Blob
Starter
I didn't say this. Straw man.So too many high IQ players is a bad thing now. Ridiculous
I didn't say this. Straw man.So too many high IQ players is a bad thing now. Ridiculous
Well, those guys are all playing defense except Amare, even Blake until recently. And Blake developed as a playmaker which increased his offensive value. Do you see Bagley developing as a playmaker? It's a big leap to suggest he will be a playmaker because it's rare for bigs.Where are all these 20/10 athletic freak pfs that never play for a winner? I can think of Malone, Kemp, Amare, and Blake. Do you have some other good comps cause those guys are all big time winners.
It's rare for bigs because they don't ususally have the ball a bunch. Most of the good bigs in the game (ad, demarcus, kat, blake) significantly improved their offensive game as a whole once they got to the nba. Usually happens fairly quickly too. The extra spacing surely helps these types of players. Bagley averaged more assists than demarcus and was just a little short of Blake. You really can't tell how he'll develop in that regard but I think he has a decent chance of being a plus passer for a big.Well, those guys are all playing defense, even Blake until recently. And Blake developed as a playmaker wich increased his offensive value. Do you see Bagley developing as a playmaker? It's a big leap to suggest he will be a playmaker because it's rare for bigs.
No, bigs do have the ball a bunch. There have been plenty of bigs with +30 USG. The 90's was all about dumping the ball into the big man.It's rare for bigs because they don't ususally have the ball a bunch. Most of the good bigs in the game (ad, demarcus, kat, blake) significantly improved their offensive game as a whole once they got to the nba. Usually happens fairly quickly too. The extra spacing surely helps these types of players. Bagley averaged more assists than demarcus and was just a little short of Blake. You really can't tell how he'll develop in that regard but I think he has a decent chance of being a plus passer for a big.
Yeah, I was talking about in college. Most of these guys weren't as big a part of their team's offenses in college as they became in the pros.No, bigs do have the ball a bunch. There have been plenty of bigs with +30 USG. The 90's was all about dumping the ball into the big man.
We have no reliable intel that suggest what Vlade truly wants. The kings have been actually very good at keeping people guessing.Vivek needs to stay out of it! Stay in your lane pip squeak! I thought our owner learned his lesson from Nik Rocks Fiasco?! While it is true our GM does NOT inspire confidence and opens himself to second guessing with his track record of buffoonery, Vivek hired him! Let him do his job or fire him. You want to weigh in with your opinion, fine. But ultimately the decision is not yours to make! InVivekVladeBrandon I Trust.
Likable kid, wish him the best....on the Grizzlies.
I don't think i've ever seen Marvin dribble the ball with his right hand more than twice time on a drive or one power dribble on the left block where he will incorrectly go back to his left hand and expose it to shot blocking.Yeah, I was talking about in college. Most of these guys weren't as big a part of their team's offenses in college as they became in the pros.
Yeah he definitely needs practice and coaching to reach all star level potential.I don't think i've ever seen Marvin dribble the ball with his right hand more than twice time on a drive or one power dribble on the left block where he will incorrectly go back to his left hand and expose it to shot blocking.
If Sacramento is "obviously a great city" then why don't you come to visit? What a phony. And if the Kings didn't extend an invitation to you then just say you did not have the opportunity to visit. I get sick and tired of these phony comments from the likes of Porter and JJJ. Thank God they will be playing elsewhere.
I wouldn't buy into all that crap narrative that players don't want to be her
Bagley does make good reads out of the post or if he catches a pass as a roll man and the defense overhelps. What I haven't seen is him being able to create plays with his dribble for other people which is exceedingly rare for a big. Blake can do it and while Draymond isn't a tarditional big man he can also do it. Jokic also can do it, even if does does most of his brilliant work as a hub in the high post. The guy can run the fast break as a ball handler and make plays for others. Jokic is the best offensive big man in the nba and is still behind quite a few wings and guards.Bagley has decent passing chops for a big guy. He, Ayton and JJJ were all in line with each other and could go either way in the NBA. Carter is the best passer of the lottery guys and Bamba is the worst.
You want all your guys to be able to pass the ball. Bagley doesn't have to be Webber but you don't want him forcing through double teams when a kick out to the corner results in a wide open 3. What you don't want is a coach like Joerger coming in and running the offense through frickin Willie Cauley Stein a good percentage of the time. Talk about an inefficient way to run an offense. Teach these big guys how to pass out of double teams and make quick interior passes. They shouldn't be standing at the elbow scanning the floor while their defenders sags off them into the paint.
I just watched Scot Pollards take on the draft though and he believes that Bagley is the best player in the draft and wouldn't touch Doncic in the top 10. Pollard isn't a "draft expert" but hes been right many times in the past which makes me respect his opinion.
I just watched Scot Pollards take on the draft though and he believes that Bagley is the best player in the draft and wouldn't touch Doncic in the top 10. Pollard isn't a "draft expert" but hes been right many times in the past which makes me respect his opinion.
Has he though? List them.![]()
Has he though? List them.![]()
He thinks no team in the top 10 should touch Luka. That is just absurd. You have all these teams that are clammoring to move up into 2/3 to pick Luka and yet Pollard thinks he shouldn't go top 10.
He said that more because he hasn't seen much of him. He made that clear.He thinks no team in the top 10 should touch Luka. That is just absurd. You have all these teams that are clammoring to move up into 2/3 to pick Luka and yet Pollard thinks he shouldn't go top 10.
McLemore and TRob flopping are the two I'm familiar with. Don't know who he's called that would be stars though.
I just recall looking back on his thoughts and going, man he was right. Not just on Thomas Robinson too. If there was a definitive list i'd give it to you but my memory doesn't contain it. I'm open to being proven wrong though. Regardless I think Scott Pollard is very intelligent.
Right and he also said we should take Frank Mason over Josh Jackson last year. The idea that Pollard is some kind of draft guru because he accurately predicted two Kansas guys not improving in the NBA (nevermind that they were both surrounded by the most dysfunctional coaching/front-office situation in the league while they were here) feels apocryphal to me.
I also recall him telling Grant that Buddy would bust.Right and he also said we should take Frank Mason over Josh Jackson last year. The idea that Pollard is some kind of draft guru because he accurately predicted two Kansas guys not improving in the NBA (nevermind that they were both surrounded by the most dysfunctional coaching/front-office situation in the league while they were here) feels apocryphal to me.
Right and he also said we should take Frank Mason over Josh Jackson last year. The idea that Pollard is some kind of draft guru because he accurately predicted two Kansas guys not improving in the NBA (nevermind that they were both surrounded by the most dysfunctional coaching/front-office situation in the league while they were here) feels apocryphal to me.