Logo - change or keep? (retitled with poll added)

What should we do about the logo?


  • Total voters
    59
  • Poll closed .

Merdiesel

Starter
Rumors are we're bringing back the late 80's baby blues this year for our alternate uni's...

I'd rather we go with the early 90's blue

Kings-History-MitchTrade.jpg


and These

Webber.jpg


I just think the baby blue doesn't fit our teams toughness.
 
I own the swingman version of the black one of Chris Webber and it's still my fav.

I think they brought that back to sell to fans last year but its not really the same. The jerseys nowadays are all way too long, the dumb "length + 2" thing. SMH
 
The problem I have with the new black jerseys is they is way too much white.... If it could have more focus on the black and purple I think it'd be much better.
 
Those royal blue ones were the best. I always wanted to see those brought back. (top pic in the thread with Richmond)
 
There is no pride in wearing baby blue. Ever.

The lone exception is UNC. The Tarheels somehow pull it off.

Funny thing is, and some Kings fans may already know this, that the powder blue jersey's were a complete mistake. The road uni's were supposed to be royal blue -- just like they were in KC and just like the royal blue trim on the home jerseys -- but the manufacturer screwed up. By the time the mistake was discovered, it was too late to fix in time for the season so they went with what they had.

Why on earth we'd want to revert to a uniform that was a complete mistake and sort of embodies much of our early (and recent) history in Sacramento is beyond me.

I say they bury those things in New Mexico right next to where they buried all those old Atari cartridges --- and throw in the gold throw backs while they're at it.
 
No. Just no.

Our logo is incredible and the colors completely fit in with the name of the team. Not everything needs to be changed.
Eh, maybe our colors can stay, but our logo needs to be re-branded. It looks really silly imo.. whoever designed it broke one of the firsts logo rules ever.. make it timeless. Ours screams 1995 lol

It's time for change! We need a new logo and we're going to start a new era. I secretly hope we go back to royal blue for our primary color. As much as purple has been nice, royal blue is just much better. Purple can always be an alternative jersey..
 
Eh, maybe our colors can stay, but our logo needs to be re-branded. It looks really silly imo.. whoever designed it broke one of the firsts logo rules ever.. make it timeless. Ours screams 1995 lol

It's time for change! We need a new logo and we're going to start a new era. I secretly hope we go back to royal blue for our primary color. As much as purple has been nice, royal blue is just much better. Purple can always be an alternative jersey..

Logo is cool and has been for a long time. Its theme specific. Even if it were dated, which its not, you don't see the Celtics or Spurs running around flipping their logos around, and if the Clippers do here this summer the pics of the new one that's supposedly taking its place are a bad joke.

this works:
nba-sacramento-kings-houston-rockets2-850x560.jpg
 
Logo is cool and has been for a long time. Its theme specific. Even if it were dated, which its not, you don't see the Celtics or Spurs running around flipping their logos around, and if the Clippers do here this summer the pics of the new one that's supposedly taking its place are a bad joke.

this works:
nba-sacramento-kings-houston-rockets2-850x560.jpg
There is nothing about this that is dated. It is classic and timeless. Powerful. The crown, the lances, the banner, the ball. It is far more intricate and meaningful than most logo's. As Brick said this logo is cool and has been for a long time.
 
Also, our current color scheme is perfect. Purple is the color of royalty. The fact that the lakers also use purple should have no impact on how appropriate it is for OUR identity. WTF is a 'laker' anyway?? Let them pick a different color. Purple belongs to us. Gold I find tawdy and ostentatious, besides which, it does NOT translate to a color that can be worn on the court (reference the god awful gold jerseys and the laker version of which is personally best described as pee yellow) I see the silver as representative of a knights armor. Purple, Silver, Black for power. Why would you want to change that? and to what??
 
Also, our current color scheme is perfect. Purple is the color of royalty. The fact that the lakers also use purple should have no impact on how appropriate it is for OUR identity. WTF is a 'laker' anyway?? Let them pick a different color. Purple belongs to us. Gold I find tawdy and ostentatious, besides which, it does NOT translate to a color that can be worn on the court (reference the god awful gold jerseys and the laker version of which is personally best described as pee yellow) I see the silver as representative of a knights armor. Purple, Silver, Black for power. Why would you want to change that? and to what??

I think sometimes people just want change to mix things up for the sake of change.

I think that if we changed our logo everyone would be begging to get it back because only then would some realize how nice it is compared to most logos.
 
Yeah, count me as one who really likes the Kings logo. I don't see any reason to change it.

As for the uniforms my 1-10 ranking of the road jerseys (from my favorite to least favorite) would go something like this:

1. The early 90's Royal Blue
hay4efj2pocfp9zjtmwff2eem.gif

2. The current black alternates
5kfkr5g0shjgavr37b8plrugp.gif

3. Mid 90's to early 2001 Black & Purple
heji7agw59ll21pphnvx4btjt.gif

4. The late 90's to early 2000 purple alternates
g8beypl60ledelp9bth9lxwne.gif

5. Mid 80's powder blue
uj1f1iilfq9mp9ruqa6hb2nmo.gif

6. Early to mid 2000's purple with "Sacramento" on the front
fb3afhgjm2x8w3oet4mpnafh3.gif


7. The current uniform
e2dgf3pugmxy7nvgj31hs8le2.gif



8. The split purple/black with the checkerboard sides
cxn2wgcl8onwair6oo25ezrmy.gif







9. The gold jerseys
9fca52nx6hm37faqeldl812ut.gif








10. Any future jersey with sleeves.
 
Last edited:
I don't think the Kings will ever go back to the Royal Blue jerseys because it's too radical a departure from the black and purple and it shares the color scheme with the throwback Rochester jerseys.

I do wish they'd change the font for "Sacramento" or "Kings" on the jerseys though. I don't care for the current lettering. And even though it matches the logo (and should satisfy my OCD tendencies) I don't like the previous font either. In fact the only one I really like is the old school script lettering.
 
Logo is cool and has been for a long time. Its theme specific. Even if it were dated, which its not, you don't see the Celtics or Spurs running around flipping their logos around, and if the Clippers do here this summer the pics of the new one that's supposedly taking its place are a bad joke.

this works:

This is our logo
2000px-Sacramento_Kings_logo.svg.png


Everything about it screams retro. The grey is unnecessary added onto it. Even the font looks a little funky.

Most 1st year computer graphic students would tell you this logo sucks cause there's not a lot appeasing about it.

We've all grown used to it, but our logo sucks if you take a look at it from afar without the Fan goggles.

Maybe we should add grey to our jerseys since a lot of this does have grey.
 
Back
Top