Logo - change or keep? (retitled with poll added)

[Capt. Factorial]

http://grantland.com/the-triangle/the-definitive-nba-logo-rankings/?ex_cid=story-twitter

Zach Lowe on NBA logos. Any guesses on where the Kings ranked?

I'm going to guess dead last before checking out the article.

Edit: Well, could have been worse. Still, no Zach, there is not a shield there on the primary logo. Lances, ball, crown, banner, name. It's not that hard, really.

 

[funkykingston]

Just to bump this back up, I think the Bucks hit it out of the park with their new uniforms, logo, tertiary logo and court design. And because the work was done by a small design firm there's a lot of info on the process.

http://espn.go.com/nba/story/_/id/13013410/bucks-new-uniforms-hit
http://espn.go.com/nba/story/_/id/12664472/inside-look-milwaukee-bucks-logo-redesign

The deer logo isn't perfect (a little too artificially tough looking IMO), the secondary logo is a bit too simple and boring and I wish they kept the drop shadow on the lettering but the color scheme is awesome, the tie-ins to the city are fantastic and overall it's really clean and simple design but with lots of subtle touches that make it great.

To me this is the team the Kings should be taking cues from as far as a redesign. Be willing to make dramatic changes while keeping enough reference to franchise history and with lots of things that connect the design to Sacramento.

 

[celtics33]

TBH, as long as we don't give in to these stupid looking handball jerseys I'll be ok...

By far the worst ever. Yes, these are worse than our gold ones. They look like camp counselors.

I hope for them to have signed a big contract with some fast-food chain...

 

[celtics33]

Please, please, please, no sleeves.

Word!

 

[celtics33]

So basically we're going to look like these guys:

the L.A. Nurses

 

[celtics33]

Am I the only one who always see the Pacman in this?

Now this was REALLY funny!