Nets might aquire Sonics forward Songaila

captain bill

All-Star
Contrary to reports, the Blazers are not demanding a first round choice as compensation from the Nets in a sign-and-trade transaction for Shareef Abdur-Rahim. The player they want is Mile Ilic, a 7-1, 21-year-old Bosnian drafted No. 43 less than a month ago. New Jersey won't do it. Should Rahim prove unattainable and Donyell Marshall, 30, refuse to back off his insistence on receiving a full mid-level exception, it's believed the Nets find Sonics forward Darius Songalia more attractive than Stromile Swift.
--New York Post

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2005/scorecard/07/15/truth.rumors.nba/index.html


The NY Post: finest reporting around.

Maybe the Kings should actually, you know, try to resign Darius. It would be a shame for us to bring this guy up, develop him, and just let him walk. He's still not a starter, but I think even this year he could become one. I will be very sad if we let him walk. For all the talk about not being too high on K9 and looking for the next PF, we seem to have forgotten about Darius. Well, at least speaking for myself, not really considering the impact he can have in the future. I say we do everything we can to hold on to him, even maybe the MLE. At this point, unless we get something much better to come along, I like keeping Darius. Maybe even sign him to the max (if the price is right). A 6 year deal ain't that bad if we aren't paying him 7+ a year, and getting him locked up cheap could be a major coup a few years down.
 
I don't want to spend the entire MLE on Darius...He's a sixth man, right now, and honestly, I really don't know how much better he can get.

If your gonna spend the MLE on a jumpshooting PF, give it to Marshall...
 
captain bill said:
believed the Nets find Sonics forward Darius Songalia more attractive than Stromile Swift.
--New York Post
not only do i trust because its the ny post but darius played for the sonics?... please..... :rolleyes:
 
As long as Thomas is on the roster, it'd be redundant to resign him. Thomas has the edge in toughness and athleticism, both qualities we need. The full mid level would be way too much, not to mention a 6 year deal. And Darius could very easily get lost in a Thomas/Skinner/Williamson rotation.
 
Songaila has more of an upside being younger. I'd like us to get something else for Thomas, trade him somewhere to rid ourselves of that contract. And I can't see how a 6 year deal would be bad if we didn't overpay him- yeah, we're stuck with him, but barring a massive injury, it just means we don't have to shop for a backup PF for another 6 years (in the worst case scenario). Of course I don't want to pay him max dollars, but 6 years cheap ain't bad. And he'd also be very tradeable, should the need arise.
 
There's only about a 7 month age difference between Darius and Kenny. Once you get to their age there isn't much upside left. There won't be any significant leap if any at all; mainly refinement of skills and applying the knowledge you’ve attained throughout the years.
 
Last edited:
I noted that article yesterday. Keep in mind that: a) its the New York Post; b) its Peter Vescey; c) it seems highly unlikely the Nets would actually prefer Darius so much as settle for him; d) its Peter Vescey; e) he got the goddam team wrong!; and f) its Peter Vescey.

That said, Darius is what he is -- he is not going to get dramatically better, certainly not ever going to become taller, a better athlete, a beast in the post, a shotblocker etc. He showed some nuance in his ability to run the offense last year, but he's nothing you forego other opportunites for, and right now we cannot afford to have him on the roster alongside Brad, Peja, Kenny, Corliss and the rest of the I'm-invisible-down-inside litlle big men.
 
Last edited:
Songaila would be a good fit with the Nets.

He'd be nice to keep, but I think his time with us has come to an end. He's just a role playing reserve, we should have no problem finding someone at least as good to take over his minutes.
 
Bricklayer said:
I noted that article yesterday. Keep in mind that: a) its the New York Post; b) its Peter Vescey; c) it seems highly unlikely the Nets would actually prefer Darius so much as settle for him; d) its Peter Vescey; e) he got the goddam team wrong!; and f) its Peter Vescey.

That said, Darius is what he is -- he is not going to get dramatically better, certainly not ever going to become taller, a better athlete, a beast in the post, a shotblocker etc. He showed some nuance in his ability to run the offense last year, but he's nothing you forego other opportunites for, and right now we cannot afford to have him on the roster alongside Brad, Peja, Kenny, Corliss and the rest of the I'm-invisible-down-inside litlle big men.

Peter Vescey is not that bad....I like his articles about NYN and I. Thomas.....and sometimes he has reliable inside information about ohter teams

 
starks said:
Peter Vescey is not that bad....I like his articles about NYN and I. Thomas.....and sometimes he has reliable inside information about ohter teams

He's as reliable as Sonics' forward Darius Songaila.
 
starks said:
Peter Vescey is not that bad....I like his articles about NYN and I. Thomas.....and sometimes he has reliable inside information about ohter teams


And sometimes he just makes it up. Most of the time actually. Has to fill a column, so what are a few bald-faced lies amongst friends, right?
 
Bricklayer said:
And sometimes he just makes it up. Most of the time actually. Has to fill a column, so what are a few bald-faced lies amongst friends, right?

.....ok, according to you, who is the best bball journalist (worth to read)?
 
starks said:
.....ok, according to you, who is the best bball journalist (worth to read)?

? That is a matter of taste. Personally maybe Michael Wilbon?


But that's got nothing to do with the Viper. Milbon's an excellent writer capable of memorable prose. Viper belongs to a separate class of scummy shuckster rumor-mongerers ala Chad Ford that throw as much **** on the wall as they can and see what sticks. I take everything he says with a giant grain of salt a) because he gets paid to stir things up and doesn't care how he does it; and b) 95% of everything he says is going to happen does not happen, but humans have a tendency to only remember the single hit rather than the 19n misses that preceded it.
 
Bricklayer said:
? That is a matter of taste. Personally maybe Michael Wilbon?


But that's got nothing to do with the Viper. Milbon's an excellent writer capable of memorable prose. Viper belongs to a separate class of scummy shuckster rumor-mongerers ala Chad Ford that throw as much **** on the wall as they can and see what sticks. I take everything he says with a giant grain of salt a) because he gets paid to stir things up and doesn't care how he does it; and b) 95% of everything he says is going to happen does not happen, but humans have a tendency to only remember the single hit rather than the 19n misses that preceded it.

can't agree more... awesome post Brick
 
wait... ahha i didn't read the whole last post. hehe, um yeah, thats true because they have a analyst on NFL all access and everytime he says the seahawks might get someone... they don't. But i still get happy about it, just like kings trade rumors.
 
Last edited:
PV is a complete joke, I've read so many things he's written as sure things that were never even close that I stopped reading his stuff altogether.
 
AHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHA...good 1 NYPost. You guys are awsome reporters! Next time get your teams straight and don't rush it just to make it to the next columns you guys get excited about: UFO's, hairy 8 foot women, and the hizbollah 7-11 attendant in Manhattan. :\
 
captain bill said:
The player they want is Mile Ilic, a 7-1, 21-year-old Bosnian drafted No. 43 less than a month ago. .

to bad hes serbian, aha woww Peter Vescey has to learn about the players in the league before he tries to write about possible signings and trades in the NBA
 
Stoked said:
to bad hes serbian, aha woww Peter Vescey has to learn about the players in the league before he tries to write about possible signings and trades in the NBA

Born in Bosnia however.
 
Bricklayer said:
Born in Bosnia however.

Mile Ilic is a Bosnian Serb. In Bosnia you have Serbs, Croats and muslims. Mile Ilic happens to be a Serb born in Bosnia.
 
Back on the topic:

Peter Vescey is up to his usual standard of excellence. In passing, I also like the title of the thread, which shows up on the forum index as "Nets might acquire Sonics..." I think that would be an interesting, if somewhat unorthodox, trade. Start a trend of hostile takeovers in the NBA?
 
DeAtHrOw said:
Mile Ilic is a Bosnian Serb. In Bosnia you have Serbs, Croats and muslims. Mile Ilic happens to be a Serb born in Bosnia.

Yes, and in America you have...well, pretty much everyone. But they're all still Americans no matter their ethnicity.

Not to put too fine a point on this, but in the West you would normally identify somebody by their nation of residence, not an alleged ethnicity difference. A Sikh born in Britain is still a Brit. I have absolutely no idea what it says on Ilic's passport (and indeed in the wake of the 1990's would guess it says Serbia), but nonetheless can see how Vescey made the simple (if erroneous) deduction -- birthplace = Bosnia, so he is Bosnian (again although he may well have become a Serbian citizen).
 
Bricklayer said:
Yes, and in America you have...well, pretty much everyone. But they're all still Americans no matter their ethnicity.

Not to put too fine a point on this, but in the West you would normally identify somebody by their nation of residence, not an alleged ethnicity difference. A Sikh born in Britain is still a Brit. I have absolutely no idea what it says on Ilic's passport (and indeed in the wake of the 1990's would guess it says Serbia), but nonetheless can see how Vescey made the simple (if erroneous) deduction -- birthplace = Bosnia, so he is Bosnian (again although he may well have become a Serbian citizen).

Actually in the wake of 1990s it would say Yugoslavia but we are getting WAAAAY off topic here and I take the blame for it. :)

Personally I would like to keep D-Song but I do not see it happening.
 
Well, with the Nets reportedly very close to signing Rahim, it appears more likely we might retain Songaila...
 
Back
Top