I sure as hell would: at least, with SCV's, you're only going to give up a third as many transition points.Feels like some people here would prefer shot clock violation TOs instead of forced ones.
I sure as hell would: at least, with SCV's, you're only going to give up a third as many transition points.Feels like some people here would prefer shot clock violation TOs instead of forced ones.
For the last 8 years it's always the coach or management, at some point we have to realise it's the players on the floor and the fact every season we are missing a key element to any successful franchise and that's a shot blocker and steady vets who don't beat themselves.
We are not a good team yet, even with Cousins we were consistently and almost in all our losses (even in some of our wins) beating ourselves, good teams don't beat themselves on a regular basis, but we do.
"I thanked players in there for their effort."
"Proud of how my guys competed, proud of the effort we put forth."
Our record (w/o Cuz) would indicate this to be true. IMO, there is no indication that Malone is getting anything out of his talent.
Sure, you would prefer SCV to just throwing the ball off that allows transition opportunities for your opponent, but you would only do it, if you know in advance, that this sequence of passes would lead to a TO, and one thing I'm sure of is that no NBA player is passing the ball with the intention to commit a TO. It's just poor judgement of the situation and flawed decision-making.I sure as hell would: at least, with SCV's, you're only going to give up a third as many transition points.
The turnovers are spiking without cousins. That's a fact.https://twitter.com/aaronbruski/status/544004261193846785
"MM: “Turnovers, and the inability to make shots just haunted us tonight.”
Same thing every night. "Uh we turned the ball over too much, uhhh , we gotta stop doing that, uh, no I will not make an effort to correct this season long problem, uhh we need Cousins back and then I promise I will be a good coach again"
You may be right. Ty Corbin is just sitting on the bench one row behind him waiting.Malone said that, huh? Now I wish I hadn't just deleted that stinkburger after the end of the game, because I'd like to have heard the post-game presser. I don't know how those quotes sounded, but they read like quotes from a man who knows he's being fired, honestly.
The turnovers are spiking without cousins. That's a fact.
The reason knowledge able basketball people and media aren't blaming the coach every game is because that is flat out wrong. It's a talent issue. Plain and simple.
I am not saying malone is perfect. But 100% of the problem? That's the position a small minded moron takes. Almost 3600 posts, 100 something likes. No one likes you or what you have to say.
Block time. You're the only one. Congrats! Good day sir!
Yeah, I agree. There's something missing in the way this team responds to stress. And that certainly could be on the coach.The whole talent issue thing would be a lot more believable if we simply fell behind and never came close. Look at the Sixers earlier in the season - they were losing many games by a huge margin, often falling behind by great amounts in the first half alone. We on the other hand, led the Lakers most of the way, led the Rockets most of the way. Same with the Pacers game that we darn near lost. The Lakers are not a more talented team than us, even without Cousins. Nor are the Rockets without Howard, Jones and Canaan. And some of these teams were playing on a back to back too.
We certainly aren't the most talented team without Cousins, but we aren't the least either, and should have won some of these games that we lost. It's not 100% Malone's fault - it's rarely EVER 100% anyone's fault. But I do think some here are absolving him too much. Coaches aren't there only to manage rotations in games. It's true that the players are at fault for not executing, but when it happens time and time again it's clear that something sets apart good coaches from bad ones, and it's not just the talent on the team.
The whole talent issue thing would be a lot more believable if we simply fell behind and never came close. Look at the Sixers earlier in the season - they were losing many games by a huge margin, often falling behind by great amounts in the first half alone. We on the other hand, led the Lakers most of the way, led the Rockets most of the way. Same with the Pacers game that we darn near lost. The Lakers are not a more talented team than us, even without Cousins. Nor are the Rockets without Howard, Jones and Canaan. And some of these teams were playing on a back to back too.
You may be right. Ty Corbin is just sitting on the bench one row behind him waiting.
You're wrong. He was at the last game.Better look at the last few games. Corbin hasn't been there.
Certain people are probably going to jump all over me for making this analogy, but this is starting to remind me of how everything was Rick Adelman's fault for his last couple years here even as the roster was falling apart and none of his Kings teams failed to make the playoffs. Nothing I say is going to change your minds, but I suggest those of you who strongly believe that Mike Malone is the problem should take a step back from your disappointment over the last half dozen tough losses and realize that there's four months of basketball left to be played this season and sometime soon we'll be in position to add a top 5 center to our roster and play a whole slew of cupcake Eastern conference teams. Have you already forgotten that we played the toughest schedule in the league the first month and looked damn good doing it? We don't start this season 9-5 without Mike Malone. Close losses are tough, but let's maintain some perspective here.
Best post I've read in weeks. Bravo!The turnovers are spiking without cousins. That's a fact.
The reason knowledge able basketball people and media aren't blaming the coach every game is because that is flat out wrong. It's almost equally a talent issue. Who you blame depends on your place in the organization. As a fan, I'm split.
I am not saying malone is perfect. But 100% of the problem?
Another well thought out post. The posts thinking Malone is in jeopardy of being fired.....I just am flabbergasted at that thought process. As far as that interview after the game and how he answered some questions......... I personally think that because of the death of Ryan Hollins' father and the fact that Hollins was there in the locker room probably changes Malones usual "matter of fact" assessments post game.Certain people are probably going to jump all over me for making this analogy, but this is starting to remind me of how everything was Rick Adelman's fault for his last couple years here even as the roster was falling apart and none of his Kings teams failed to make the playoffs. Nothing I say is going to change your minds, but I suggest those of you who strongly believe that Mike Malone is the problem should take a step back from your disappointment over the last half dozen tough losses and realize that there's four months of basketball left to be played this season and sometime soon we'll be in position to add a top 5 center to our roster and play a whole slew of cupcake Eastern conference teams. Have you already forgotten that we played the toughest schedule in the league the first month and looked damn good doing it? We don't start this season 9-5 without Mike Malone. Close losses are tough, but let's maintain some perspective here.
We are all aware of the absence of Cousins when we make our criticism if the coaching. While Cousins is out is exactly when I can see what type if coach he is. I'm watching execution and adjustments. Not wins and losses.
Agree mostly with all your post. But playing devil's advocate and/or addressing Malone's offense and defensive philosophy.....Malone is an issue. A coach's job, flat out, is to put the team and its talent in the best situation possible to succeed. Malone isn't doing that. We've get a very poor offensive system which doesn't create easy looks, even when Cuz is out there. Lineups and sub patterns are highly questionable at times. While Malone talks defense, his small ball, non-defensive lineups say otherwise and he's not all that good at making in-game adjustments.
However, this is also a coach who with Cuz had us playing at a playoff level in the West and was a coaching a team that could knock off any team on any given night. That was with a terrible bench we got nothing from most nights. Maybe the worst bench in the league.
We'll have a problem if our FO and Vivek use Malone as a scapegoat. The real problem is the lack of talent on this roster and the inability to address weaknesses which have plagued us for years. If our FO and Vivek think canning the coach and promoting Corbin answers most of our issues, they're completely miscalculating the talent on the roster they put together. While we were busy trying to sign Jordan Crawford who's now in China, 3rd bigs were getting signed around the league.
Both Malone and the team are far too dependent on Cuz. The underlying theme is we don't have enough talent once he went down. With all due respect to Omri, when his absence is this noticeable, it's largely due to a lack of talent throughout the roster.
While Malone talks defense, his small ball, non-defensive lineups say otherwise
Another well thought out post. The posts thinking Malone is in jeopardy of being fired.....I just am flabbergasted at that thought process. As far as that interview after the game and how he answered some questions......... I personally think that because of the death of Ryan Hollins' father and the fact that Hollins was there in the locker room probably changes Malones usual "matter of fact" assessments post game.
Cousins likes Coach Malone.......end of discussion. You don't think Vivek realizes that?!? And as Hardboiled said above, Malone has to be given credit for the early record. You don't start talking about firing a guy now that they can't win without Cousins. That's just moronic.
My friend this forum is getting comical and borderline unreadable with the malone hate it's reaching IT nut huggers level. People in here probably blame malone for cousins getting sick. They want ball moving to be at spurs level shut that poopoo up only 2 teams move the ball like that and it's spurs/GS. You know what they have I'm common ****ing all stars and solid players all there 10th man would be our 6th man. They think Corbin is the 2nd coming when on reality he was a failure in Utah. These same people gave malone 0 credit when we win and we win dispite him to them.
It really depends how great a roster Vivek and PDA think they gave malone. I think we know they think they've done a good job. And Malone is the outsider in that love fest. Personally, I don't blame the coach entirely, but I'd bet you Vivek and PDA do.
You really may be right. Malone may not last till the all star break. Those quotes are from a defeated man who sees the writing on the wall.
Him and harbaugh can hang out. Harbaugh may be fired at halftime today.
I've gotta admit, my best instincts do blame Malone to a certain extent. Trolls (problem now solved) have me defending the 100% Malone's fault position on the basis that nothing is ever 100%. But, it's at least 50-75%. And that might be just too much for Vivek and his crony to take much longer.
I agree the talent is equally a problem. There's a large drop off between rudy and the next guy. There's a few that can fill that role on any given night. But most nights, it's going to be a struggle. But there's enough talent there to beat the Pistons, lakers, and magic. It's just sloppy ugly disorganized basketball. That IS on the coach to a certain extent.
The "judging on wins and losses" line? I believe that was directed at Malone.
Yep, he's in trouble and knows it. Those quotes were illuminating.
On the contrary, I'd prefer SCV to them attempting to do anything on offense, when we don't have at least three of our Opening Night starters on the court. I didn't say anything about passing the ball, but I don't want them to do that, either. And this isn't a new sentiment; I was saying this back when we were 5-1.Sure, you would prefer SCV to just throwing the ball off that allows transition opportunities for your opponent, but you would only do it, if you know in advance, that this sequence of passes would lead to a TO, and one thing I'm sure of is that no NBA player is passing the ball with the intention to commit a TO. It's just poor judgement of the situation and flawed decision-making.
We don't start this season 9-5 without Mike Malone. Close losses are tough, but let's maintain some perspective here.
True, but in a lot of those wins and losses one can clearly see the consistently terrible coaching with regards to match-ups, substitution patterns, and instituting the needed in-game adjustments. And like you said we could have been easily 11-3, but again we weren't, and I put the blame on Malone's poor coaching as evident on those games we lose.And I agree that the execution at the end of games has been wanting. It's fair to say Malone isn't the best Xs and Os coach in the game, but that's fine. That's not what he was brought in for. And I do think he's getting better in that area, or was getting better before the injuries shifted the lineup.
I hope you realized those 3 are an awesome 3 and can match-up pound for pound with any other big three in this league (except probably Cleveland and OKC).I'm not suggesting Malone is a good coach but the thing is he's never had a good team to coach other than when we have Cousins/Gay/Collison all healthy and when he does we have whopped Portland/Clippers/Spurs/Suns @there home and Bulls and are like 7-3 and if it were not for a bad call should have beaten the Grizzlies and were up 20 points on a explosive Dallas team on THERE home floor.