Eh, it is his name. No different than calling Demarcus Cousins, Cousins...or Cuz.It must suck to have a name that nobody can be bothered to get right.
Eh, it is his name. No different than calling Demarcus Cousins, Cousins...or Cuz.It must suck to have a name that nobody can be bothered to get right.
I hope the details of the trade comes out soon, a lot of Q marks about it.Do the pick swaps expire at some point? Thought it was by 2018 right?
Do the pick swaps expire at some point? Thought it was by 2018 right?
That article is wrong. It has been pointed out several times in the comments (including first by yours truly - such a surprise!). The bottom line is that no matter how you create a trade exception, it counts against the cap. You have to renounce it to use the cap space that it covers. You can have the trade exception, or you can have the cap space to sign free agents, but you can't have both.
Capt., I definitely look for your posts as clarification, but I am having a hard time understanding this. If there was no mention of a trade and we just signed Rondo and Cauley-Stein, we would be over the cap at that point. We then trade our contracts to Philly into their space which creates the exception I thought. I lean towards your understanding in this dept, but the articles understanding was mine as well.That article is wrong. It has been pointed out several times in the comments (including first by yours truly - such a surprise!). The bottom line is that no matter how you create a trade exception, it counts against the cap. You have to renounce it to use the cap space that it covers. You can have the trade exception, or you can have the cap space to sign free agents, but you can't have both.
No, actually, it's not like that at all. His name is Luc Mbah a Moute; you called him Luc Mbah. That'd be more like calling Cousins, DeMarcus Co.Eh, it is his name. No different than calling Demarcus Cousins, Cousins...or Cuz.
Capt., I definitely look for your posts as clarification, but I am having a hard time understanding this. If there was no mention of a trade and we just signed Rondo and Cauley-Stein, we would be over the cap at that point. We then trade our contracts to Philly into their space which creates the exception I thought. I lean towards your understanding in this dept, but the articles understanding was mine as well.
That's not competely accurate- it's more like calling David Robert Joseph Beckham, David Robert- which is confusing and I have no idea why someone needs two middle names...No, actually, it's not like that at all. You called him Luc Mbah. That'd be more like calling Cousins, DeMarcus Co.
The swap picks are for 2016 and 2017.
My understanding is the swaps is only the next 2 drafts.
i was backpacking through the ansel adams wilderness in inyo national forest all last week with my wife and our dog, so i missed the majority of the free agency action across the nba. but now i'm caught up on current events, and you all had yourselves quite a time at kf.com without me!
i think the marco belinelli signing was smart and shrewd; he will undoubtedly help the kings' outside shooting problems, and he's a high-IQ player who's winning experience under gregg popovich can be nothing but an asset. and i absolutely love the kosta koufos signing. he was a guy i had hoped the kings were targeting, and i'm very pleased they were able to land him. as long as demarcus cousins sticks around, he, WCS, and koufos will be an extremely formidable frontline rotation across the next few seasons. if WCS becomes the player i hope he'll become, it could easily be the strongest defensive frontline rotation in the west...
then there's the rajon rondo signing. i knew it was a possibility that he would sign here (even a likelihood, given rudy gay's friendship with rondo), though i'm not exactly the biggest fan of the move. i am glad that both camps were determined to ink a one-year deal, though. rondo's got a "make good" season coming up, and he's certainly going to want to prove that injuries and an unfortunate stint in dallas don't represent the end of his effectiveness. and if it doesn't work out for the kings, they can easily cut him loose next offseason. i'm just not sure how it does work out for the kings. rondo will have to temper his ego considerably (perhaps a difficult task when playing for george karl/playing with demarcus cousins), he'll have to get real comfortable feeding big cuz in the post and finding the kings' shooters in space, and he'll have to reacquire some of his drive on the defensive end. all told, i'm not convinced that he's any kind of "upgrade" over darren collison, though i am happy that the kings now have a legitimate PG rotation infused with veteran talent...
elsewhere, i found the thompson/landry/stauskas trade rather perplexing at first, though i appreciate the urgency it communicates. i don't really have a problem with the kings unloading minimal contributors, even the developing stauskas, but i am made a bit nervous by the future draft picks involved. it's certainly a ballsy move that emphasizes the need for the team to improve immediately and make a run at the playoffs. and lastly, i wasn't surprised that wes matthews turned down the kings' offer, but it was encouraging to me that vlade had clearly targeted the right kinda player for this team. i like that he played the role of vladfather, making matthews an offer that he wouldn't have been able to refuse under more stable circumstances for this franchise; making such an offer was an acknowledgment that this franchise's reputation is in a broken state, but that vlade's going to try to do everything in his power to repair it...
Maybe someone can set me straight if I'm confused.... but don't we still have a 5.8 mil trade exception from the Jason Terry trade and about 2 mil from Ramon Sessions that are going to expire in a few months which means we can take on small salary dumps from other teams even though we are at the cap limit? 5.8 Mil could pick us up a solid roll player that a team might be looking to drop for more room....
I think you are faking it.That could happen, yes. But the problem is that...well, let me spitball some numbers just to make it concrete. Let's even use fake numbers so we don't get caught up in the actual numbers, which are unimportant. So the fake salary cap is $100M. We have fake $80M in salaries, including JT, etc. We sign fake Rondo to an $18M contract, so our salaries are at $98M. Then we sign fake WCS to a $5M contract. Our salaries are at $103M, but we can use the rookie exception to sign WCS. Now we trade fake JT/Nik/Landry to the Sixers for the second round picks taking no salary back - they make fake $25M combined, so our salary drops to $78M and we get a trade exception for $25M. (Technically I think this trade exception would be three smaller ones in the size of the three contracts we sent...but that's not material.)
Now - we have $78M in salaries and $25M in trade exception(s). That's $103M against the cap, because the trade exception counts against the cap. So we can't sign any free agents. But we want to sign fake Belinelli to $9M and fake Koufos to $13M. If we renounce the trade exception(s), we have enough cap space to do this. But, poof!, the trade exception(s) are gone when we renounce them to sign Beli/Koufos.
So can we create the trade exception? Sure. Can we sign players while keeping the trade exception? No. I hope the above made sense.
That's not competely accurate- it's more like calling David Robert Joseph Beckham, David Robert- which is confusing and I have no idea why someone needs two middle names...
That could happen, yes. But the problem is that...well, let me spitball some numbers just to make it concrete. Let's even use fake numbers so we don't get caught up in the actual numbers, which are unimportant. So the fake salary cap is $100M. We have fake $80M in salaries, including JT, etc. We sign fake Rondo to an $18M contract, so our salaries are at $98M. Then we sign fake WCS to a $5M contract. Our salaries are at $103M, but we can use the rookie exception to sign WCS. Now we trade fake JT/Nik/Landry to the Sixers for the second round picks taking no salary back - they make fake $25M combined, so our salary drops to $78M and we get a trade exception for $25M. (Technically I think this trade exception would be three smaller ones in the size of the three contracts we sent...but that's not material.)
Now - we have $78M in salaries and $25M in trade exception(s). That's $103M against the cap, because the trade exception counts against the cap. So we can't sign any free agents. But we want to sign fake Belinelli to $9M and fake Koufos to $13M. If we renounce the trade exception(s), we have enough cap space to do this. But, poof!, the trade exception(s) are gone when we renounce them to sign Beli/Koufos.
So can we create the trade exception? Sure. Can we sign players while keeping the trade exception? No. I hope the above made sense.
then there's the rajon rondo signing. i'm just not sure how it does work out for the kings. rondo will have to temper his ego considerably (perhaps a difficult task when playing for george karl/playing with demarcus cousins), he'll have to get real comfortable feeding big cuz in the post and finding the kings' shooters in space, and he'll have to reacquire some of his drive on the defensive end.
Exactly. The back of his jersey doesn't say "Moute," it says "Mbah a Moute."I believe his full surname is in fact "Mbah a Moute". Calling him "Luc Mbah" would be like using "Jill St." to refer to actress Jill St. John.
IPDRCOWOTO.No, actually, it's not like that at all. His name is Luc Mbah a Moute; you called him Luc Mbah. That'd be more like calling Cousins, DeMarcus Co.
I was referring to the smaller ones from last year. Depending on how close we are to the cap the trade exception could be used instead of cap space to get a player in a salary dump for example perry jones from okc.That could happen, yes. But the problem is that...well, let me spitball some numbers just to make it concrete. Let's even use fake numbers so we don't get caught up in the actual numbers, which are unimportant. So the fake salary cap is $100M. We have fake $80M in salaries, including JT, etc. We sign fake Rondo to an $18M contract, so our salaries are at $98M. Then we sign fake WCS to a $5M contract. Our salaries are at $103M, but we can use the rookie exception to sign WCS. Now we trade fake JT/Nik/Landry to the Sixers for the second round picks taking no salary back - they make fake $25M combined, so our salary drops to $78M and we get a trade exception for $25M. (Technically I think this trade exception would be three smaller ones in the size of the three contracts we sent...but that's not material.)
Now - we have $78M in salaries and $25M in trade exception(s). That's $103M against the cap, because the trade exception counts against the cap. So we can't sign any free agents. But we want to sign fake Belinelli to $9M and fake Koufos to $13M. If we renounce the trade exception(s), we have enough cap space to do this. But, poof!, the trade exception(s) are gone when we renounce them to sign Beli/Koufos.
So can we create the trade exception? Sure. Can we sign players while keeping the trade exception? No. I hope the above made sense.
No. His name is Luc Richard Mbah a Moute. Irony lol. Next time you call Cousins, Cousins I will nitpick! I don't know which one is his middle name or last name. Luc Richard could be his entire first name.No, actually, it's not like that at all. His name is Luc Mbah a Moute; you called him Luc Mbah. That'd be more like calling Cousins, DeMarcus Co.
I am fully aware of that- the thing is if we don't make the playoffs those swaps are valuable to the 76ers because they buy them more ping-balls even if we are better than them...
I was referring to the smaller ones from last year. Depending on how close we are to the cap the trade exception could be used instead of cap space to get a player in a salary dump for example perry jones from okc.
They decide after final positions are determinedAre you suggesting that the 76ers get the King's ping-pong balls even if they are worse than the Kings? That would be surprising. I assume the 76ers would have to decide whether they are swapping positions before the draft and each team would get ping-pong balls equivalent to their position.
Have you read something different?
Are you suggesting that the 76ers get the King's ping-pong balls even if they are worse than the Kings? That would be surprising. I assume the 76ers would have to decide whether they are swapping positions before the draft and each team would get ping-pong balls equivalent to their position.
Have you read something different?
Are you suggesting that the 76ers get the King's ping-pong balls even if they are worse than the Kings? That would be surprising. I assume the 76ers would have to decide whether they are swapping positions before the draft and each team would get ping-pong balls equivalent to their position.
Have you read something different?
Makes total sense. Thanks! Sometimes you just have to hear something a different way for it to click.That could happen, yes. But the problem is that...well, let me spitball some numbers just to make it concrete. Let's even use fake numbers so we don't get caught up in the actual numbers, which are unimportant. So the fake salary cap is $100M. We have fake $80M in salaries, including JT, etc. We sign fake Rondo to an $18M contract, so our salaries are at $98M. Then we sign fake WCS to a $5M contract. Our salaries are at $103M, but we can use the rookie exception to sign WCS. Now we trade fake JT/Nik/Landry to the Sixers for the second round picks taking no salary back - they make fake $25M combined, so our salary drops to $78M and we get a trade exception for $25M. (Technically I think this trade exception would be three smaller ones in the size of the three contracts we sent...but that's not material.)
Now - we have $78M in salaries and $25M in trade exception(s). That's $103M against the cap, because the trade exception counts against the cap. So we can't sign any free agents. But we want to sign fake Belinelli to $9M and fake Koufos to $13M. If we renounce the trade exception(s), we have enough cap space to do this. But, poof!, the trade exception(s) are gone when we renounce them to sign Beli/Koufos.
So can we create the trade exception? Sure. Can we sign players while keeping the trade exception? No. I hope the above made sense.
Duncan, Parker and Ginobili (if he returns) are all a year older and they lost Joseph and Splitter who were key role players. LaMarcus Aldridge is a great player and Leonard is still growing into a star but I'm not sure they are the surefire #1 or #2 seed that some are making them out to be.