OptimusRhyme
Jive Turkey
Bucks fans sayin The Prince had knee surgery last year and wasnt the same player at all when he came back... hopefully he can regain form and health..
Bucks fans sayin The Prince had knee surgery last year and wasnt the same player at all when he came back... hopefully he can regain form and health..
When you think about it, its actually very similar to the move Petrie made last year with Johnson. That too was a 2nd round pick for a decently youngish SF/PF defender type intended to take Salmons' place. I just think this one is more disciplined (after years under Skiles you'd have to be) has a better chance to not be disruptive on offense.
Faith in humanity has been restored.
Young hard-nosed defender and should not take away shots from MCL and DMC.
Most of the people who like this trade are the ones who were accused of being irrational, emotional, fanatics for the past week. The people making those accusations have mostly left. That's why it's calmed down.
is he intended to be our starting SF? has the FO spoken about it?
We need to standardize these abbreviations. I was trying to figure out why DMC needed shots for his MCL.
Luc Richard Mbah A Moute = LRMAM?
Ben McLemore = BMac?
Just tossin some suggestions out there.
PG grievis vasquez
SG ben mclemore
SF luc richard mbah a moute
PF jason thompson/patrick patterson
C demarcus cousins
Luc= LRMAM
Ben= BMac
Cousins= DFC
Isaiah Thomas= IT
Marcus Thornton= MT
Jason Thompson= JT
Salmons= Fish
Ray McCallum= RMac
Ben = Big Mac no BMac
Or they read everything, and don't feel compelled to post and defend the front office from pitchforks due to the generally favorable response.
RMac and BMac are too close to each other. Ben and Ray are shorter.
And so is Luc. No need to type MORE letters for abbreviations.
I just don't quite understand the Carl Landry deal. Nor will I quite understand a potential Monta Ellis deal.
Or they read everything, and don't feel compelled to post and defend the front office from pitchforks due to the generally favorable response.
Everything we've done this off-season is to enhance Boogie's game.Surround him with high IQ, high character Bball talent that can be a great influence on him on and off the floor.
Here's my question. How do you know Boogie doesn't want to play with Monta? Maybe Boogie said he'd love to play with Monta when he met with our FO? We really don't know
Here's my deal with Cousins. He's absolutely a guy who's going to get the max. Whether from us, or from someone else, the bigs market is absolutely nuts right now. So he'll get his money. What's key for me, even above improvement in his game, is to see growth in his maturity. No more excuses about being "young" or not liking "coach", or the million other excuses he's had since he's been a pro for his outbursts. It's time for him to prove he's capable (and willing) to be a franchise player in the NBA. And everything that entails.
RMac and BMac are too close to each other. Ben and Ray are shorter.
And so is Luc. No need to type MORE letters for abbreviations.
Plus there's no A in mclemore. I've been using bmc.
have we, though? I'll give you McLemore, but apart from that...Vasquez looked great in a system where he absolutely dominated the ball, how he'll look with it out of his hands, when we run the offense through Cuz remains to be seen. he's also a poor shooter and an absolute liability on defense, meaning he won't stretch the floor, nor help alleviate pressure on the defensive end. Landry is, at best, an awkward fit next to Cuz on offense and a terrible one on defense. Luc will help cut off penetration some, but he can't stretch the floor either, meaning, should he start (which he absolutely must, considering there's nobody on the bench he could use his one-on-one wizardry on), we'll probably end up relying on McLemore and PPat for shooting, unless we want opposing defenses to once more absolutely pack the paint against us.
basketball wise, I don't see any of the three particularly enhancing Cuz game.