I have EVERY RIGHT to hate a team based on them leaving. The Kings are Sacramento's team.. You expect people to be happy they are leaving? As someone not even in Sac you don't know how people feel here except for maybe this forum and what you see on TV. It goes much much deeper than that..
Again.. The Bengal analogy. I don't expect you of all people to understand. I for one wouldn't go into a hornets nest at go-bengals.com and tell them that their team will be great in Sacramento because I want them to be here, and that I like them. That's incredibly rude to do so and it's incredibly rude for you to think you understand how each one of us feels.
Let us be pissed.. We are losing something VERY dear to all of us. Don't sit back in OC and tell us we need to understand, or that YOU understand how we feel. And I don't care about Howard Schultz. I care about the tons of Kings fans here in Sac that don't want the Kings to leave and that are pissed off at both the Maloofs, and the local govt for dragging their feet..
As for myself I had been a season ticket holder from 2003 to 2007 and my family was from 1990 to 2009.
Abd how could you say "Don't get pissed at me because I think you're being unfair in your insistence that nothing matters except that they stay."?????
How about stop arguing with the people that are pissed off and telling them they ar being unfair? WE ARE LOSING OUR TEAM.. YOU ARE NOT.
Again.. The Bengal analogy. I don't expect you of all people to understand. I for one wouldn't go into a hornets nest at go-bengals.com and tell them that their team will be great in Sacramento because I want them to be here, and that I like them. That's incredibly rude to do so and it's incredibly rude for you to think you understand how each one of us feels.
Let us be pissed.. We are losing something VERY dear to all of us. Don't sit back in OC and tell us we need to understand, or that YOU understand how we feel. And I don't care about Howard Schultz. I care about the tons of Kings fans here in Sac that don't want the Kings to leave and that are pissed off at both the Maloofs, and the local govt for dragging their feet..
As for myself I had been a season ticket holder from 2003 to 2007 and my family was from 1990 to 2009.
Abd how could you say "Don't get pissed at me because I think you're being unfair in your insistence that nothing matters except that they stay."?????
How about stop arguing with the people that are pissed off and telling them they ar being unfair? WE ARE LOSING OUR TEAM.. YOU ARE NOT.
2) The Kings are the Maloofs team, technically, which is why they can move them. I understand the connection between the community and the team. But ownership goes both ways. If the city of Sacramento wants to claim ownership of the team, they need to give them a place to play.
3) I don't expect anyone to be happy they are leaving. In your anger, you aren't understanding me. First of all, I am NOT the OP who came in saying that we'd take great care of the Kings. I am the one saying that I don't want them to leave because it would suck for Sacramento, even though I live and work within 20 minutes of the Honda Center. I don't care. They need to stay. I hope they stay.
4) The entire point of all my posts has been that I don't understand how you feel. I am not pretending that I do.
5) Again, I think the Kings should stay. I'm just saying that there's a difference between Schultz selling Seattle out and the Maloofs feeling forced into a move. If they were to sell the team to Samueli, then I wouldn't blame you. But they've been working on an arena for years. They obviously want to stay. You saying you don't care about Schultz while at the same time pushing a hypothetical Bengals analogy that has zero relevance is backward. I'm just pointing out the difference between ownership that doesn't give a damn about the community (Schultz) and ownership that clearly does (Maloofs). For all their mistakes, they very obviously want to get a deal done in Sacramento. You give them no credit for that.
6) Since 2008, the Kings have had the worst attendance in the NBA, percentage-wise. Whatever prompted you to give up your season tickets in 2007, I'm sure you didn't want to. And I would bet that you still go to games now and then, and if money grew on trees, you'd probably be at even more games. And the product hasn't been very good since then, and it probably wouldn't matter. But you say the Kings are Sacramento's team, and they really should be, but 77.3% attendance over four seasons makes an ownership group wonder. The Maloofs deserve a lot of blame -- maybe all of it -- for the poor product for several seasons now. But they get outdrawn by virtually every team in the NBA, including the Clippers, who everyone knows are never going to be good. That's a factor as well.
7) Being pissed off is one thing. I can even get pissed for you. But this divisive "you're not a local, you don't know anything" attitude is garbage. I'm a fan just like you are, regardless where I live. Like I said before, we're on the same side.
8) What I think is unfair is that, even though Sacramento has to this point been unwilling/unable to get an arena deal done with the Kings, and even if it looks like there will never be a deal, you don't care. If they move, they're dead to you. I understand being mad, but again, what are they supposed to do? Just continue to play in one of the most outdated arenas in the league? And keep losing money in the process? That's what's not fair. I think what would be fair would be to acknowledge the legitimacy of why they are considering moving, rather than just lumping them in with every other sports team that's ever changed cities.
I don't mean to argue, or to make it worse. I'm not the OP, remember that. All I'm saying is that I don't get why, with the present circumstances, the Kings would be hated by Sacramento natives, if they were to move. Again, under the present circumstances, because I think they're relevant.