Bricklayer
Don't Make Me Use The Bat
this made sense given what he Wolves were looking for. and you could say we now turned a 2nd round pick into Derrick Williams, which is a nice tradeup. Maybe.
considering how much Malone was gushing about him and how he felt so relieved that Luc didn't pick up his 6th during one of the possessions prior to the foulout against the Clips, it just shows how worthless the majority of our pieces are on our team.
Simply no value left aside from Cousins, Mac, Isaiah and maybe Vasquez.
Derrick Williams either isn't a very good player or he's stuck in a spot where he can't play his PF spot, is being misued, and generally in a rut. With both players under contract for one more year ... and Moute a pretty middle of the road talent for a team that's looking to roll the dice on low risk moves while waiting on the 2014 draft this makes a lot of sense.
If it works, it's another player to keep which is a list of 3-4 players right now. This could be a home run.
If not, it's 2 million dollars and 1 or 2 wins to take that shot.
The next few months will be rough. I makes sense to march him out mostly a PF and see what happens. Risk v reward it makes sense.
I don't know why a lot of people don't understand other teams won't take our scrubs. Hayes, Jimmer etc. are either negative or neutral value.. I hear names like these mentioned a lot.. To get a piece of value takes giving up skin
It's actually rather easy to complain about it. In our search for a starting sf, we traded the best sf we've had in years and the only good defender on the team for a guy that hasn't played well at sf his 3 year nba career and who doesn't excel at outside shooting, passing or defense, the very things we need most from our sf. At least Luc provided the defense and didn't take bad shots. It also cost us more money.
The only upside here is that he may still have upside. But it hasn't shown up much in 3 years.
Not sure who is disagreeing with that. I personally don't like the trade because of what Luc brings to the table vs what Williams has shown. This isn't a hugely valuable piece. It's a guy who has done next to nothing in 3 years and not only doesn't contribute anything besides potential to the team, he also makes our defense, passing and culture worse.
Just speculating and wondering here but Minnesota stuck with an 8 man rotation tonight. Could there be more parts to this such as adding a Jimmer or PPat or Hayes? These guys didn't play for Minny tonight....Shved, Shabazz Muhammed(didn't the staff like him), Gorgi Deng.
Just speculating and wondering here but Minnesota stuck with an 8 man rotation tonight. Could there be more parts to this such as adding a Jimmer or PPat or Hayes? These guys didn't play for Minny tonight....Shved, Shabazz Muhammed(didn't the staff like him), Gorgi Deng.
I don't necessarily like the trade either. Looks like a tweener kid who hasn't produced in the NBA in the exact same situation as T-Rob for a guy I was envisioning as a key defensive cog in our coming generation ala D.C. I was referring to some of the posts I saw pre-trade in this thread that mentioned scrub names to acquire Williams
This is what's most troubling to me: there's no question that Adelman has, historically, done better with veteran players. But, in order to feel optimistic about this deal, you have to make yourself believe that he was dealing with the Adelman who didn't play Gerald Wallace, and not the Adelman who got good productivity out of Kyle Lowry, Aaron Brooks, Chase Budinger and Carl Landry. It also makes the mistake of comparing those two situations in a vacuum, and ignoring the reason why Wallace didn't play in Sacramento: he was behind a better player (or, at least, a player who fit the role better) on a championship contender, and Adelman couldn't really afford to spend time developing him.It's actually rather easy to complain about it. In our search for a starting sf, we traded the best sf we've had in years and the only good defender on the team for a guy that hasn't played well at sf his 3 year nba career and who doesn't excel at outside shooting, passing or defense, the very things we need most from our sf. At least Luc provided the defense and didn't take bad shots. It also cost us more money.
The only upside here is that he may still have upside. But it hasn't shown up much in 3 years.
This is what's most troubling to me: there's no question that Adelman has, historically, done better with veteran players. But, in order to feel optimistic about this deal, you have to make yourself believe that he was dealing with the Adelman who didn't play Gerald Wallace, and not the Adelman who got good productivity out of Kyle Lowry, Aaron Brooks, Chase Budinger and Carl Landry. It also makes the mistake of comparing those two situations in a vacuum, and ignoring the reason why Wallace didn't play in Sacramento: he was behind a better player (or, at least, a player who fit the role better) on a championship contender, and Adelman couldn't really afford to spend time developing him.
Let's just hope that the reason he hasn't played isn't, in fact, because he's not any good.
Agree, and always "maybe". Can't make real progress without a little risk. Hope it works out.this made sense given what he Wolves were looking for. and you could say we now turned a 2nd round pick into Derrick Williams, which is a nice tradeup. Maybe.
I think there has to be something to Williams that is not immediately evident by the stats etc. After all, NJ, Utah, and New York were supposedly in pursuit as well, with New York offering a piece they feel is valuable in Shumpert. This is one of those situations as a fan where you have to have trust that the FO knows more than you. Maybe there are implications for this in terms of draft position, cap, Luc's durability in the future, whatever, and that we just don't have a tinkering FO who is going to make a bad situation worse
I guess this explains why Luc magically got the start after Malone promised he was going to stick with Salmons in the starting lineup. :/
Look, I am no Derrick Williams fan. People still give him all this credit for being a #2 pick, but you know what? We just got done playing the Wovles #4 pick, Wesley Johnson. That one they took over Cousins. Maybe we can go find Johhny Flynn, who they took #5 as well. Point being being a #2 pick means nothing for him. Fans, and indeed people in general, often buy into hype, especially fro athletes. Ooh, look he can dunk! Yeah, nifty. In a dunk contest maybe. But tweeners are deadly beasts. Normally to their own teams. This year we're seeing it again with Anthony Bennett. Fact of the matter is that Williams has been dumb, soft, inefficient, and unable to carve out a starting role for a team that would have handed it to him. And the only two reasons fans have kept on going ooh! Derrick Williams! Is because he was the #2 pick. And he can dunk. End analysis.
Now all of that said, ALL of that said, and with it said that there will come a day when Mbah a Moute will be precisely the sort of roleplayer we will want piles of, there is a clear theory to trading him for Derrick Williams. Call it Daryl Morey theory. The same way that Morey was running around the last few years shipping off every asset that wasn't tied to a chair on the theory that you need stars to win,a nd he didn't want to acquire anybody who didn't have at least a chance to be a star, well...here we are. We took a 2nd round pick, turned it into a roleplayer, and turned the roleplayer into a former #2 who was thought to have star potential. So it is what it is. You install him at SF, croiss your fingers. If it doesn't work out, then you lose while claiming to be reaching for the stars, and go draft somebody better.
Refreshing to see the Kings jump in on one of these low risk high reward type deals. It's something we've consistently missed out on in years past. Finally a GM who isn't lazy and / or asleep or hogtied by ownership wanting to lose.
Exactly. I love young talent and there are a lot of reasons guys get lost on teams. Williams lost playing time to inferior players because they defended, bought into a system where they ball moved and played with consistent effort. He didn't.
On a team that is trying to change their culture, trading the guy that embodied those characteristics bums me out. Not because Luc was going to make us a champion. But because his presence made us play less like losers.