Says here that we're looking at the "Anaheim Royals", "Los Angeles Royals", "Orange County Royals" and "Anaheim Royals of Southern California".
This is strange given the fact that there is lease mandating that any team that moves in the Honda Center have "Anaheim in front of the team name and be the sole geographic identifier". That would eliminate LA, OC or "Anaheim Royals of Southern California" since "Southern California" should be considered a geographic identifier.
I wonder if they are trying to negotiate a deal. When the Angels got to add "Los Angeles" to the front of their name, they claimed that it would bring in more corporate sponsors. It's possible that the Maloofs are telling Samueli that they can get X amount of extra sponsors if they are named after LA or OC instead of Anaheim and that they will share half of "X" with him and that they should be able to renegotiate the lease as a result of that.
http://www.kcra.com/news/27219777/detail.html
This is strange given the fact that there is lease mandating that any team that moves in the Honda Center have "Anaheim in front of the team name and be the sole geographic identifier". That would eliminate LA, OC or "Anaheim Royals of Southern California" since "Southern California" should be considered a geographic identifier.
I wonder if they are trying to negotiate a deal. When the Angels got to add "Los Angeles" to the front of their name, they claimed that it would bring in more corporate sponsors. It's possible that the Maloofs are telling Samueli that they can get X amount of extra sponsors if they are named after LA or OC instead of Anaheim and that they will share half of "X" with him and that they should be able to renegotiate the lease as a result of that.
http://www.kcra.com/news/27219777/detail.html