Nets open to trading Williams, Lopez, and Johnson

One trade I can think of is a three team trade with Nets and the Pistons, something like Monroe to Nets, Nick to Pistons and we get Lopez. Obviously, salary needs to be matched, but it shouldn't be a problem.
 
On February 20, 2002, the Celtics traded Joe Johnson, Randy Brown, and Milt Palacio to the Phoenix Suns in exchange for Tony Delk and Rodney Rodgers.

a young joe johnson for tony freaking delk and rodney rogers. hindsight would you do that trade again?
 
nets:
incoming: greg monroe, derrick williams
outgoing: lopez, ak47

sac: ak47 nets 1st pick
outgoing: trade exception, derrick williams

pistons:
in: lopez
out: greg monroe

yeah we're not getting lopez in this trade but if the nets continue on their path we might get a lotto pick. lopez is risky imo bc of his health. not sure if this is doable w/ the trade exception.
 
nets:
incoming: greg monroe, derrick williams
outgoing: lopez, ak47

sac: ak47 nets 1st pick
outgoing: trade exception, derrick williams

pistons:
in: lopez
out: greg monroe

yeah we're not getting lopez in this trade but if the nets continue on their path we might get a lotto pick. lopez is risky imo bc of his health. not sure if this is doable w/ the trade exception.

If the Nets are tearing things down by trading the likes of Lopez et al, why would they trade their pick? The pick would be the last to go (and may have already been dealt to Boston?)
 
On February 20, 2002, the Celtics traded Joe Johnson, Randy Brown, and Milt Palacio to the Phoenix Suns in exchange for Tony Delk and Rodney Rodgers.

a young joe johnson for tony freaking delk and rodney rogers. hindsight would you do that trade again?

The difference is that Lopez is no roleplayer. Healthy, he's a borderline All Star. He's Rik Smits, he's Bill Cartwright, he's Big Z. The health is the gamble here, not the talent. Takentwise you're trading for a 20ppg big man. Its nearly impossible for anythign we have to give up for that to be worth signifciantly more. He's flawed and soft to be a franchise center, but on a team that already has one? Healthy that would be a devastating 1-2 punch inside, best the league has seen in a decade.

Its just the health.
 
If the Nets are tearing things down by trading the likes of Lopez et al, why would they trade their pick? The pick would be the last to go (and may have already been dealt to Boston?)

The Nets notoriously have no picks, like ever. Billy King has destroyed them in almost parody fashion. I believe they don't have full control of their first round pick until 2019. Two are traded, and the other two are on "right to swap" deals with good teams And I think they only have 1 2nd rounder left over that span too. I've never seen anything like it. Its largely what the Stepien rule was designed to prevent, but King found a way around it (no doubt at the behest of the impatient Russian oligarch who thought he could just buy an NBA title).

Anyway, that's why the Nets say they aren't going to rebuild -- they physically cannot They will literally gain no benefit of being bad for another 4 years, so they have to try to waddle on and do what they can to acquire young assets other ways. That's also why if they are truly moving on from Lopez a young lottery pick SG might appeal. Its the only way they can acquire young talent for years.
 
Last edited:
The Nets notoriously have no picks, like ever. Billy King has destroyed them in almost parody fashion. I believe they don't have full control of their first round pick until 2019. Two are traded, and the other two are on "right to swap" deals with good teams And I think they only have 1 2nd rounder left over that span too. I've never seen anythign like it. Its largely what the Stepien rule was designed to prevent, but King found a way around it (no doubt at the behest of the impatient Russian oligarch who though he could just buy an NBA title).

Anyway, that';s why the Nets say they aren;t goign to rebuild -- they physically cannot They will literally gain no benefit of being bad for another 4 years, soi they have to try to waddle on and do what they bcan to acquire young assets other ways. tat's also why if they are truly movign on from Lopez a young lottery pick SG might appeal. Its the only way they can acquire young talent for years.

Dude, what have we told you about typing while driving? :D
 
What about Jarrett Jack? I know he wasn't mentioned as being available but i'd imagine pretty much everyone is available on that roster...

He still doesn't help with the need for 3pt shooters, but he would be an upgrade over sessions. Him and Landry were awesome coming off of the bench a couple of years back when they were both playing on a Warriors team under Malone as an asst. coach. I don't know who we would trade though, but preferably something involving Sessions...
 
We don't want Lopez, he is too injury prone. It only gets worse for big men.

I played around with the idea of Dwill and JJ last night when I first saw the news. But then I saw their salary numbers. It's not worth it unless we are involved as a third team facilitator that gets a nice pick up because of salary caps.
 
This exactly!! People talk like he plays 40 games a year he's only had 2 injury years the rest he's played all 82 besides the 74.

Dude, he's injured RIGHT NOW! And here's the write-up from Yahoo fantasy:

Wed, Dec 10
Brook Lopez (back) will miss Wednesday's game vs. Chicago as expected.

Advice: He is expected to sit out the entire week after an MRI revealed that he had a lower back strain. Lopez can't seem to catch a break as he has been of the most injury-prone players in the league. Owners will have no choice but to bench him until we get a positive report...

His recent past as far as injuries is not encouraging. The fact it's now a back problem is very troubling.
 
Dude, he's injured RIGHT NOW! And here's the write-up from Yahoo fantasy:



His recent past as far as injuries is not encouraging. The fact it's now a back problem is very troubling.

It's hard to say what the issue is without speaking to his doctors or seeing any of the radiologic reports (MRI). The reports I have seen have diagnosed him with a sprain. If there had been a more serious injury that required,say, surgery it likely would have been on the MRI report. Since there wasn't any report of an anatomical problem requiring any procedure, his sprain will likely be managed with conservative care, I would think. It could linger for a few months but there's nothing I have seen to indicate that it is any more serious than that.
 
Three years ago, I would have been all over Lopez, and credit to his talent level, I still have to think about it if he were offered in a trade. You just never trade for damaged goods, and as good a player as he is, in recent history he has watched games from the bench almost as much as he has played in them (might even be the other way around for all I know). Just can't do it, but I still think about it because Lopez and Cousins would make quite the formidable duo... which only works if both are playing.

Detroit is ripe for picking... at this point I would think a significant part of the team is available for trade. Drummond for me! Al Horford would be a great fit too, if Atlanta is willing to take back our garbage (at this point, quite a large if, although D-Will's expiring could be somewhat enticing).
 
It's hard to say what the issue is without speaking to his doctors or seeing any of the radiologic reports (MRI). The reports I have seen have diagnosed him with a sprain. If there had been a more serious injury that required,say, surgery it likely would have been on the MRI report. Since there wasn't any report of an anatomical problem requiring any procedure, his sprain will likely be managed with conservative care, I would think. It could linger for a few months but there's nothing I have seen to indicate that it is any more serious than that.

Peja's back problem was called a sprain at first, too... Just sayin'
 
If Kevin Garrnet agreed to not use his no trade clause I would offer the Nets Williams/Landry for one year of KG, for 15-20 mins a game he can still move on defense and hit the mid range (I'm also fairly certain him and Reggie are great mates as well). Plus the leadership/knowledge he could drop on Cuz for half a season would be nice. I still think KG has one year left in him after this one if he only plays 15-20mins a game and at worst we move on Landry's contract. He's putting up 7points and 8 boards atm plus all the intangibles.

But I doubt even if we are a better team than the Nets he would come here since they will probably make the playoffs with a worse record than us. This is all assuming we can't get someone younger/better which I seriously doubt we can. A lot of other teams cause offer something much better than Landry/Williams to get some of the players we are talking about.
 
If I thought Lopez could stay healthy, you bet. But I don't think that and I don't want to be another team that traded young assets for damaged goods.

You just called Nik an asset. Half the teams in the league would probably just leave him sitting on the curb if you drove up and dropped him off right in front of their arenas for free. Well not free, he's got the contract of a lottery player. The production thus far of a Euro player.

Meanwhile Brook is dominating an East "All Star", dubious as that distinction may have been.
 
You just called Nik an asset. Half the teams in the league would probably just leave him sitting on the curb if you drove up and dropped him off right in front of their arenas for free. Well not free, he's got the contract of a lottery player. The production thus far of a Euro player.

Meanwhile Brook is dominating an East "All Star", dubious as that distinction may have been.

My post was from December when nik was a rookie two months in and Lopez was once again injured.
 
Or Kings could get this year version of him, and be stuck with his monstrous contract for next 2 years, or maybe someone thinks he will exercise his 16/17 ETO? Rudy looked bad, because he was asked to be #1 option with #2 option operating in almost the same way. Williams is playing bad, when he can't move, and does well as #1a/#1b option, when he feels ok, so you're either getting barely any production from your $20 million, or have Boogie, Rudy and D-Will competing for the ball.
And once again Kings main problems were on defensive end, and now people want to get rid of Kings' best perimeter defender for a guy, that barely moves half the time!
 
Lopez is the only one that would work for us... and even then there will be question marks about his role and his first next to Cousins.

Nets will be looking for cap relief, young players and picks.

Problem we don't have our 1st rounder and until Chicago gets that pick we cant trade any of our future 1st rounders.

Williams is our biggest expiring contract and will have work. besides that we could add Hollins.

The salary filling vet role would go to JT or Landry, at this point.

The key will be a young player, it's going to have to be Ben or Nik, Ben has taken a huge leap forward and I think so a extent becomes untouchable because of his potential to be a two way SG the Kings have been looking for years. (Thank god that Josh Smith trade didn't go through) Nik has great potential too, but we would certainly have to give him up in a deal.

2 years of Lopez at 15 million ? I don't think it would work for him or us but I wouldn't be upset if we tried to pull it off.

Put yourself in the Nets position. Who, at this point in time, would you want, Nik or Ben? Logic tells you they would want Ben. No matter what I or you, or anyone one here thinks of Nik's future potential, Ben has moved closer to his potential becoming a reality. To say he's untouchable is more than a bit of a stretch. To my mind, there's only one untouchable player on the Kings, and if New Orleans were to offer me Anthony Davis, and Tyreke Evans and a first round pick for Cousins, I'd seriously have to consider it. Of course that's not going to happen. The Net's are going to want Ben in that deal, and I don't blame them. Lopez is a very good player, when healthy.

Of course his health has to be taken into consideration, and the fact that he could just walk after this coming season, and the remote possibility that he wouldn't even play for you next season since he as a player option on next season. Now I highly doubt he'll walk away from an owed 16 mil, but there's no guarantee he won't. Health wise, he's only played in 168 of a possible 328 games the last four years. So he's missed the equivalent of two entire seasons.
 
Of course his health has to be taken into consideration, and the fact that he could just walk after this coming season, and the remote possibility that he wouldn't even play for you next season since he as a player option on next season.

Actually, Brook can't even be traded right now because of that player option. He'd have to opt in to that (presumably June 30th) in order for a trade to be done, and then there would be a whole year, at which point he could walk. (The post you're responding to is from December, so the timeline has definitely changed since then.)

Whether a trade for Lopez would be a good call, I don't know. He's good when healthy, as you say, but that health is a question mark. Furthermore he has demonstrated that when he's put next to a good rebounder (e.g. KHump) that his rebounding takes an inordinate hit. And he's not the defender we need. Now his brother, on the other hand...
 
You just called Nik an asset. Half the teams in the league would probably just leave him sitting on the curb if you drove up and dropped him off right in front of their arenas for free. Well not free, he's got the contract of a lottery player. The production thus far of a Euro player.

Meanwhile Brook is dominating an East "All Star", dubious as that distinction may have been.

His production is nowhere near close to that of Ginobili, Diaw, Parker, Deng, Giannis, Dragic, Rubio etc etc etc. It's far closer to guys like Johnny Flynn, Aminu, Jeremy Lamb, Adam Morrison and a bunch of other Americans.

See what I did there? ;)
 
Actually, Brook can't even be traded right now because of that player option. He'd have to opt in to that (presumably June 30th) in order for a trade to be done, and then there would be a whole year, at which point he could walk. (The post you're responding to is from December, so the timeline has definitely changed since then.)

Whether a trade for Lopez would be a good call, I don't know. He's good when healthy, as you say, but that health is a question mark. Furthermore he has demonstrated that when he's put next to a good rebounder (e.g. KHump) that his rebounding takes an inordinate hit. And he's not the defender we need. Now his brother, on the other hand...

Yeah, I should have looked at the date on the post. Not the first time I've made that mistake. But hey, nothing like living in the past.
 
Back
Top