Kingsfan23
All-Star
Not happy at all with De’Aaron.. His play has been devoid of the same energy since he first got smashed against Wall as a starter it seems to me.. just not what we saw the first stretch in terms of attacking etc
I don’t understand why it appears so many offensive sets are run for WCS. I don’t understand this team’s strategy.
Buddy has been playing good since coming off the bench. Sadly, our only consistent player it seems... who would've thought?
No, your not crazy. In this instance at leastam I crazy? I swore I saw a Brick appearance............................
Hey, next game at Atlanta who is turrruble. They got two wins we got three, should be loads of fun!
He was just never as good or polished as some people made him out to be. Lots of people kept with constant John Wall comparisons that made absolutely no sense to me. Just from a physical standpoint, Wall was 6'4 196lbs. Fox was 6'3 169lbs. Yet, people constantly kept with the "he's more athletic and quicker than Wall!" talks...despite 19yearold Wall being more athletic and physically dominant than Fox.Not happy at all with De’Aaron.. His play has been devoid of the same energy since he first got smashed against Wall as a starter it seems to me.. just not what we saw the first stretch in terms of attacking etc
He was just never as good or polished as some people made him out to be. Lots of people kept with constant John Wall comparisons that made absolutely no sense to me. Just from a physical standpoint, Wall was 6'4 196lbs. Fox was 6'3 169lbs. Yet, people constantly kept with the "he's more athletic and quicker than Wall!" talks...despite 19yearold Wall being more athletic and physically dominant than Fox.
Believe it or not, his 1/4 performance from downtown actually increased his 3pt % to 19...
I hope the 2 matchups against Wall silence the comparisons. Let Fox grow into his own player..and I don't think anyone should be putting pressure on him to become a superstar either.
He was just never as good or polished as some people made him out to be. Lots of people kept with constant John Wall comparisons that made absolutely no sense to me. Just from a physical standpoint, Wall was 6'4 196lbs. Fox was 6'3 169lbs. Yet, people constantly kept with the "he's more athletic and quicker than Wall!" talks...despite 19yearold Wall being more athletic and physically dominant than Fox.
Believe it or not, his 1/4 performance from downtown actually increased his 3pt % to 19...
I hope the 2 matchups against Wall silence the comparisons. Let Fox grow into his own player..and I don't think anyone should be putting pressure on him to become a superstar either.
It's called coaching your player into a hold that holds him back versus playing to his strengths. I've said this since the beginning.. The more Fox gets used to the offense Joerger has in place, the more uncomfortable he'll look... It is unfavorable to shooters and guards. It's favorable only to inside scoring forwards and bigs.
Shooters can't get into rhythm in Dave's offense and ball handlers don't have any freedom or lanes to probe inside.
It Deaaron ever leaves. Watch him explode in a better system.
It's called coaching your player into a hold that holds him back versus playing to his strengths. I've said this since the beginning.. The more Fox gets used to the offense Joerger has in place, the more uncomfortable he'll look... It is unfavorable to shooters and guards. It's favorable only to inside scoring forwards and bigs.
Shooters can't get into rhythm in Dave's offense and ball handlers don't have any freedom or lanes to probe inside.
It Deaaron ever leaves. Watch him explode in a better system.
I don't like that stat...............but what the hell. how is Fox ranked dead last?ESPN released their real plus minus for all players.... guess who is dead last??
http://www.espn.com/nba/statistics/rpm/_/page/11/sort/RPM
I don't like that stat...............but what the hell. how is Fox ranked dead last?
Joerger did not sub out until 3 minutes left in the third. What's the deal with that? Kings were already down 20 with Hill, Randolph, and WCS in there.
I know he's trying to win a few games, but why stagnate the growth of the rooks and youngsters?
ESPN released their real plus minus for all players.... guess who is dead last??
http://www.espn.com/nba/statistics/rpm/_/page/11/sort/RPM
ESPN released their real plus minus for all players.... guess who is dead last??
http://www.espn.com/nba/statistics/rpm/_/page/11/sort/RPM
Spot on.Joerger's offense is just awful to watch. I didn't think that watching all these young prospects could ever be boring, but Joerger is trying his hardest to make it that way.
Where are the easy buckets? The wide open shots? I'm so over watching this high post crap and I'm just as over complaining about it myself. Our guards are constantly guarded all game. Our bigs are always guarded. It's just 1 on 1 over and over. Meanwhile, every single other team that plays against us gets dribble penetration which leads to easy buckets or wide open shots. They are coached to overplay the interior and allow wide open 3's all game. Joerger obviously favors his big men on offense so it's no surprise that he over compensates to stop points in the paint on the defensive end because he apparently thinks that it's the key to winning games.
The Kings have a lot of players, yet nearly none of them are really a net positive. That to me, is coaching. How is it possible that every player on the team looks like they suck? How do we have zero standout players? Why do we only have 1 player that breaks the 20pt mark every 3 games or so? Why does George Hill all the sudden suck? Why do we get WCS open lobs one game and then not a single easy bucket for the next 3? Why are we rarely running the pick and roll with Fox? Why are these guys so bad at setting and using screens?
We all know they are going to lose games but they shouldn't be down by 30 nearly every game.
Joerger's offense is just awful to watch. I didn't think that watching all these young prospects could ever be boring, but Joerger is trying his hardest to make it that way.
Where are the easy buckets? The wide open shots? I'm so over watching this high post crap and I'm just as over complaining about it myself. Our guards are constantly guarded all game. Our bigs are always guarded. It's just 1 on 1 over and over. Meanwhile, every single other team that plays against us gets dribble penetration which leads to easy buckets or wide open shots. They are coached to overplay the interior and allow wide open 3's all game. Joerger obviously favors his big men on offense so it's no surprise that he over compensates to stop points in the paint on the defensive end because he apparently thinks that it's the key to winning games.
The Kings have a lot of players, yet nearly none of them are really a net positive. That to me, is coaching. How is it possible that every player on the team looks like they suck? How do we have zero standout players? Why do we only have 1 player that breaks the 20pt mark every 3 games or so? Why does George Hill all the sudden suck? Why do we get WCS open lobs one game and then not a single easy bucket for the next 3? Why are we rarely running the pick and roll with Fox? Why are these guys so bad at setting and using screens?
We all know they are going to lose games but they shouldn't be down by 30 nearly every game.
And? That doesn't prove or negate my point.
3 minutes is EARLY for Joerger. Usually he waits till 2.
Look, I know a ton hate when everyone rags on the coach, I get it. But can everyone admit the 3 minute marker first substitution is very abnormal for a coach? In all my years watching basketball, I've never seen a coach wait past 5 on the regular, 6 minute is usually the average. I can't help but think it throws rhythms off, in the second half especially.
To be fair, George Hill just doesn't fit no matter what system we're running. He plays like a 3&D wing in a PG's body; I think his problem is that he can't be a starting PG unless he's the secondary ballhandler and playmaker.
But, while it's not as egregious as George Karl and Cousins, this offense is a problem. It benefits one person and one person alone, and that's Zbo. Coincidence that's he the focal point of the offense; I don't think so. There are two hallmarks to this offense: paint scoring/postups and high-post action. Zbo is the only one that can check both boxes, even as the rotting corpse he is now.
Only two players on the team have post-up ability, that's Zbo and Skal, and even then it doesn't benefit the latter the most (more on that in a second). Only Zbo really works as a passing big in the high post.
I'm usually one of the first to trash Koufos, but I'm seeing the ball get dumped into him a lot more this year. To Kosta Koufos, y'know, the guy with next to no offensive ability? That's not really fair because that's not his game in the slightest.
Drive-n-kick, PnR, transition. That's the type of offense we should be running. PnR with Fox and WCS, as well as PnR and more importantly PnP with Skal. We saw it once this game, but every time they run it it seems to work. This is where picking Hill over bringing back Lawson stings. Lawson is tailor-made for this type of offense that works so much better with our guys. Hill isn't. Neither is Zbo.
you just logiced the heck out of that stat - thanks it was confusing me but makes total sense.So the player who averages the most minutes on the team with the worst +/- in the league isn't supposed to be last?