From the link. Here's what NBA 2K has:

And here are the others:From the link. Here's what NBA 2K has:
![]()
Definitely. It loses the throwback appeal if it's used that regularly. It becomes more of an alternate. And extra confusing when the actual alternate looked almost exactly the same but in black.
![]()
With the new alternate and the new stretch uniform the baby blues would be more of a departure, especially if used more sparingly.
Agreed on the camo and I would still want the lion/ball logo at the bottom of the shorts, but just based on the mockups I like the granite mockup a lot more.
I'm bumping this thread because new details on the uniforms came out today. Sounds like they came from NBA 2K leaks, which are usually spot on. I like them!
What do you all think?
http://news.sportslogos.net/2016/06/14/2016-17-sacramento-kings-jerseys-leaked/
![]()
![]()
![]()
The below image of the black uniform is an estimated guess, based off of elements on our draft hat, which you can find in the article:![]()
They're so plain... I'm very disappointed with them.![]()
I like classic and plain but those don't do it for me. Colors are dull without much contrast.
The league is starting the "Jersey Ad" program in the 2017-18 season. So anyone who's interested basically has 1 year to buy the jerseys or be stuck walking around advertising for some company. Not to mention, it just ruins the look of the jersey. Apparently the Sixers got $5 million a year from StubHub for 3 years so it's real money and I don't see the league cancelling it after the 3 year trial period ends. Let's just hope it doesn't turn into like soccer jerseys where the main logo is the main sponsor's.
Here is the Sixers version with the StubHub logo.
![]()
My understanding is that the jerseys for sale to fans won't have the advertiser's logos on them.
That would be good. Was this announced by the NBA?