Landry for Beasley?

[Kingster]

Beasley and "X" for Noc. What have you got to lose?

 

[Capt. Factorial]

Beasley and "X" for Noc. What have you got to lose?

The idea is that Miami might dump Beasley for cap space. Nocioni does not provide cap space, so that's not really within the (hypothetical) parameters of a Beasley acquisition.

 

[deekay2o9]

Saw a couple games in college. I thought he would be another Melo. Haven't seen much of him in the NBA.

Mandry's hustle is contagious and he's a great locker room guy. He's also the only low post thread we have right now. He also produces 100x more testosterone than Measley Beasley.

 

[Larry David]

The only way to get great is to gamble on a talented player turning it around. It worked last time.

Webber was not the last time. That would be Ron Ron. Your results may vary.

 

[bajaden]

Webber was not the last time. That would be Ron Ron. Your results may vary.

It has something to do with Quantum Physics I believe.... Sounds good anyway..

 

[Nighthawk1]

Another undersized PF for the team?

Isn't it enough that we have an undersized PF in Landry to open our eyes to the glaring problem attached to getting one?

Landry is palatable because he is a very hardworking kid.

But to add another undersized PF and an under-achieving lazy player like Beasley?

No.

We are not assembling a team to win Championship at D-league.

I agree. For the amount of bellyaching about our rebounding why would we want to go after another undersized PF who doesn't/can't rebound?

 

[Kingster]

I don't know enough about Beasley to make a judgement. But I do know enough about Riley. If he wants to unload him, then I'd stay clear. The seller typically knows more than the buyer, and with Riley I think he knows considerably more.