I think our palette is just going to be Purple, Granite, Black, and White, unfortunately. I was also hoping for some baby blue to make it.Just looking at the sneak peak of the the "SAC" alternate shows the difference between flat renderings and the real thing.
Still, I would hope there's a little more pop to the actual uniforms than what's being shown here. I was hoping for more of an Atlanta Hawks rebrand with the uniforms. Something a little different. I was also hoping baby blue would make an appearance as an accent color they way Atlanta used their old green color. After all, Chris Granger did say that the uniforms would be using "every color in our palette".
I suppose I'll wait to see the real thing before commenting further
Just looking at the sneak peak of the the "SAC" alternate shows the difference between flat renderings and the real thing.
Still, I would hope there's a little more pop to the actual uniforms than what's being shown here. I was hoping for more of an Atlanta Hawks rebrand with the uniforms. Something a little different. I was also hoping baby blue would make an appearance as an accent color they way Atlanta used their old green color. After all, Chris Granger did say that the uniforms would be using "every color in our palette".
I suppose I'll wait to see the real thing before commenting further
You do realize that baby blue was a mistake, and one of the wussiest colors alive, don't you?
Save the baby blue for the jumpers in the team store.
You do realize that baby blue was a mistake, and one of the wussiest colors alive, don't you?
Save the baby blue for the jumpers in the team store.
Yeahhh.... not really feeling those. Not mad but yeahhhhh.So, new details emerged regarding our uniform sets. These are just mockups, but I generally trust these guys regarding their inside sources: http://news.sportslogos.net/2016/04/27/new-details-on-sacramento-kings-uniforms-for-2016-17/
After such a home run with the logos, i'm a bit underwhelmed. These look far too similar to the '03 - '08 uniform sets.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
I think our palette is just going to be Purple, Granite, Black, and White, unfortunately. I was also hoping for some baby blue to make it.
You're right though, about the sneak peak of the SAC alternate and the flat rendering. Hopefully the real uniforms pop a little more than those concepts.
You do realize that baby blue was a mistake, and one of the wussiest colors alive, don't you?
Save the baby blue for the jumpers in the team store.
There are no wussy colors as long as I'm the one wearing them.
I actually like the baby blue as a throwback, but I think we used it way too often this year. That kind of thing should be like a three-times-a-year thing, not every Friday.
I really liked this granite mockup from some random person (https://www.instagram.com/p/BEriDIklj8O/). I could do without the Camo fringe on the sleeves - purple would be great there - but it doesn't really look like we've got a granite uniform coming through. Too bad.
So, new details emerged regarding our uniform sets. These are just mockups, but I generally trust these guys regarding their inside sources: http://news.sportslogos.net/2016/04/27/new-details-on-sacramento-kings-uniforms-for-2016-17/
After such a home run with the logos, i'm a bit underwhelmed. These look far too similar to the '03 - '08 uniform sets.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
That has always just irked me. What the heck is wrong with an upper-case "N" once in a while???Really don't like this logo. Especially the lower case 'n' and then an uppercase 'G' in Kings.
That has always just irked me. What the heck is wrong with an upper-case "N" once in a while???
Not at all impressed. The numeric font is particularly annoying. Looks like 1b more than 16.
And the "Sac" on the front of the away jerseys? Look up the definition, folks. Among other things, a "sac" is "the distended membrane surrounding a hernia, cyst, or tumor." But that's just me grumping like I did when they thought tying to the Kings to King Midas was a good idea.![]()
I've always referred to Sacramento as Sac. I'm sure some immature fans out there will poke fun at it and snicker together, but anybody from the area will know you are talking about Sacramento.Not at all impressed. The numeric font is particularly annoying. Looks like 1b more than 16.
And the "Sac" on the front of the away jerseys? Look up the definition, folks. Among other things, a "sac" is "the distended membrane surrounding a hernia, cyst, or tumor." But that's just me grumping like I did when they thought tying to the Kings to King Midas was a good idea.![]()
I've always referred to Sacramento as Sac. I'm sure some immature fans out there will poke fun at it and snicker together, but anybody from the area will know you are talking about Sacramento.
I understand the predicament... "Sacramento" is a long word and in order to fit it, you need to either squish the letters together (like our old uniforms) or you need to make the font tiny (like New Orleans unis), and I'd argue that neither look very good. Using "SAC" accomplishes representing your city while using big, bold letters. If we can get past looking at the definition of a "sac" and look at this in context, IMO it makes a lot of sense and is a good call.
I've always referred to Sacramento as Sac. I'm sure some immature fans out there will poke fun at it and snicker together, but anybody from the area will know you are talking about Sacramento.
I understand the predicament... "Sacramento" is a long word and in order to fit it, you need to either squish the letters together (like our old uniforms) or you need to make the font tiny (like New Orleans unis), and I'd argue that neither look very good. Using "SAC" accomplishes representing your city while using big, bold letters. If we can get past looking at the definition of a "sac" and look at this in context, IMO it makes a lot of sense and is a good call.
I've always referred to Sacramento as Sac. I'm sure some immature fans out there will poke fun at it and snicker together, but anybody from the area will know you are talking about Sacramento.
I understand the predicament... "Sacramento" is a long word and in order to fit it, you need to either squish the letters together (like our old uniforms) or you need to make the font tiny (like New Orleans unis), and I'd argue that neither look very good. Using "SAC" accomplishes representing your city while using big, bold letters. If we can get past looking at the definition of a "sac" and look at this in context, IMO it makes a lot of sense and is a good call.
Sacramento looks awkward squeezed onto a jersey so I'm favor of shortening it somehow. The Blazers have cool Rip City jerseys. The Hornets tried to get in on the action with Buzz City this year and Detroit has got their Motor City alternates. Admittedly I haven't lived in Sacramento since 2001, but I've never heard anyone refer to the city as "Sac" other than NBA boxscores. Everyone down here calls it Sactown. Why not go with Sactown? That would look cool on a jersey wouldn't it?
i'm actually really fond of this idea for an alternate jersey of some kind.
I think the obvious solution is to tear down the crushed tin can they keep trying to convince me is "beautiful", and move the team to GALT.
I think the obvious solution is to tear down the crushed tin can they keep trying to convince me is "beautiful", and move the team to GALT.
I've always referred to Sacramento as Sac. I'm sure some immature fans out there will poke fun at it and snicker together, but anybody from the area will know you are talking about Sacramento.
I understand the predicament... "Sacramento" is a long word and in order to fit it, you need to either squish the letters together (like our old uniforms) or you need to make the font tiny (like New Orleans unis), and I'd argue that neither look very good. Using "SAC" accomplishes representing your city while using big, bold letters. If we can get past looking at the definition of a "sac" and look at this in context, IMO it makes a lot of sense and is a good call.