macadocious
Starter
Bagley isn't going to make this team a winner that's why I'd have him on the trade block.
That’s some hard hitting analysis
Bagley isn't going to make this team a winner that's why I'd have him on the trade block.
Wizards aren't looking to trade Otto Porter Jr., but Kings rumor is an interesting one originally appeared on nbcsportswashington.comThough the timing was coincidental, Otto Porter Jr.'s absence from Friday night's game against the Sixers had nothing
Continue reading...
That’s some hard hitting analysis
It's not meant to be. It's an opinion.
Seeing as how the last time the team was a winner was in 1951, that's not exactly a bold statement. You can propose any ludicrous thing you want, with no supporting arguments, and then say 'See I was right, they didn't win' later on. If you want anyone on this site to take you seriously, you need to give plausible reasons. In what you've said on this thread, there aren't any.Bagley isn't going to make this team a winner that's why I'd have him on the trade block.
Here is the thing. I don't think Washington moves Porter, just to get under the Luxury Tax this year. They would need to get further down under the cap to make a Porter trade worth while, because they would still need to resign Kelly Oubre.
The Kings give up nothing of real value to their long term plan. Mahinmi becomes a huge ender we can use next year at the trade deadline too.
Would I prefer not to take Mahinmi in a Porter trade? Absolutley. I just don't think Washington moves Porter just to avoid the Luxury Tax this season. They would still be in salary cap hell next year if they don't move Mahinmi contract too.
It's not meant to be. It's an opinion.
No it doesn't.Porter going to Houston makes sense.
Porter going to Houston makes sense. Houston will trade Gordon and someone else to make salaries match. Houston gets a bonafide 3 and their are in the hunt again.
No it doesn't.
It makes sense for Houston but no sense for Washington. Why would they want another shooting guard when they have a max contract guard in Beal? Gordon is not going to jumpstart their season. What they need is cap relief and help in the front court. If they’re going to blow up this team, they will more likely want some young potential in the front court along with cap relief and not just another Mid level shooting guardPorter going to Houston makes sense. Houston will trade Gordon and someone else to make salaries match. Houston gets a bonafide 3 and their are in the hunt again.
It doesn't even really make sense for Houston since there is almost no way they could assume that salary. They'd still have to find another 12-14 million to make things match, which either means giving up Capella or throwing in more junk that makes the deal even worse for Washington.It makes sense for Houston but no sense for Washington. Why would they want another shooting guard when they have a max contract guard in Beal? Gordon is not going to jumpstart their season. What they need is cap relief and help in the front court. If they’re going to blow up this team, they will more likely want some young potential in the front court along with cap relief and not just another Mid level shooting guard
That’s some hard hitting analysis
Bagley isn't going to make this team a winner that's why I'd have him on the trade block.
That said, nobody else can save them more than about $5.8M in any deal for Porter alone whatsoever, so if they want to get under the tax this year, their options are 1) Trade with us and act fast, 2) Trade Porter and make several other ancillary trades, 3) Trade Porter and start waiving players (Mahinmi, Rivers), or 4) Tough luck.
And if it takes eating Mahinmi's contract, so be it.
...and if the Kings had to eat Mahinmi's salary to get it done, so be it.
I don't know how many losses need to pile up and how poisonous that locker room needs to get before Grunfeld does what is necessary, but your guess is as good as mine.
Why does everyone assume Washington is blowing it up? Media BS. Wall/Beal are probably not going anywhere. Washington has been playing much better lately. Only 1.5 out of 8. What if Washington is looking for scoring and defending? Not saying the deal will happen.
Hey @Capt. Factorial maybe my understanding of tax is off, but I thought as long as you got the salary off your books before the end of the year you were out of the tax. Much like the meeting the salary floor only needs to happen by the end of the season.
Please correct me if I am wrong on this.
When determining the amount of tax a team owes, the league uses its team salary (see question number 13) on the date of its last regular season game (i.e., if a player is traded away before the end of the season, then none of his salary is taxed), with the following adjustments:
Cap holds and exceptions are ignored.
Any "unlikely bonuses" (see question number 74) that were actually earned are added to the team salary.
Any "likely bonuses" (see question number 74) that were not earned are subtracted from the team salary.
Any trade bonuses (see question number 99) for players received in trade after the last regular season game are added to the team salary. This amount may be pro-rated -- see question number 100 for details.
Any amounts from settlements of grievances are added to the team salary.
For players who signed as free agents (i.e., not draft picks) under the current CBA, and make less than the two-year minimum salary, the minimum salary for a two-year veteran is used in place of their actual salary.2
For minimum salary players whose salary is partially paid by the league (see question number 22) only the amount paid by the team (the two-year minimum salary) is taxed.
Hey @Capt. Factorial maybe my understanding of tax is off, but I thought as long as you got the salary off your books before the end of the year you were out of the tax. Much like the meeting the salary floor only needs to happen by the end of the season.
Please correct me if I am wrong on this.
Sorry for the info dump. Looks like the trade bones at 15% is on the prorated remaining guaranteed salary. Option years are not included. So whenever he is traded if its this year it would be the remaining of this year contract and next years. His PO for the following year is not included.
So if this year is half way over he'd be looking at about a $6MM trade kicker (15% of 40ish Million)
Sounds like a prorated amount of the trade bonus is added to their cap this year? Seems like it's a bit more difficult to gauge the actual tax savings based on that information.
Yogi + a couple 2nd rounders. Get it doneIf we can't acquire Otto Porter then GO GET TREVOR ARIZA!!!!! 1 year deal= NO BRAINER.
I really can't gauge the veracity of this report, but if it's true that the Wizards locker room is not exactly kind to Otto, he'd likely be in a much better place here.
I haven't been 100% convinced the Wizards are selling on Porter (I am convinced that the Wizards are in a bad situation with respect to the salary cap, don't get me wrong, I'm just not convinced they want to sell yet) but reports like this would probably up the probability, particularly if it is Wall who is one of the guilty parties here. Wall is almost 100% untradeable due to his contract. But if Otto gets bullied into a second-tier player, they just can't justify sitting on that contract - especially as if this report is true, things will likely only get worse, not better, and the Wiz would be wise to trade Porter now before his value REALLY tanks.
I've been all in favor of trying to get Porter without giving up any long-term assets. He would be a sensible acquisition because we have a Porter-shaped hole in our roster and history says we're unlikely to fill it this offseason with a player even near his caliber in free agency. Is he overpaid? Maybe a bit, but that's the cost of business when you aren't an attractive free agent destination. This is exactly the sort of move that we ought to make with the cap space we have saved up. And if it takes eating Mahinmi's contract, so be it.
If there's a problem at all, it's that we would have to send out at least $30.94M to take in both Porter and Mahinmi. Interestingly, the package ZBo+McLemore+Shumpert+JJ is $30.97M. All of these are expiring except for JJ, who is still cheap and would step right into their rotation. I'm pretty happy with what we are getting from Shump these days, but I'm telling you, I pull the trigger on that deal today. I just don't know if the Wizards are really ready to go there. And if they are, they kind of have to jump *now*, because with the way salaries pro-rate, we are probably within a few days either way of this deal being able to get them under the tax (I'm not 100% sure of the period over which the salaries would be pro-rated), otherwise they'd have to either make another move or just accept being a bit over the tax this year to hopefully start resetting next year.
I think things get harder if we don't try to eat Mahinmi. It's a better salary position for us, but I think that part of the reason the Wizards might (*might*) be tempted to drop Porter for a small return would be to get out from under the salary burdens they've committed themselves to, and that includes Mahinmi's $31M+ over this season and the next. ZBo+McLemore for Porter straight up works, but that's basically highway robbery and the Wiz can almost certainly get a better deal than that, given that it doesn't get them under the tax. It would only save them $8.85M this year (pro-rated to about $6.6M, and they are $7.8M over the tax), so they'd probably be looking for actual talent back. There's been discussion of that actual talent being Willie instead of Ben. ZBo+Willie straight up would work and would save the Wiz another several hundred thousand, though still not enough to get under the tax. ZBo + JJ would get them low enough to get under the tax by standing pat elsewhere, but even then, that deal has to be made in a very short amount of time (based on pro-rating the salaries I estimate that deal would have to get done by about December 10th, but again I'm not sure on the actual pro-rate period).
That said, nobody else can save them more than about $5.8M in any deal for Porter alone whatsoever, so if they want to get under the tax this year, their options are 1) Trade with us and act fast, 2) Trade Porter and make several other ancillary trades, 3) Trade Porter and start waiving players (Mahinmi, Rivers), or 4) Tough luck.
I really can't gauge the veracity of this report, but if it's true that the Wizards locker room is not exactly kind to Otto, he'd likely be in a much better place here.
I haven't been 100% convinced the Wizards are selling on Porter (I am convinced that the Wizards are in a bad situation with respect to the salary cap, don't get me wrong, I'm just not convinced they want to sell yet) but reports like this would probably up the probability, particularly if it is Wall who is one of the guilty parties here. Wall is almost 100% untradeable due to his contract. But if Otto gets bullied into a second-tier player, they just can't justify sitting on that contract - especially as if this report is true, things will likely only get worse, not better, and the Wiz would be wise to trade Porter now before his value REALLY tanks.
I've been all in favor of trying to get Porter without giving up any long-term assets. He would be a sensible acquisition because we have a Porter-shaped hole in our roster and history says we're unlikely to fill it this offseason with a player even near his caliber in free agency. Is he overpaid? Maybe a bit, but that's the cost of business when you aren't an attractive free agent destination. This is exactly the sort of move that we ought to make with the cap space we have saved up. And if it takes eating Mahinmi's contract, so be it.
If there's a problem at all, it's that we would have to send out at least $30.94M to take in both Porter and Mahinmi. Interestingly, the package ZBo+McLemore+Shumpert+JJ is $30.97M. All of these are expiring except for JJ, who is still cheap and would step right into their rotation. I'm pretty happy with what we are getting from Shump these days, but I'm telling you, I pull the trigger on that deal today. I just don't know if the Wizards are really ready to go there. And if they are, they kind of have to jump *now*, because with the way salaries pro-rate, we are probably within a few days either way of this deal being able to get them under the tax (I'm not 100% sure of the period over which the salaries would be pro-rated), otherwise they'd have to either make another move or just accept being a bit over the tax this year to hopefully start resetting next year.
I think things get harder if we don't try to eat Mahinmi. It's a better salary position for us, but I think that part of the reason the Wizards might (*might*) be tempted to drop Porter for a small return would be to get out from under the salary burdens they've committed themselves to, and that includes Mahinmi's $31M+ over this season and the next. ZBo+McLemore for Porter straight up works, but that's basically highway robbery and the Wiz can almost certainly get a better deal than that, given that it doesn't get them under the tax. It would only save them $8.85M this year (pro-rated to about $6.6M, and they are $7.8M over the tax), so they'd probably be looking for actual talent back. There's been discussion of that actual talent being Willie instead of Ben. ZBo+Willie straight up would work and would save the Wiz another several hundred thousand, though still not enough to get under the tax. ZBo + JJ would get them low enough to get under the tax by standing pat elsewhere, but even then, that deal has to be made in a very short amount of time (based on pro-rating the salaries I estimate that deal would have to get done by about December 10th, but again I'm not sure on the actual pro-rate period).
That said, nobody else can save them more than about $5.8M in any deal for Porter alone whatsoever, so if they want to get under the tax this year, their options are 1) Trade with us and act fast, 2) Trade Porter and make several other ancillary trades, 3) Trade Porter and start waiving players (Mahinmi, Rivers), or 4) Tough luck.