Rockmeister
All-Star
You took the words right out of my mouth.C Diddy said:At this point, I dont care how many teams we have, as long as MVP16 isnt one of them. I think he should be disincluded strictly out of spite.
You took the words right out of my mouth.C Diddy said:At this point, I dont care how many teams we have, as long as MVP16 isnt one of them. I think he should be disincluded strictly out of spite.
I agree on that aswell.C Diddy said:At this point, I dont care how many teams we have, as long as MVP16 isnt one of them. I think he should be disincluded strictly out of spite.
well you were Moonsaber a long time member, you should get higher priority.Insomniacal Fan said:Please put me down on the waiting list for if you decide to expand.
Long time members don't get priority, only long time players.Mad D said:well you were Moonsaber a long time member, you should get higher priority.
Don't let the voices of a few confuse you into thinking it's the thoughts of the majority. I've yet to see a reason to keep you out of the league, so your still on my waiting list. But I can assume since that is the case, we won't be expanding.MVP16 said:wth, u guys dont want me in the league, FINE!
U guys are bunch of !!!!!s, its just a game, so what if i win?
Actually I don't have to remember, since my memory is horrible and it's in this thread, downunderking is first, you are second.Bballkingsrock said:Hey Jsin I was the first one the waiting list!!!! Remember?
No, I have a male memory.Bricklayer said:Really? You have a selective memory.![]()
You guys are way too direct.Insomniacal Fan said:Teehee... boobs
Por qua?C Diddy said:130013
That would be slightly more subtle. Anyhow, as far as the fantasy league goes, 14 teams wouldnt be too bad, but extending it farther then that is going to be really tedious. Especially if we only do updates once per week again.
How do the players know you're playing them all the time?Bricklayer said:Actually in deep leagues the weekly format works better because in a daily I-have-no-life league every single player you pick is going to play on a regular basis and it puts a lot of stress on the players at the end of the deep drafts.
I can be subtle. The Male Memory:VF21 said:You guys are way too direct.
At least bdouble013 is subtle...
![]()
I think you're missing the point. Jamal Sampson or Paul Shirley do NOT start even in a 20 team league unless you have 15 starting positions. And in a weekly league, they rarely even play unless something goes amiss. They are gambles to take on your bench.C Diddy said:Brick,
Choosing who to start between Jamal Sampson and Paul Shirley isn't fun. And thats what we are going to be reduced to if we up it to 20 teams, as someone else suggested. When your roster has 7 8-12 guys on it, weekly updates aren't fun. Also, you dont need to be a "I-have-no-life" to be succesful in the daily update setting. You can set each day's lineups once a week and the system will remember who you selected to start or bench that day.
It likely is more competitive. It is also work, rather than play at a certain point. The competition is at least as much about who's got more spare time to waste rather than who's got the acumen. Particularly in deep leagues, keeping track of the health and PT of every player in the NBA all season long on a daily basis is neither practical nor fun.Grobar said:meh i view it as more competitive. its boring if you just set your lineup and then do nothing for a whole damn week, after you tumulously spent time drafting the exact players.
Everything has to do with boobs Brick... you should know better.Bricklayer said:!
This has nothing to do with boobs Jsin.![]()
thats a good point. i've never been in a leauge with more then 10 teams, so i guess i dont have much experience to argue on. i usually just set my lineup for the whole week, then pop in and out to check news, and see if anybody got injured or so... if its set up weekly, it gets boring because you basically just have to set your starters, see the score, and do it all over again.Bricklayer said:It likely is more competitive. It is also work, rather than play at a certain point. The competition is at least as much about who's got more spare time to waste rather than who's got the acumen. Particularly in deep leagues, keeping track of the health and PT of every player in the NBA all season long on a daily basis is neither practical nor fun.
It can work in small/shallow leagues. But then again my mom can draft a decent team if she doesn't have to know anybody but the starters around the league.
Luck is a much more important factor in weekly leagues than your so-called "strategy." The only strategy comes into play when you look to see which players are playing the most games that week, or who's on a hot streak, and plug them in. Once your roster is set for the week, it's all luck: you hope that the player hits for his averages. You hope that the player doesn't get injured, or suspended. If you had Stojakovic, for example, in your lineup last year during X-mas week, and you lost him for a game because of his suspension, and those 25 points and 4 three-pointers ended up costing you the week, that's bad luck; there's no strategy involved. And don't say it never happens... there's no way to anticipate that Stojakovic is going to bump a referee and get himself suspended. It's just not something he usually does.JSin said:And I'm keeping it at weekly, our league's have shown daily leagues seperate into two groups, those who have the time to check every day, and those who don't. Weekly is more stratigic, more knowledge, more lazy.