chelle said:Many of us have been fans for a long time. Most of will continue to be fans for even longer. No matter how realistic I am in my view of this team and our chances, I always try to have hope, if only a little. To those of you who seem to have more hope that the rest of us, hold on to it. Just try not to be too disappointed if the season does not unfold as you dream! To those of us that are a bit more jaded, I'm going to try to grab on to some of their hope! Who knows . . . miracles can happen and anything is possible.
We were never good enough and so far we aren't now...
You do? I've been here nearly as long as you have, and I don't remember any such thing; what I remember was "Pollyanna" types being browbeat into hiding by a vocal minority... And then they went into hiding themselves... and now the once-positive posters have become negative/realistic... In fact, I'm a little surprised that they haven't returned to admire their handiwork; aside from the fact that we still hate Voisin around here, and many of us would like to see her dragged into the street and shot on the six o'clock news, this board has more or less turned into exactly what they said they wanted it to be.quick dog said:I remember when people around here used to cut the errant Pollyanna some slack now and then.
VF21 said:I didn't say Peja, Mike and Brad aren't talented. What I said was:
I am NOT being pessimistic. I'm being realistic. The season just passed doesn't mean squat. For one thing, we had Webber for more than half of that season and he was a force at the 4 we have no replacement for. In addition, Evans, Mobley, House and Darius are not presently on the team any longer. Trying to predict what will happen next season based on last season is only even partially applicable if you are going to have the same players returning. We have oozing gaping holes in our roster that Petrie is going to have to address.
When I said "this isn't a new argument," I was referring to the discussion of whether or not this team - as presently structured - is capable of being truly competitive in the upcoming season. I wasn't saying it was an argument with you.
VF21 said:I revised my comments, C Diddy.
This isn't a new argument. NOTHING has changed yet. If he's going to put the post out here, then he has to expect people to either agree or disagree.
I'm very sorry if I'm not ready to dance around the maypole and sing joyful songs about the state of the Kings at this point in time. I can be as optimistic as the next person, but come on. Can't we also be realistic?
This version of the Kings is NOTHING like the 2002-2003 version. And I am heartily tired of revisionist history that attempts to put Webber into a minor role. He wasn't minor. He was a very big reason for the success we did have.
Have you forgotten how long it took Petrie to build the team? It didn't happen all at once.
I love this team to the core of my being, but it drives me totally nuts for people to put their heads in the sand and try and pretend everything is hunky-dory. It's not hunky-dory. If everything was that great, we wouldn't have been sitting on the sidelines watching since the first round.
VF21 said:I'm very sorry if I'm not ready to dance around the maypole and sing joyful songs about the state of the Kings at this point in time. .
chelle said:Hope comes in when we decide to trust in something when we have no real proof or evidence on which to base that trust.
VF21 said:Never good enough? That's insulting to the guys who played their hearts out in 2001-2002 and 2002-2003. It's a slap on the face, IMHO. It's saying, "Hey, you guys are losers."
.
Bricklayer said:We don't have three "All-Stars". People keep on saying that in order to pump our guys up, but its not true. We have one no-time All-Star. One All-Star by complete default because there has been nobody clearly better, and one All-Star who's made it once on merit, and twice simply because we had a good record. NONE of them are perennial All-Stars. None of them make the All-Star team if they play for the Clippers. They are very good players, but half the teams in the league have three players at their level. They may not even be the best trio in Northern California anymore.
Good enough to be in the playoff hunt? Sure. Good enough to be a 50 win team? With a little help. Good enough to be a contender? Not even close. NO title team in my memory has ever had a "core" that looked remotely like ours right now. We aren't even close, and completely fail in every way that matters in the playoffs -- rebounding, defense, toughness, post play, testosterone and desire.
.
What he said. No one enjoys being on the decline, getting better is the key if you want to eventually win it all. And a team can stay at the plateau for awhile, as evidenced by repeat championships with little to no change in major personnel. We didn't get there and now it's time to revamp. Maybe it takes a year or two, but most of you have been around long enough to know it will happen again.mr. moustache said:Man. Lotta b*thin going on here. What's wrong with a 50win playoff team. I know the team had a better record with Webber, but given a training camp and some time together I think the team as is(with MO and Darius) is about a 50win team. That's not bad. Maybe things click the right way and we make it to the 2nd round.
The thing that gets me down is injuries, other than that each and every Kings team since 99 has been entertaining. When Skinner was a defensive force the Kings were great to watch. It's not a sustainable thing, so what. They still trounced the Lakers and that always feels good.
I don't expect Petrie to stand pat, but this isn't a championship team. There's really only about 4 teams in the league that have that capacity. We used to be one, we aren't now. Maybe we'll luck into a great draft pick. Ben Wallace, Manu Ginobli, Tony Parker(overrated), Gilbert Arenas, Brad Miller etc. They're all late picks. Maybe we'll luck out. If we don't, I'll be ok. I just want the team to play with some heart. Bring doug back for cap room next year, maybe we can get a 2nd round pick for it.
C Diddy said:I miss the homer VF21, Willing to defend every King until her last breath, admitting realism only when forced, defender of newbies, banner of trolls, etc etc etc.
I'm all for realism and admitting that we are a borderline playoff team with 3 marginal all-stars and a couple oft-injured veterans with some unproven young guys thrown in but my favorite team is still the Sacramento Kings and sometimes its feels good to be a homer.
thesanityannex said:Just trying to look at it realistically as you've advised me too. Realistically, only one team wins, so that makes every other team not good enough at that time. It is not a slap in the face, it is stating the obvious. Should I call them winners for losing....no. Did they play with heart...yes. Can I still HOPE for a better next season...yes. I find these futile attempts to change MY feelings of hope ludicrous.
VF21 said:I owe you an apology for not making my objections clearer. Of course you have the right to have hope...
What I find fault with sometimes is your justifications for some things. Like above, for example.
To you it's just about winning or losing. To me it's also about how you played the game. As an example, if I was a Piston fan right now I would, of course, be very disappointed that my team hadn't won it all for the second time in a row. I would not be calling them losers however. They fought the good fight. At the end, they were simply out-played by a better team. To me, there's no shame in that whatsoever and I would still be very proud of them for what they DID accomplish...
We're both Kings fans... luckily we can disagree about the details while still agreeing with the bottom line.