SIR HENRY 8
Bench
after some thinking ,I'd have to say Bibby ...It would ideal situation for him to be in, he is not afraid to take the shot,he WANTS to take that shot,Bibby is Clutch
Finally!SIR HENRY 8 said:after some thinking ,I'd have to say Bibby ...It would ideal situation for him to be in, he is not afraid to take the shot,he WANTS to take that shot,Bibby is Clutch
KP said:At least you answered!So you say Nash?![]()
...wait what about Marion or Amare or Richardson they don't draw any attention? As far as letting Webber take the shot, that worked out real good for the Bucks and Houston huh??![]()
Peja?? 2 years ago before the injury Webb hit about 4 of those shots, looks like he's on about the same pace this year. Nash has hit some big shots, but sorry, Mike is just more clutch.4cwebb said:I'd rather have Nash taking a last second shot consistently from that Suns' roster as the rest of the guys around him are relatively streaky. Sure, they draw attention, but I guess I'm envisioning a scenario with very little time left on the clock where the defense only has to worry about a short pass or the guy with the ball taking the shot.
And, I enjoyed the Milwaukee and Houston outcomes, but I think that's just a shot that if you are the other team you have to live with instead of letting Bibby or Peja have an open look from that same distance.
KP said:Peja?? 2 years ago before the injury Webb hit about 4 of those shots, looks like he's on about the same pace this year. Nash has hit some big shots, but sorry, Mike is just more clutch.
Parni Valjak said:Its called a joke .. ?![]()
Just out of curiosity how'd you pick your name?? Mike has hit a lot of shots in a lot of big games against a lot of good teams. And If you gotta pick one guy (I hate the whole Peja vs. Webb thing) I think I'll go with the guy whose made about 8 in the last few years, even though "regular season games" don't count... I think I'm 4cwebb on this one.4cwebb said:Alright, I'll grant you that CWebb has in actuality made more game-winning (or game-tying), last-second shots than Peja, but if you had to pick one player to take a three with less than 3 seconds left, and you knew that player was going to be relatively open when taking that shot, who are you picking?
As for Nash and Bibby, I think Mike has that shot against the Lakers in the playoffs in 2002, but other than that, much like CWebb, his game winning shots are for games which in the end only count as a W or a L in the standings. Not that those aren't important, but it's not as if any of the players we are discussing here are taking (and making) the shots that they great clutch shooters seem to consistently make.
bibbyweb said:(Smiley since that seems to justify anything u say)
GoGoGadget said:Really?
They justify anything you say??
Well, then, I gotta start using those puppies more often.
You stupid son of a...![]()
![]()
![]()
bibbyweb said:My last comment here.
Seem that we have some really decent people here.
KP said:Just out of curiosity how'd you pick your name?? Mike has hit a lot of shots in a lot of big games against a lot of good teams. And If you gotta pick one guy (I hate the whole Peja vs. Webb thing) I think I'll go with the guy whose made about 8 in the last few years, even though "regular season games" don't count... I think I'm 4cwebb on this one.![]()
Heuge said:I hope no Kings make the allstars.
Geoff said:No matter how big a homer you are, you can't honestly say that Bibby is better than Nash.
4cwebb is right, in my opinion. Webber is now very capable of coming through in the clutch. But that doesn't mean he has a better chance than the best shooter in the league at hitting the open three. Webber has missed some clutch shots also.4cwebb said:Alright, I'll grant you that CWebb has in actuality made more game-winning (or game-tying), last-second shots than Peja, but if you had to pick one player to take a three with less than 3 seconds left, and you knew that player was going to be relatively open when taking that shot, who are you picking?
quick dog said:I think Brad is better than Yao Ming, and Bibby is better than Nash. However, I hope none of our players go to the Allstar Game.
I am sorry, but I hope some of these Allstar, media hype, heros pull some injuries. Our best guys have had to suffer through serious injuries for too many years. These injuries really bug me. I just want the Kings to beat San Antonio, and it won't happen unless we get our WHOLE team back. Adelman seldom gets much credit for guiding the U.C. Davis Hospital pick-up squad into the playoffs every year. The Kings get no respect. It's all related to injuries.
Yeah when we finally have all our starters back, any one of them is capable of hitting a shot with time running down... good problem to have.allrightythen said:I know this isn't this topic of the thread, but I think its nice to be able to argue about who you would want to take the last second shot and the team and your choices are Webb, Bibby, and Peja. Thats just scratching the surface. The other two guys that would most likely be out there are Miller and Mobely and they are terrible shooters either. I like our chances in any close game. To follow the topic though, I think would be satisfied with any of the five getting a good shot, after all thats the reason we have all those shooters, so it doesn't matter all that much who shoots, as long as they are open. For some reason my gut points to Bibby though, if I had to run a play for one guy, it would be him.
Its fun being a Kings fan right now!
Heuge said:I hope no Kings make the allstars.
gangdogu said:So do I. ASB is such a good time to rest. I remember last year when Brad got injured on that silly action...
nAj jAn™ said:This post is gotta be a joke right?
goggles99 said:Outside of the USA Homeland people always vote for their own citizens, even if they stink. I'm not saying this is unfair. I would do the same thing, it is just something to keep in mind if you are using this vote-count to judge who is better or more deserving.
piksi said:Americans of course vote fair and impartial
![]()
6th said:Well, you must admit that we have many many more players to choose from. That makes it pretty darn impartial by comparison, now doesn't it?![]()
piksi said:impartial by comparison would work if the people who vote would not have a favorite team or player. But in that case Phoenix would have at least one starter and so would the Kings.