Old Trade Thread (no longer need to post all trades here)
- Thread starter CaminoChaos
- Start date
Bricklayer said:
tell that to Charlie. 
Last edited:
S
Sprewell? no way the Kings already said they don't want him we don't need any cancer players on this team.
The only team I see Sprewell going to is the Bobcats and Houston but I'm not sure if they would want him maybe Houston since they wanted him before Derek Anderson didn't sign with the Rockets.
But please keep Sprewell away from this team.
The only team I see Sprewell going to is the Bobcats and Houston but I'm not sure if they would want him maybe Houston since they wanted him before Derek Anderson didn't sign with the Rockets.
But please keep Sprewell away from this team.
Peja - Bibby - KT, or Corliss to Indiana for Jermaine O'Neal - Anthony Johnson or J. Tinsley..
Would be
c-Miller
pf-O'Neal
sf-SAR
sg-Wells
pg-Tinsley or Johnson or Hart
The problem with this lineup is we have no outside threat, so maybe we could do a 3 team thing with Cleveland or something, and try to get Damon Jones. Maybe send Wells or something. Geez, I wish we never let Hedo go.
Would be
c-Miller
pf-O'Neal
sf-SAR
sg-Wells
pg-Tinsley or Johnson or Hart
The problem with this lineup is we have no outside threat, so maybe we could do a 3 team thing with Cleveland or something, and try to get Damon Jones. Maybe send Wells or something. Geez, I wish we never let Hedo go.
Last edited:
Bibby, Peja, and skinner/kt, or corliss would benefit both sides I believe. Artest could slide to SG, play Peja at SF, and either Start Pollard at C, or Croshere at PF. Bibby would be their PG (who is better than tinsley, and johnson). They can trade Jackson and Tinsley for a C or PF type player.
But yah it is far fetched. I can see Indiana shaking things up though if they don't win it all w/in the next few years.
But yah it is far fetched. I can see Indiana shaking things up though if they don't win it all w/in the next few years.
Shaking up is one thing -- but trading their franchise player? VERY difficult to imagine. Long long season. Unless it looks they are going to actually miss the playoffs and the wheels are falling off, its hard to see Jermaine going anywhere unless it be for KG (and I only say the latter just because one of resident Indiana fans suggested it).
Ruben Patterson couldn't believe what he was hearing Wednesday: After being told Monday to leave the Trail Blazers, the team now said it was going to suspend him for two games.
"For what?" an incredulous Patterson said Wednesday from his home in Columbus, Ohio. "They are the ones who told me to go home, so I went home. They are the ones who put me on the inactive list. I don't know what else to do. I mean, since they ain't going to play me, why don't they just trade me?"
Patterson could be traded today, his agent says, if Trail Blazers general manager John Nash was willing.
"There is not only interest in Ruben, there are trades out there," agent Dan Fegan said. "Two weeks ago New York offered Malik Rose; yeah, that's right, they offered a trade, but John Nash only wants short-term contracts. He could trade Ruben tomorrow."
Nash, however, is sticking to his game plan of making trades that are responsible, both from a fiscal and competitive standpoint. He said he is hopeful but skeptical a trade can be found that meets his parameters.
"We are hoping his agent can come up with something," Nash said.
The suspension was retroactive to Tuesday's game at Memphis, and coupled with Wednesday's game at Miami, Patterson no longer is suspended, only inactive. Nash said the Blazers came to the decision to suspend Patterson on Tuesday, taking an extra day after sending him home to review the facts.
The NBA played a part in the decision, voicing concern Monday that the Blazers were using the inactive list as a way to punish a player, which was against the spirit of the guidelines outlined in the new collective-bargaining agreement. However, Nash said the team was leaning toward suspending Patterson after Sunday's incident.
Patterson, who stands to lose $115,512 in salary, said he will file an appeal with the players association. He said Sunday's incident is being blown out of proportion.
"I didn't cuss Nate out like everybody thinks," Patterson said. "I did go at it with Nate, and I used some swear words, but I didn't cuss him out."
"For what?" an incredulous Patterson said Wednesday from his home in Columbus, Ohio. "They are the ones who told me to go home, so I went home. They are the ones who put me on the inactive list. I don't know what else to do. I mean, since they ain't going to play me, why don't they just trade me?"
Patterson could be traded today, his agent says, if Trail Blazers general manager John Nash was willing.
Nash, however, is sticking to his game plan of making trades that are responsible, both from a fiscal and competitive standpoint. He said he is hopeful but skeptical a trade can be found that meets his parameters.
"We are hoping his agent can come up with something," Nash said.
The suspension was retroactive to Tuesday's game at Memphis, and coupled with Wednesday's game at Miami, Patterson no longer is suspended, only inactive. Nash said the Blazers came to the decision to suspend Patterson on Tuesday, taking an extra day after sending him home to review the facts.
The NBA played a part in the decision, voicing concern Monday that the Blazers were using the inactive list as a way to punish a player, which was against the spirit of the guidelines outlined in the new collective-bargaining agreement. However, Nash said the team was leaning toward suspending Patterson after Sunday's incident.
Patterson, who stands to lose $115,512 in salary, said he will file an appeal with the players association. He said Sunday's incident is being blown out of proportion.
"I didn't cuss Nate out like everybody thinks," Patterson said. "I did go at it with Nate, and I used some swear words, but I didn't cuss him out."
Interesting, iffy stuff there in Portland.
I'd like to see Patterson in Sac
.
Kings113 said:
http://www.oregonlive.com/blazers/oregonian/index.ssf?/base/sports/113280451175190.xml&coll=7&thispage=1
Interesting, iffy stuff there in Portland.
I'd like to see Patterson in Sac.
Interesting, iffy stuff there in Portland.
I'd like to see Patterson in Sac
.
The Kings will NOT bring Patterson to Sacramento. It will not happen. The mere idea that some Kings fans would actually want him here, considering everything that has gone on with him, makes me a little sick to my stomach.
The Kings are a sports team. You have to draw the line somewhere on just how much you'll forgive to see someone on that team, regardless of how "good" they might be.
1. Patterson isn't THAT good.
2. Sorry, but the line I draw is way ABOVE the R. Pattersons of the world.
The Kings are a sports team. You have to draw the line somewhere on just how much you'll forgive to see someone on that team, regardless of how "good" they might be.
1. Patterson isn't THAT good.
2. Sorry, but the line I draw is way ABOVE the R. Pattersons of the world.
How about we S&T Peja to orlando for grant hill? Hill will have a huge expiring contract that year to go with our other players, maybe we can dump tough luck kenny thomas on them too and get like jameer nelson or something? We're lined up for huge capspace in 07, hill, although injury prone, is still awesome. Bosh, DWade, Melo, LeBron, some other good players like nowitzki are good FA's. If we can keep adelman and one of those players are on losing teams(expect most to get locked up, but dirk will opt out of his contract) so they won't want to sign an extension-we can tempt them with a playoff ready roster and a good coach with some promising young players who are good teammates(KMart+Cisco). Say if we got Bosh, we can move Shareef for someone else thats a real good player. If the nuggets are still playing like they are now, expect Melo to bolt-same with LeBron. Also, California IMO has pretty good weather and isn't too far from the beach. We also have good resturaunts, I just saw 2 of the kings players(reef+jason hart) at the same resturaunt I went to w/ the rest of my family for lunch. Dirk gets more money by using the option to opt out of his contract in 2007. Dwyane Wade might want to leave if the heat still haven't won anything-doubtful he'll leave but probable they won't win a chip IMO, Detroit and SA are clearly better.
This isn't a trade, but more of a suggestion...
I think the Kings need a new back-up point...Jason Hart has been terrible, and unfortunatly I don't see much improvment.
MY patience is wearing thin, so I have a few suggestions.
1: Omar Cook
http://hoopshype.com/players/omar_cook.htm
http://www.nba.com/playerfile/omar_cook/
2: Jamison Brewer
http://hoopshype.com/players/jamison_brewer.htm
http://www.nba.com/playerfile/jamison_brewer/index.html
3: Tito Maddox
http://hoopshype.com/players/tito_maddox.htm
http://www.nba.com/playerfile/tito_maddox/
4: Vonteego Cummings
http://hoopshype.com/players/vonteego_cummings.htm
http://www.nba.com/playerfile/vonteego_cummings/index.html
http://www.nba.com/dleague/playerfile/vonteego_cummings/index.html
Compare that too...
Jason Hart
http://hoopshype.com/players/jason_hart.htm
http://www.nba.com/playerfile/jason_hart/index.html
Well...Really only Cook (who I really like) and Cummings have had some success in the league...But all the aforementioned players are good defensive players. Also, all (minus the long-shot Cummings) are younger than Hart, and potentially could develop an offensive game.
I think if given the opportunity, Cook could be a good bench player. Same could be said for Brewer, if he stays away from shooting the ball to much, and plays within himself.
Maddox would be a complete experiment.
And Vonteego would give Cisco/Martin a vetran to lead them into battle. HE knows about the league, and could provide some guidance possibly.
Hmm...Just something to ponder upon.
I think the Kings need a new back-up point...Jason Hart has been terrible, and unfortunatly I don't see much improvment.
MY patience is wearing thin, so I have a few suggestions.
http://hoopshype.com/players/omar_cook.htm
http://www.nba.com/playerfile/omar_cook/
http://hoopshype.com/players/jamison_brewer.htm
http://www.nba.com/playerfile/jamison_brewer/index.html
http://hoopshype.com/players/tito_maddox.htm
http://www.nba.com/playerfile/tito_maddox/
http://hoopshype.com/players/vonteego_cummings.htm
http://www.nba.com/playerfile/vonteego_cummings/index.html
http://www.nba.com/dleague/playerfile/vonteego_cummings/index.html
Compare that too...
Jason Hart
http://hoopshype.com/players/jason_hart.htm
http://www.nba.com/playerfile/jason_hart/index.html
Well...Really only Cook (who I really like) and Cummings have had some success in the league...But all the aforementioned players are good defensive players. Also, all (minus the long-shot Cummings) are younger than Hart, and potentially could develop an offensive game.
I think if given the opportunity, Cook could be a good bench player. Same could be said for Brewer, if he stays away from shooting the ball to much, and plays within himself.
Maddox would be a complete experiment.
And Vonteego would give Cisco/Martin a vetran to lead them into battle. HE knows about the league, and could provide some guidance possibly.
Hmm...Just something to ponder upon.
Last edited: