Probably so that they wouldn't look worse than they were? The shot clock that wasn't was a home team error and probably shouldn't have even been reviewed since they actually let it play, and the out of bounds call was them upholding their own call. I'd hardly say they made up for re-writing the foul rules. They said it was contact and justified it as ok because it was after the release. I've been watching this game 40 years. Was there a recent rule change before tonight I was unaware of? Harden's whole career used to be selling contact after his release.
That’s the thing, we have decades of viewing experience over thousands and thousands of games knowing how these things are overwhelmingly called/ruled.
Anyone that’s watched this ”entertainment” league long enough should be able to easily recognize and understand that it’s not even so much the technicality or spirit of the rules but rather which players were involved in the play. That’s what factors in the most. Because rules are applied subjectively.
Think back to Kobe Bryant delivering a near knockout blow forearm to Mike Bibby’s face causing it to instantly bleed yet Bibby being called for a foul. If the roles were reversed in the same situation and given circumstances, Bibby gets whistled for the offensive foul.
The act itself would have been no different. Just the outcome based upon the players identity and team. Replay offsets that at times, but we still often see replay inexplicably fail to correct an obvious call. I‘ve seen some pretty egregious replay calls just this season involving teams other than the KINGS.
When the games mean the most, the NBA can and still does orchestrate them as they see fit. So does the NFL. So does NCAA. That’s the downside of such a subjective sport (wrt officiating).
I’ll happily backtrack if/when small market and/or non-marquee players and franchises are largely the ones benefitting from slanted officiating. You cannot sell me on the notion that it’s all a coincidence that the league biggest of stars and most marquee franchises are the ones benefiting seemingly 95% of the time.
When have the Lakers ever lost a big playoff series in the same way the KINGS did in 2002? Especially so to a franchise not in the same rarefied air as they are?
How often do the Lakers and Celtics have multiple wins stolen from them in the same fashion that the KINGS have the past 5 days?
Rhetorical questions.