Section 101
All-Star
Hey, I resemble that remark.![]()
You've past old and moved to ancient!
Hey, I resemble that remark.![]()
Carmichael Dave Verified account@CarmichaelDave 5h5 hours ago
Bittersweet to announce that @kayte_c is leaving me for her TV job this Friday, but get it. She hates me. She won’t be a stranger though.
------------------------------------------------
It's her Kings TV job, in case anyone thought she was leaving Sacramento. This could mean more camera time for our girl Kayte.![]()
LOL I was about to ask, thought the underline was a signature but didn't read it until I was about to reply, as it came up in the quote.
Epic rant by CD this morning. Encompassed everything I, and I'm sure others, feel
Grant & Doug just did a great interview with Joerger.
Were talking about Randolph some, their recent success on the road, the young players development & minutes. I'm not sure if they do a online rebroadcast or anything, but was worth the time.
I'm still learning about podcasts but this sounds like something I'd like to hear, especially when Doug asks the questions because he truly knows whereof he speaks. Guess I'm gonna have to try and find it. Thanks for the heads up.![]()
I heard it too. Steve was dudes name. He was pretty much bitchin and I don' disagree with Grants premise. I don' even disagree with Grants going off on him. Dude wouldn't even have a conversation, it was just ***** and moan. I felt the same way as Doug, the team could have won 30-35 games but Grant made an excellent point that that win total is treadmill. We need to develop the rookies and young cats and get a high draft pick and shoot for a stud. Then the rebuild should be complete.I listened to The Fiery One for the like 5 minutes yesterday for the first time in a long while. Grant told a STH to not renew his season tickets if he was upset with the Kings switching to tank mode now, and that it was ridiculous to ever think they would win anything this year.
![]()
I heard it too. Steve was dudes name. He was pretty much bitchin and I don' disagree with Grants premise. I don' even disagree with Grants going off on him. Dude wouldn't even have a conversation, it was just ***** and moan. I felt the same way as Doug, the team could have won 30-35 games but Grant made an excellent point that that win total is treadmill. We need to develop the rookies and young cats and get a high draft pick and shoot for a stud. Then the rebuild should be complete.
Yeah, I totally get that point. I think Grant just got pissed off and let dude have it. But THAT'S his shtick lol. Too bad Steve didn' ask Doug instead. Would have been better for himFor sure, but if I paid thousands of dollars for season tickets and had a Kings employee yell at me to not renew my season tickets if I wasn't happy with tanking then I'd be all
It's a radio show, and I get his tactics for going Stephen A. Smith on this guy, but the two hats always makes me chuckle. Wouldn't be surprised if he is pushing a ticket pack or single game tickets for the next game tonight on the telecast.![]()
Most people’s morality only extends to “Do I like this person or not?”
I listened to The Fiery One for the like 5 minutes yesterday for the first time in a long while. Grant told a STH to not renew his season tickets if he was upset with the Kings switching to tank mode now, and that it was ridiculous to ever think they would win anything this year.
![]()
Kid's trying too hard.For those that don't love Peaches, there is a funny twitter account WokeGrantNapear.
I would like to know who is "excusing" him for his behavior.I think it would be fascinating to explore how and when we as consumers are okay excusing assholish behavior from someone because, "THAT'S his shtick," and how and when we're not.
EDIT - Or, to quote my favorite follow on Twitter:
Well that would be making an assumption and we all know what the person making an assumption looks like.From my perspective, hand-waving/blowing off the behavior with a dismissive "That's his shtick" is as close to 'excusing' as makes no odds. YMOV
Well that would be making an assumption and we all know what the person making an assumption looks like.
When I said what I said about that's his shtick, in my mind, I was thinking it should surprise no one. Not to excuse the behavior. Just that it isn't surprising considering the source.
Next time if you need clarification just ask. Don't assume.