Good questions everyone. Something which hasn't been touched on which I really, really want an answer to, and actually believe we need an answer to is why PDA feels he speaks for the Sac fanbase when he says we want up and down, up tempo basketball over winning basketball. He's actually said an up and down style represents this city, giving the implication the reason he's pushing for that style is because we're the ones who want it. And I think this question needs just a little background. So my question would be:
Pete, you have taken the liberty on multiple occasions to tell us, the fans, what style of basketball most suits us as a city and fan base and what style of basketball we want to watch, that style being a more up-tempo, up and down brand of basketball, to the point we'd support firing our most successful coach since Rick Adelman, whom the players had completely bought into and a number of which were not only playing the best basketball of their careers but were getting their first taste of winning in this league, and throwing away this season, all in the hopes of chasing that style despite Ty Corbin not being a coach who represents the style you want, nor having the roster to pursue the style you want. So my question, Pete, is two fold. One, if you're implementing a style which you claim the city and fan base wants, why have you chosen to pursue a style which negates our chances of winning by going away from the strengths of our franchise player in DeMarcus and is not a style which has won in this league when it matters most, unless you have Lebron, and two, what is your reaction to the fan reaction which unanimously opposes chasing that style, and instead wants a defensive oriented team based around DeMarcus' skillset in a slower, half court based system much like Marc Gasol and Memphis? Are you willing to change your blueprint to fit to the true feelings of the fan base which is in apparent opposition to your own? Thank you for your time.