Seems very healthy for a team environment.
We don't technically have to worry about not having the ability to match - we can use the MLE to match, and because TD has only two years in the league, no team can give him an offer sheet that exceeds the MLE.
Obviously the question is whether another team gives him an offer big enough we don't WANT to match, but that's a different story. Honestly I have no clue how big of an offer he'll get, and I have no clue how intent we're going to be to get him back considering right now he's probably the #5 guard on our depth chart behind Fox, Buddy, Haliburton, and Delon - and you can't say we won't end up drafting a guard!
We have "early Bird rights" which is 105% of the average salary or something like that. Which is more or less about the same as the MLE. However apparently we already have a small portion of our MLE tied up in Metu.Pardon my ignorance, but we will have to use the MLE to re-sign Holmes too or is that a different thing entirely?
Can use early bird rights.Pardon my ignorance, but we will have to use the MLE to re-sign Holmes too or is that a different thing entirely?
It was the most dejected, checked out team body language I've seen in person. They barely talked or looked at each other between whistles
Seems very healthy for a team environment.
Was at the game and Vlade was sitting with Vivek and Monte court side, hammin it up. Might the Vladfather be back in the fold?
Pardon my ignorance, but we will have to use the MLE to re-sign Holmes too or is that a different thing entirely?
I'm not "pro play-in" but the franchise is so I'd say we'll probably win at least 3 of those 4.For the pro play-in crowd the Spurs have lost 6 of 7 and have a brutal remaining 5 games. They could easily lose 4 of them. Could we pull off the unthinkable with wins against OKC, Memphis, Memphis and I assume a resting Utah team?
If this happens that would be a pretty epic collapse for a Pops lead squad.
I suppose some posters might be concerned we won’t have the cash to match? I know very little about the cap so not sure how that could play out
I wonder what kind of package it would take to get Poku (Bagley +)the guy should not be in tbe NBA currently but developing in Europe if he were playing for any serious team but the talent is absurd. At worst he's a 7 foot Kyle Anderson at best..............Along with Nikola Jovic (Not Jokic) they are the next great hopes after Jokic is past his prime for Serbia.
if only it were 7 of the last 7. theres a chance, but with that tie breaker, our chances are slim to none. but i guess miracles can happenFor the pro play-in crowd the Spurs have lost 6 of 7 and have a brutal remaining 5 games. They could easily lose 4 of them. Could we pull off the unthinkable with wins against OKC, Memphis, Memphis and I assume a resting Utah team?
If this happens that would be a pretty epic collapse for a Pops lead squad.
I don’t think OkC would trade Poku unless it was part of a package deal for a legit plus player. I really like his talent and think he will be fun to watch develop. OkC has the luxury of being patient with him too so it’s an ideal situation.
We have "early Bird rights" which is 105% of the average salary or something like that. Which is more or less about the same as the MLE. However apparently we already have a small portion of our MLE tied up in Metu.
I think you posted that number incidentally in a past post, perhaps I misread.We may have a small portion of this year's MLE tied up in Metu, but next year's (i.e. summer 2021's) MLE is certainly not involved. When a team uses an exception to sign a player to a multi-year contract, subsequent years become regular team salary and do not require additional exceptions.
It'll all be worth it when they get to draft Davion Mitchell with the sixth overall pick!
Seems very healthy for a team environment.
Seems very healthy for a team environment.
Seems very healthy for a team environment.
Most ridiculous thing about the current NBA lottery system is that it just incentivizes more org's to surrender completely rather than uphold the integrity and spirit of competition. It does the exact opposite of what it was intended to do. So you end up with nonsense like OKC's team.
Not only that, but instead of one or two boneheaded teams intentionally losing for the top pick, now you've got at handful vying for the top 3 lottery odds.
The NBA was much better off with the initial lottery system where ALL non-playoff teams held the same odds.
I know the downside to that was Orlando ending up with #1 in 1993 after barely missing the postseason at 41-41.
But that's still a better situation than what they have going on now. Sure, late in the season you might have a team or two deciding that missing out on #7 or #8 to get in the lottery is better than facing one of the top 2 seeds but that would still be better than season long or 2nd half tanking by numerous teams.
The system they've developed over the past 25 years is just ridiculously stupid.
One slight modification they could make to this is the worst 12 teams have the same odds with the 13th and 14 teams having slightly worse odds. That might prevent an 8th seed from “tanking” to get to 12th.
I think you posted that number incidentally in a past post, perhaps I misread.
Most ridiculous thing about the current NBA lottery system is that it just incentivizes more org's to surrender completely rather than uphold the integrity and spirit of competition. It does the exact opposite of what it was intended to do. So you end up with nonsense like OKC's team.
Not only that, but instead of one or two boneheaded teams intentionally losing for the top pick, now you've got at handful vying for the top 3 lottery odds.
The NBA was much better off with the initial lottery system where ALL non-playoff teams held the same odds.
I know the downside to that was Orlando ending up with #1 in 1993 after barely missing the postseason at 41-41.
But that's still a better situation than what they have going on now. Sure, late in the season you might have a team or two deciding that missing out on #7 or #8 to get in the lottery is better than facing one of the top 2 seeds but that would still be better than season long or 2nd half tanking by numerous teams.
The system they've developed over the past 25 years is just ridiculously stupid.
if only it were 7 of the last 7. theres a chance, but with that tie breaker, our chances are slim to none. but i guess miracles can happen
Seems very healthy for a team environment.
That pop and Buford are worse than McNair at tanking?the fact it wasn’t 7 for 7 should tell us something more than beating a G League team.
really if you are that concerned you need to move away from the lottery and have teams not in the play-offs ranked by the commissioner for draft order. In that case, the kings would well be in the top 5. Only Houston, Detroit, Cleveland are probably worse.
I’m assuming they keep the play-in, or some close equivalent, and was thinking it would make sense to just order the play in teams by record for picks 11-14, and have the ten worst teams all with equal odds for picks 1-10.
The current system is well intended, but for every team who falls on bad fortune, there seems to be more teams who have intentionally chosen not to compete this season.
You think Minnesota, Orlando and OkC are better than the Kings?
I’m totally onboard with giving all the non Playoff team or most of them equal odds. Fans could go back to rooting for their team again. I find it pretty draining to watch games hoping for a loss.