or second rounder, but that is it.. its like buying a merchandise from a person that wants to sell it quickly, for a market price..
Kings declined, and now one of two things can happen.. they will find some team that will accept their trade, or they will come back to you at the end..
for Adams there are only couple of teams that can absorb his contract.. and some of those do not need C.. so market for Adams is not huge..
it is better not to make a deal, than to make a bad one..
Dang... I’d do that in a freakin heartbeat.
Why would they? It makes to much sense. Adams has far more value than Bogi. Kings Front office always has to learn the hard way.
Or just change your name from KingsSelecao to KingsHater so no one is surprised with all your negativity about this teamSo is there any chance that some point in the future you might quit trying to be the board curmudgeon?
I'm sure that anyone who has spent more than a few minutes here already see "KingsSelecao" as synonymous with Kings hater.Or just change your name from KingsSelecao to KingsHater so no one is surprised with all your negativity about this team
The thing is though, the Thunder are not in the driver’s seat here. Other teams are. They are in salary cap hell, their best player is getting older and shooting worse with each passing season, and don’t have any young talent really even worth mentioning. Taking Adams from them is a favor as they would save buckets of money. They really aren’t in a position to demand much of anything.I don’t know but you gotta think trading 8 million for 25 million and making a big chunk of the tax penalty disappear is the way to try to go if you’re the thunder.
Now saying that Bogi has been a favorite of mine since he was brought in but to me he is a trade chip that may be the one that may be wise to use. Some folks around here have been questioning his play last year and what he may look like this upcoming season and I for one have been on his side.
Now there has been a lot of talk about having cap space to resign our rookies in a few years but Bogi will be one of those soon also. I think his market value will be in the 15 million range if he gets 15 ppg next season.
A starting lineup of Adams, Bagley, Buddy, Fox and maybe Barnes is pretty strong in my opinion and would really be a better defensive team than last year. We just drafted 3 shooting guards not that I expect them to replace what we lose in that deal but finding a backup sg might not be that hard to find on the cheap. But at what cost would it be?
Well to finish it does sound like vlade is testing the waters and he has a few days more to try swing a deal with someone before he is forced to do those qualifying offers and then the dreaded free agency period of people turning us down starts.
Good luck Vlade as we need something to happen so please don’t disappoint us .
Or just change your name from KingsSelecao to KingsHater so no one is surprised with all your negativity about this team
Its not that straight forward. Their GM has to maximize the talent value. The trade won't be just for the cap space, it will be for pick/s and young players. Its how these things have worked traditionally. Without an adequate talent replacement for Adam, then the Thunder might as well vlow it up and start again which is what they are clearly not going to do given they re-signed PG13 just a year ago.The thing is though, the Thunder are not in the driver’s seat here. Other teams are. They are in salary cap hell, their best player is getting older and shooting worse with each passing season, and don’t have any young talent really even worth mentioning. Taking Adams from them is a favor as they would save buckets of money. They really aren’t in a position to demand much of anything.
Its not that straight forward. Their GM has to maximize the talent value. The trade won't be just for the cap space, it will be for pick/s and young players. Its how these things have worked traditionally. Without an adequate talent replacement for Adam, then the Thunder might as well vlow it up and start again which is what they are clearly not going to do given they re-signed PG13 just a year ago.