Hamilton/Billups were about 20/18 a couple times and a shade less for a few low-scoring pace teams.
I cannot recall the last instance of 2 true 20+pt scorers in an NBA backcourt, let alone two 23+pt scorers in an NBA backcourt. If there is one its probably a smallball scenario. And its not because nobody has ever tried or its such a unique idea. Its because it doesn't work, and frankly even if you could get the guards to somehow work together, too much of your scoring would be coming from outside. Something will have to give. Reke's Roy campaign may well depend on it being the veteran. On Kevin basically backing all the way off to 18-20ppg spot shooter/fast break scorer.
As an aside, Reke's last 10 games:
23.2pts (.506 .238 .825) 5.5reb 5.8ast
The race for ROY is Quickly turning into the race for runner up ROY.
Remember Blake Griffin? The Clipper curse is in effect. They say he's coming back, but he's never really been here. Start combing the La Brea Tar Pits.![]()
Are you saying that if Griffin comes back let's say mid season, or close to that somehow he will sky rocket to being #1 for ROY almost instantaneously?
Griffin so far is unproven in the NBA, and it will take him some time to fully recover from his knee injury, aka the rest of this season and off season to feel 100% by next season most likely, and if he plays this year he won't be 100% most likley.
Even if he was who has more affect on an entire team, a PG, or a PF? Both can have an affect on a team, but if all the other pieces won't be as good unless you have a good PG orchestrating it. Even if Blake had been playing this entire season so far, I think we'd still be talking about Reke at #1 and Blake and Jennings flip flopping between 2 and 3.
And yet they weren't even close to what we are proposing really. Two 18ppg scorers and Dantley was a SF. Pretty similar to the modern Detroit incarnation really.
My own candidates were KJ/Hornacek, but the only year Hornacek barely snuck over 20 (20.1) KJ ended at 19.7 (and Hornacek was traded durng the offseason for Barkely). The Monroe/Frazier duo, whihc as mentioend did it all of once in 74/75. Run TMC, which also did it once, the year before Mitch was traded to us. And then having to go all the way back to the early 70s Lakers with West/Goodrich, who did it three times, asuming you did not call West a SF. And frankly those early examples come from different eras in basketball when scoring was considerably higher than it is today. The other thing is you look at those pairings, and Mitch, who was a good passer, was the worst passer of any of the SGs involved. They were all combo guards. All guys who ran point from time to time and so could keep the rest of the team at least somewhat involved. Trying to have such a duo centered around just scoring would kill your ball movement and trash the rest of your team. Right now when Reke doesn't have the ball Beno or Sergio often do, off on the other side of the court running a play with their teammates. Everybody stays involved.
No. I'm saying that if Tyreke keeps going the way he has been it will be hard for anybody to keep up with him for ROY.Are you saying that if Griffin comes back let's say mid season, or close to that somehow he will sky rocket to being #1 for ROY almost instantaneously?
Griffin so far is unproven in the NBA, and it will take him some time to fully recover from his knee injury, aka the rest of this season and off season to feel 100% by next season most likely, and if he plays this year he won't be 100% most likley.
Even if he was who has more affect on an entire team, a PG, or a PF? Both can have an affect on a team, but if all the other pieces won't be as good unless you have a good PG orchestrating it. Even if Blake had been playing this entire season so far, I think we'd still be talking about Reke at #1 and Blake and Jennings flip flopping between 2 and 3.
I did a little searching based somewhat on my memory, and came up with the following. I also listed some SFs as well to help with the discussion.
88-89 Denver Nuggets
Michael Adams - 18.5 pts
Fat Lever - 19.8 pts
Alex English - 26.5 pts
88-89 LA Lakers
Magic Johnson - 22.5 pts
Byron Scott - 19.6 pts
James Worthy - 20.5 pts
90-91 GS Warriors
Tim Hardaway - 22.9 pts
Mitch Richmond - 23.9 pts
Chris Mullin - 25.7 pts
90-91 Portland Trailblazers
Terry Porter - 17.0 pts
Clyde Drexler - 21.5 pts
91-92 Portland Trailblazers
Terry Porter - 18.1 pts
Clyde Drexler - 25.0 pts
91-92 GS Warriors
Tim Hardaway - 23.4 pts
Marciulonis - 18.9 pts
Chris Mullin - 25.6 pts
I stopped looking after that, and didn't go back further than 88-89. I know that the combination of Fat Lever, Michael Adams and Alex Enlish put up a lot of points in the 80s. Denver always seemed to average around 115-120 pts a game back then to lead the league.