Official 2009 Free Agent Tracking Thread (merged)

The Orlando Magic's active offseason continued Monday when they closed in on a deal to sign free-agent forward Matt Barnes, according to sources with knowledge of the talks.

One source told ESPN.com that Barnes and the Magic have agreed in principle on a two-year deal for an undisclosed amount that could be announced as early as Tuesday.

Since reaching the NBA Finals for just the second time in franchise history, Orlando has traded for former All-Star swingman Vince Carter, signed free-agent forward Brandon Bass, matched a five-year, $34 million offer sheet to restricted free agent Marcin Gortat and pursued Barnes to join a group of newcomers that also includes Ryan Anderson from the Carter trade.
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?id=4342767
 
The Magic are going to be loaded, and I'm calling it now - Shaq will do to the Cavs, what he did to the Suns... and that's make them worse.

Orlando will only have to worry about Boston next year, IMO.
 
how can shaq make them worse when all he's doing is esentially taking ben wallaces place and thats not mentioning that shaq was in pretty good shape last year. And they still have big Z. I just laugh when people make claims that really don't make any sense at all
 
how can shaq make them worse when all he's doing is esentially taking ben wallaces place and thats not mentioning that shaq was in pretty good shape last year. And they still have big Z.
I have to agree. I don't think Shaq will be detrimental to the Cavs because they aren't a fast break team. Anything that helps space the floor out for LeBron and Mo Williams should be good for the Cavs. And since Shaq can actually score, teams won't roam off of him like they did Ben Wallace. I'm not certain that adding Shaq makes them capable of beating the Celtics or the Magic (assuming all teams are healthy), but I don't think it makes them worse.
 
how can shaq make them worse when all he's doing is esentially taking ben wallaces place and thats not mentioning that shaq was in pretty good shape last year. And they still have big Z. I just laugh when people make claims that really don't make any sense at all

Shaq tears teams up from the inside -- Cleveland's esprit de corps was a major factor for them last year, and they just added the human chemistry bomb. He also of course occupies exactly the space on the floor that Lebron likes to charge through on the way to the hoop.

I am not willing to say it won't work or can't work, but those who don't think it will have good arguments on their side. Shaq's mystique aside, that was a high risk move. Feel better about it if they had LeBron back under contract -- the contract does expire and they could just jettison the lard bucket and try again wiht anew FA the next season. But with Lebron stiill keeping himself uncommitted, if things turn sour because of the Big Child...just dangerous.
 
If the most pressing issue is that you think Shaq might cost the Cavs LeBron, then I'd say that they'll be okay. I don't think LeBron is going anywhere, whether they win 60 or lose 60. I understand his wanting to test the market, and I know that he wants to push management to get good pieces around him, but I don't think he wants to leave. No one can offer him more money, looking at the landscape right now, no one with cap space for a max contract will be in a better position to win than the Cavs, and as long as he's healthy, his team will have a shot.
 
nate robinson

espn's rumor central said Olympiakos has withdrawn the two-year, $9M offer to Nate Robinson

then chad ford followed it up with

"The Knicks probably can't afford to keep Robinson as they try to re-sign David Lee and clear cap space for LeBron James (and/or others). Look for Sacramento, among other teams, to make a run at him, especially after the Kings made a big play for him at the trade deadline."

are we seriously still looking at nate? i thought according to our front office evans is our guy plus we traded for sergio. and even if we were looking for another pg, sessions and felton are still out there.
 
That exact quote was posted at least two weeks ago. What's the date on Ford's stuff? We aren't going after Robinson.
 
David Lee frustrated, expects to be traded

"I've learned a lot about the process, that's for sure. It's been frustrating. I worked hard in New York for four years. And it's one of those things where on paper it should be a great fit, where you turn around July 1 and say 'OK, what are we going to do to make it fair on both sides?' But it's not that easy -- especially with restricted free agency, so it's been very, very frustrating."

Lee thought the process would be complete by now because the Knicks had shed so much post-2010 salary last season in the Zach Randolph trade. But with Eddy Curry and Jared Jeffries under contract for that season for almost $20 million in combined salary, Lee is getting squeezed.

"Going forward I thought I could still be a big piece of the puzzle -- and it's not as though I'm looking at a max contract, or talking about either me OR LeBron. I thought it was something where we could get something done and they'd still have more than enough left over for what they wanted in the future, but apparently there's some disagreement on that -- just on how the Knicks want to move forward. And I think at this point they're not completely sure what they're going to do and how they want to proceed," Lee said.

Given the torrent of trade rumors he's hearing, Lee expects something to happen over the next two months that will keep him from having to accept the Knicks' qualifying offer of slightly less than $3 million, which would allow him to become an unrestricted free agent in the summer of 2010.

"I know there's a lot of teams that are interested, and a lot of the teams in sign-and-trades interested in me weren't teams that had cap space going into this summer. But there's still Portland with cap space, and there's still teams very interested in sign-and-trades, and there's still New York figuring out what they want to do."

More..
 
Why doesn't he just take the qualifying offer and become unrestricted next season? There seems to be a lot of frustration with some players and restricted free agency right now, but it seems like those who take the 1-year deal can still cash in when they lose the restriction (Ben Gordon, for example).
 
Blazers offer Andre Miller 3 year deal worth $21 million.

ESPN

You know...this has been a bad summer for the Blazers. For the first time in all the years of this rebuild they've been doing, they look like they have no idea how they want to progress. I think some of that may be the owner apparently telling them to accelerate things and build a true contender next year, but still...they have run around throwing big money at a SF (Hedo), a PF (Milsap), and now a PG (Miller). Already whiffed onthe first two. Who knows about Miller. But its just completely scattershot. Three different positions, old guys, young guys. Whatever. Its just clear that they are trying to "make a splash" rather than focused on filling a particular hole with a particular type of player.
 
Last edited:
Blazers offer Andre Miller 3 year deal worth $21 million.

ESPN

Good pickup!

Just saw this and was about to post it. Great pickup for Portland, this should make them even better. So what happens to Bayless now? Do they keep 3 talented PG's on the roster again? Or do they trade Bayless or Blake and upgrade at another position?
 
Just saw this and was about to post it. Great pickup for Portland, this should make them even better. So what happens to Bayless now? Do they keep 3 talented PG's on the roster again? Or do they trade Bayless or Blake and upgrade at another position?

Not sure when they have ever had 3 talented PGs -- closer to a scrub, a journeyman, and a kid.

But in any case, do wonder if Bayless is even more available now. They seemed to want to pick up a SF or PF also this summer. And I wonder if we still have any interest in Bayless? Might make an ideal 3rd quard, and a good pairing next to Evans -- 2 combo guards = 1 PG maybe? Wonder if the Blazers would have an interest in any of our vets? Noc comes to mind, althouhg truth is I never understood what they were doing trying to add even more frontcourt players with at least 5 good ones, and one restive Spanish swingman already in town.
 
Last edited:
Not sure when they have ever had 3 talented PGs -- closer to a scrub, a journeyman, and a kid.

But in any case, do wonder if Bayless is even more available now. They seemed to want to pick up a SF or PF also this summer. And I wonder if we still have any interest in Bayless? Might make an ideal 3rd quard, and a good pairing next to Evans -- 2 combo guards = 1 PG maybe? Wonder if the Blazers would have an interest in any of our vets? Noc comes to mind, althouhg truth is I never understood what they were doing trying to add even more frontcourt players with at least 5 good ones, and one restive Spanish swingman already in town.

Replace talented with servicable. Hey, at least I got the point across ;)

And I'd rather have all 3 of those than Udrih. And the worst of the 3 is now a King
 
Heat Decline To Match Moon's Offer Sheet With Cleveland
The Miami Heat announced Friday that they have declined to match the offer sheet restricted free agent forward Jamario Moon signed with Cleveland, making him a member of the Cavaliers.

“After contemplating Cleveland’s offer to Jamario Moon for the past week, we have decided not to match,” said Heat President Pat Riley. “We declined to match because we want to stay true to our plan of not adding salary to our 2010 cap and matching it would have reduced our flexibility. Michael Beasley will be getting significant minutes at both forward positions and this opens up more opportunities for him to become the player we all expect him to be. We would like to thank Jamario for his contributions to our organization and helping us get back to the playoffs last season. We wish him the best in the future.” Moon was acquired by the Heat from the Toronto Raptors along with Jermaine O’Neal in
http://realgm.com/src_wiretap_archi...ne_to_match_moons_offer_sheet_with_cleveland/
 
I wouldn't mind seeing a Bayless for Noc trade but I can't see us having Evans, Udrih, Rodriguez, and Bayless all playing the 1... It would also mean the last of Bobby J. in Sac. I still don't know if were going to sign him for minimum.
 
I actually took quite a bit from Jerryd Bayless's season despite the poor numbers--he's a volume player who needs to get a feel of things on the court, and when he played 20+ minutes for the Blazers this season, he shot 37-79 (46.8%) from the field. Interestingly, the guy operated mostly as a slasher--he took the majority of his shots around the basket, which was perhaps a wise choice given that his jumper was broke throughout the season. Most importantly, he maintained an enormous free throw rate, carried over in college, and shot them well, so he'll find many ways to score especially once he gets his jumper back in the fold.

I'm operating he's going to get his jumper back, because if he doesn't, his slashing/free throw shooting game, general athleticism (38' vert, great end to end speed) and SG-level passing skills sort of duplicates what Tyreke Evans is going to bring us. It definitely never hurts to have another young player especially in our rebuilding phase, but I'm pretty sure the Blazers are asking for a legitimate player who can produce for them without having a toxic contract/duplicating skillsets/etc. With the toxic contract, I'm not sure if Nocioni is what they want. IMO Bayless stays with the Blazers this season and if he develops well and causes a depth chart problem then the Blazers may dangle him and capitalize on his increased value instead of just his potential.
 
Sources: Gooden to sign 1-year deal

The Dallas Mavericks have struck a deal with unrestricted free agent Drew Gooden to make use of some of the money they got back when Orlando matched their offer sheet earlier this month to restricted free agent Marcin Gortat.

Gooden announced via his Twitter feed shortly past midnight Saturday that he is signing with the Mavericks. "Dallas here I come," he wrote.

Sources with knowledge of the deal told ESPN.com that Gooden is receiving a one-year deal for $4.5 million with incentives that will likely take it beyond $5 million by season's end. A formal announcement is expected Monday or Tuesday.
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?id=4356529
 
other notes:

sorry, I dont want to knit pick but it would help make it more clear who's still on the market:

Damien Wilkins (OKC) -- he was just traded to Washington I believe so he's not an FA

Walter Herrmann (DET) (R) -- signed to play 2 years in Spain

Devon George(TOR) -- was also just traded for Marco Benelli
 
Last edited:
Back
Top