Bricklayer said:
3) Spurs, despite the defensive and rebounding prowess, have long had a bit of soft lingering about them too. Without Horry, they choke this Finals, which would have been 3 of the last 5 years they choked/collapsed out of the playoffs.
Of course Horry did choke against LA last season (2004). Actually was horrible on both ends and missed open shots, several of them.
Interesting thing about Game 5, is Billups was the only Piston doing well on offense, not like the entire team was kicking their ***. Another funny thing was Horry missed about 4 wide open layups in the first half that could have extended to Spurs lead to about 14-16 of that first half in Game 5.
Why is LA credited for being such a great title team in your eyes Brick, when they needed an Horry miracle to beat the Kings without their 2nd best player? Aren't a lot of titles won on last second shots?
Isn't it a little simplistic to credit Horry for their title? Wasn't Horry the reason the Lakers won in 2002 as well by that logic?
And why not just call Pop and Duncan chokers, they are the only constants in SA over the last decade.