You continue to act like I'm the only one who sees these things. Not coaching defense, not putting lineups on the floor which show any commitment to defense, constant small ball or three guard lineups which not only happened here, but in GS as well, and stats which back up our points allowed consistently rising. Where's your evidence he ever coached defense or even thinks it's a priority?
You are well aware I've pointed out Smart is a good teacher. You're also well aware I've said he's good at forming relationships and what he's done with Cousins is good to see. But because I don't like his lineups and substitutions which others also see, which also happened last year in GS, in your mind everything positive I've said about Smart can't be acknowledged by you? Because he's a good teacher and has been great for Cousins, which I've pointed out before, I shouldn't comment on his substitution patterns or lack of defense, and pretend it isn't a huge concern?
You're free to only look at positives and act like the negatives don't exist. You're also welcome to ignore the history here, and that this happened last year at another organization as well. I do however find it a little ridiculous you don't want me pointing out faulty sub patterns and lack of defense, along with too much small ball because of his positives, which I've also pointed out previously and agree with. Because he has positives I can't point out or talk about negatives? Because he's better than Westy, we can't criticize the man?
He learned under D Nelson. These same criticisms I'm pointing out followed Nelson around his entire career. It's no wonder in two stops Smart is increasingly showing the same positives and negatives Nelson largely showed. But I shouldn't bring it up because you don't like hearing it? Acknowledging it? Prefer to ignore it?