Wasn't aware of that option. Probably why my daughter thinks I'm a dinosaur. Thanks.I respond to notes byclicking on New Posts. I don't have a clue where the note is posted.
Is it really necessary to put an anti-DMC rant on a Off-The-Court thread topic about KHTK?
The interview part is fine - some topical questions replied to honestly, sprinkled in with fluff friendly questions to get Boogie talking at ease....I listened to part 1 and 2 of Dave's interview with DMC. Pretty honest responses IMHO and the kinds of questions I as a fan wanted answers to. DMC didn't pull any punches.
Dave said at the outset that Boogie fans would love the interview and those who hate him probably wouldn't change their minds.
All I'm asking of people is that they actually sit and listen to the interview with an open mind. I think you'll appreciate his honesty if nothing else.
Thanks, Dave.
The interview part is fine - some topical questions replied to honestly, sprinkled in with fluff friendly questions to get Boogie talking at ease....
The problem is the second it jumps back to the trio of themcommentingpontificating about the interview, its like they are acting like Judge, Jury, and Executioner on Boogie.
Who the hell deemed Nate Lord of All Things Kings?
Where the hell does he get off acting like he is the resident Master of Boogie, and it's his role to be as negative as he can about him at all times?
It's really a joke, what Nate sprays out of his mouth regarding Cousins nowadays.
Dave is the leader of the show, and he should be reigning Nate in, unless he likes keeping that same hyper-negative vibe that Napear's show has gone off the rails with (which flies in the face of Dave's constant "pro-Cousins stance" as well as his unprecedented access he got for this interview).
Kayte seems uncomfortable with Nate's constant diatribes against Cousins, since the few times I've listened in, she seldom seems to add in or comment on his takes.
The interview part is fine - some topical questions replied to honestly, sprinkled in with fluff friendly questions to get Boogie talking at ease....
The problem is the second it jumps back to the trio of themcommentingpontificating about the interview, its like they are acting like Judge, Jury, and Executioner on Boogie.
Who the hell deemed Nate Lord of All Things Kings?
Where the hell does he get off acting like he is the resident Master of Boogie, and it's his role to be as negative as he can about him at all times?
It's really a joke, what Nate sprays out of his mouth regarding Cousins nowadays.
Dave is the leader of the show, and he should be reigning Nate in, unless he likes keeping that same hyper-negative vibe that Napear's show has gone off the rails with (which flies in the face of Dave's constant "pro-Cousins stance" as well as his unprecedented access he got for this interview).
Kayte seems uncomfortable with Nate's constant diatribes against Cousins, since the few times I've listened in, she seldom seems to add in or comment on his takes.
Opinions can't be wrong, but man you and u disagree.
"Reign Nate in"? From what, saying what he thinks? What are we, North Korea? Shall we stifle all "negative" opinions?
Challenge his points. I may not agree with his sentiment all the time, but I understand his thinking. He even said yesterday he hates being the negative guy on DMC but it's his truth. And I'd be lying if I didn't admit that there's a chance HE is the right one and I'm delusional.
The only thing I can't handle on the radio are manufactured opinions that are there simply to create arguments. Other than that, just be real. Nate is being real. His points are valid. We just interpret things differently.
As far as "Lord of all things Boogie", are you not familiar with radio? It's his, and my, job to offer strong opinions. You may disagree, but we are supposed to and need to say what we think with conviction. That's our job.
I'll bet I know the answer to this- have you ever called in? If you have such an issue with Nate and think he's off base, why not challenge him on it? Challenge him on the logic, not on the fact that he didn't go out and dye himself purple.
Really, the only way it would work (and be better radio) is if they invited someone into the studio to debate Nate's hyper-negative Cousins stances.An interesting little challenge.
I have never once wasted my time calling into a radio show, let alone one in CA. However, while I have no doubt what would happen if I tried it with Grant, as he has both an ego and a reputation to protect, I am a little interested in who is sitting on the cutoff button on your show and who gets to make that call.
Tony Xypteras @TonyXypteras 2m2 minutes ago
Cousins was asked what job he would never want to do if he was punished for eternity to do it, and he said 'probably work next to Ailene'
Tony Xypteras @TonyXypteras 56s56 seconds ago
More Cousins on worst job ever: "If I had to look at her every day... her and Andy"
--------------------------------------------------------------
You may not like DeMarcus Cousins, but you cannot fault him for calling out his enemies. Good on him!!!
An interesting little challenge.
I have never once wasted my time calling into a radio show, let alone one in CA. However, while I have no doubt what would happen if I tried it with Grant, as he has both an ego and a reputation to protect, I am a little interested in who is sitting on the cutoff button on your show and who gets to make that call.
Really, the only way it would work (and be better radio) is if they invited someone into the studio to debate Nate's hyper-negative Cousins stances.
How about it, Dave?
We certainly don;t have manufactured opinions, we are real, and we would offer you strong opinions so that your sacrifices to the hyperbole gods would be appeased.
When did he make these remarks?
He also said (in response to the "If heaven exists, what would you want to hear when you arrive at the Pearly Gates?" question) that he'd like to hear Grant Napear tell him he loves him.
![]()
Tony Xypteras @TonyXypteras 2m2 minutes ago
Cousins was asked what job he would never want to do if he was punished for eternity to do it, and he said 'probably work next to Ailene'
Tony Xypteras @TonyXypteras 56s56 seconds ago
More Cousins on worst job ever: "If I had to look at her every day... her and Andy"
--------------------------------------------------------------
You may not like DeMarcus Cousins, but you cannot fault him for calling out his enemies. Good on him!!!
Is Andy, Andrew?
No. Andy Furillo - also of the Bee.
Probably a few minutes before Voisen penned the article that Boogie could be traded.
When did he make these remarks?
Some of the info we get about the Kings come from petty low life people with axes to grind hiding behind the fact they are newscasters of some sort. I appreciate solid news. It's a shame I have to know the biases of the sources of the info.
Furillo is a complete hack, reading him reminds me of reading a college newspaper article obviously written 20 minutes before the deadline and no editorial oversight.No. Andy Furillo - also of the Bee.
You know Dave, I haven't agreed with you recently, but it wasn;t until THIS POST that I actively lost respect for you.
This is one of the more disingenuous, and purposely misleading (playing dumb) posts I've ever read from someone who (for the most part) I believe usually puts together cogent thoughts.
Grant is impervious to "being killed" for anything he says.
He is the grand poobah of his domain - the BMOC of KTHK.
None of you have the balls, or internal clout, to call him on even the dumbest, pettiest, most incorrect statements he makes.
I believe the only thing stopping the players from calling him on his poopoo is that they don;t want to be seen as having beef with the Kings mouthpiece and biggest muckraker - hell, they have seen what vitriole and incessant abuse Grant has heaped on Demarcus for six straight years - what hope would THEY have against Grant's ire?
To be honest, your playing of Grant as a guy going against the fanbase and speaking up for the truth is disgusting, and infuriates me.
By definition, if Grant was remotely honest in his intentions, he wouldn;t be hiding behind his call screener and yell, abuse, and ridicule, then hang up on anyone who remotely questions his takes.
Do you know what "sycophant" means?
Go ahead - look it up, I'll wait.
Listen to any random broadcast of Grant's - his entire caller pool is made of of sycophants who echo his negative, Cuz-demonizing mindset.
Have you even listened to Grant without your blinders from your personal experiences with the man in place?
And to answer your shockingly-naive question, I'll tell you how Grant benefits from manipulating the fanbase to get Demarcus off the team:
Because as long as Demarcus is here, Boogie is the leader in the lockerroom through sheer talent alone - that makes him Big Dog in the lockerroom, and influences the other guys away from giving Grant interviews: how many times have you heard Demarcus, Rondo, Willie, or Rudy on Grant's show?
Having Demarcus on the team DECREASES Grant's control over the lockerroom and the organization.
He's made it blatantly clear, over 6 years of slander and manipulation of what callers get airtime, that he will stop at nothing to get Demarcus offthis team.
And we all know that not having Demarcus on the team would make the team worse (see the past 6 years of evidence of one of the worst teams in the league without DMC) and we all know the Kings wouldn;t get equal trade back for him, so let's work to the logical conclusion, shall we?
Grant knowingly and actively is trying to make the Kings team WORSE by poisoning the fanbase against Demarcus to get him out of here, for his own personal gain, for his own petty agenda.
So don't you dare come on to a hardcore Kings fan board and pander to Grant and try to make it out like he's just looking out for the team and his version of the truth, while suffering slings and arrows saying it.
Agreed. I value your closeness to the fans, @carmichaeldave . Keep it up.I think CD is great for Kings fans and radio. The fact that he occasionally gets on here and banters with us gives the fan base a reminder that he came from where we are. CD, I do not always agree with you (realistically, Grant is the ONLY thing we disagree about as far as the Kings go) but I love your willingness to get on here and mix it up. Keep it up @carmichaeldave