SLAB
Hall of Famer
Vlade and co are getting ready to sign Demarcus Cousins back to Sacramento. And it starts with dumping Papa G to undo the "God help me" tweet from DMC when Papa G was drafted.![]()
That brings me right back on board.

Vlade and co are getting ready to sign Demarcus Cousins back to Sacramento. And it starts with dumping Papa G to undo the "God help me" tweet from DMC when Papa G was drafted.![]()
...My issue is more however the constant change of direction. Sign George Hill then trade him for nothing 6 months later. Draft Pappa as a project and cut him 18 months into his pro career. You knew he was a project when you drafted him!!
The Kings are just reinforcing the perception of a rudderless ship and as GM that is Vlade’s fault.
It's not Kayte, nor is it anyone else within the Kings organization. Double-K has been a member here since before the great crash of September 2004. His avatar doesn't reflect who he is any more than mine does.![]()
How long have you been a Kings Fan? Those of us who have been here since the 90’s or longer realize Sacramento is not a free agent destination. So you have to use your cap space to acquire assets and then draft well. When we had Jeff we did draft well and went to the play-offs. Pinning your hopes on free agency is a mirage.
I think you can say you had two picks that were complete misses. Now to be fair, I would guess the Kings agree as the fired their director of scouting mid-season which is highly unusual but as the GM Vlade has to share some of the blame.
My issue is more however the constant change of direction. Sign George Hill then trade him for nothing 6 months later. Draft Pappa as a project and cut him 18 months into his pro career. You knew he was a project when you drafted him!!
The Kings are just reinforcing the perception of a rudderless ship and as GM that is Vlade’s fault.
I think you might be right. Then they cut him a couple of days later I think and people say Kings FO is incompetent.Is this what you were thinking of?
http://www.espn.com/nba/story/_/id/...suns-get-regular-contract-having-two-way-deal
I have been a Kings fan since well before Kings were good.How long have you been a Kings Fan? Those of us who have been here since the 90’s or longer realize Sacramento is not a free agent destination. So you have to use your cap space to acquire assets and then draft well. When we had Jeff we did draft well and went to the play-offs. Pinning your hopes on free agency is a mirage.
His tenure as a Kings fan is irrelevant. His argument is every bit as valid as yours. When we had Geoff, we got most of our talent through trades, not the draft. Mike Bibby - trade, Doug Christie - trade, Peja - draft, Chris Webber - trade, Vlade Divac - free agency, Bobby Jackson - trade.
I think you might be right. Then they cut him a couple of days later I think and people say Kings FO is incompetent.
I have been a Kings fan since well before Kings were good.
I never said we should pin our hopes on getting a superstar talent in FA. What having cap room allows us to do is remain in the conversation with these players or at the very least use the cap space to facilitate a trade for assets but don't let that get in a way of a good rant.
Kings will have a good pick in this year's draft and should get a pretty good young players. What cap room allows is to go and sit down and maybe drop a max deal on Parker or Gordon or even Hood and see if their current teams would match it. Sure it doesn't guarantee that we get either of them but with not many teams having cap room it puts you in the conversation.
Last time I checked, a long time ago this franchise's fortunes changed when they traded for a troubled young star, drafted in mid lottery and signed a FA by the name of Vlade Divac. I am not saying it will happen again but unless you have the cap flexibility, you are not going to be able to be in the conversation for any trade that can get you a star from a team that want to dump their salary and rebuild nor will it allow you to even attempt to convince someone to sign with the Kings.
Kings are openly targeting season 2019-2020 to be playing the .500 ball and push for the play offs.
Who was drafted in the first round after Papa and Mal would you have chosen? The fact is it was a weak draft. Vlade did well to get Bogie and Skal with the #8 pick. Bruno is a result of the Philly tradeSigned Belinelli with some of the cap room created. Belinelli traded for the pick used to select Mal. Mal traded for Bruno. If Bruno turns into a rotation player does it make the Philly trade good?
George Hill was NEVER the player we thought he would be. Neither was Papa. Which is the better move? Keeping them around because you don't want to look like you made a mistake? Or acknowledge that they didn't work out and stop the bleeding?
That's not a rudderless ship, my friend. That's a ship whose captain isn't afraid to change course to adapt to current conditions.
Aren’t we cutting Bruno?
It could also be argued it's also a ship who's captain is a clueless buffoon.
Brad Miller was a FA signing but it required a sign and trade because Kings lacked the cap room and Indy were not willing to lose him for nothing.Right and only Vlade was a free agent! Webber almost didn’t come and cried on his way here. Your post validates my point.
Please post other than Vlade any significant free agent in the prime of their career that signed here? The closest I can think of is Hill and we just gave him away for a bag of rocks.
Not according to what Carmichael Dave tweeted this afternoon. See the Welcome to the Kings Bruno thread.
Brad Miller was a FA signing but it required a sign and trade because Kings lacked the cap room and Indy were not willing to lose him for nothing.
Cap space is not only valuable in FA but in providing you trade flexibility. Let's not forget that so many deals were done where the team decides to rebuild and trade away their star for expiring contracts and young players. Hell we did it with Boogie and IIRC Golden State got Baron Davis for two fifths of sweet **** all!
I think you are missing the point. If you have cap room and expiring deals, it means that a team can trade you a player on a bigger salary than what you are trading out. You only need to match the salary if you don't have enough cap space to absorb the contract.I agree in terms of trade flexibility but I’m not sure this trade helps us much.
The trade flexibility is more when you can match contracts. The Hill contract was excellent for Trade flexibility next year because it had the team option for the third year. We just gave that away for Shumpert. I don’t see it as a win but as a loss. Hill could be traded for an expensive contract and a young player. Shumpert can’t. To me in terms of trade flexibility this trade was a loser.
I think you are missing the point. If you have cap room and expiring deals, it means that a team can trade you a player on a bigger salary than what you are trading out. You only need to match the salary if you don't have enough cap space to absorb the contract.
I see Hill thing differently. He is overpaid as is but if you keep him around for the rest of the season, I think he loses value. He would not get as many minutes because as soon as Mason is back, he and Fox will get a lot of minutes here. He would be coming off a career worst season. Plus he has a year left at $19 m plus a $1m buyout for the following year.
Now with Shumpert you have $11m on your books and $8m in cap space. If another team wants to trade to us a $20m per season type player next season, we can accomodate the trade by trading them Shumpert who has an expiring contract. It save the team a few million in that season plus they get a player off the books.
I think Hills contract was pretty problematic to be honest. It was the largest contract traded at the deadline. Its pretty obvious from the deals that got done that most teams want to reduce their payroll. Two summers of inflated contracts will do that to a league.
George Hill was NEVER the player we thought he would be. Neither was Papa. Which is the better move? Keeping them around because you don't want to look like you made a mistake? Or acknowledge that they didn't work out and stop the bleeding?
That's not a rudderless ship, my friend. That's a ship whose captain isn't afraid to change course to adapt to current conditions.
but he's only 20! why can't he be the next Gasol 2.0. he's chubby like him.You mean he was not a Marc Gasol II
I'm honestly out as a Kings fan if we don't get a top 5 pick. There's no reason why this team should be winning games late in the season on the backs of vets who have no future as a King.I feel like brick did the right thing leaving this team.. Maybe we're all fools to keep cheering for the kings.
Don't let the door hit you on the way out.I feel like brick did the right thing leaving this team.. Maybe we're all fools to keep cheering for the kings.
I'm honestly out as a Kings fan if we don't get a top 5 pick. There's no reason why this team should be winning games late in the season on the backs of vets who have no future as a King.
Don't let the door hit you on the way out.
I'm honestly out as a Kings fan if we don't get a top 5 pick. There's no reason why this team should be winning games late in the season on the backs of vets who have no future as a King.
I disagree. George would have been a valuable trade piece next year with the team option and 1M buy out. That was why you signed that contract in the first place. Give the kids two years to develop and then see what you can get.
While I didn’t love the heavy vet make them earn it play this year it was absolutely the right play next year when we don’t have our draft pick. Hill was a steadying influence in our back court and a good teacher. That’s why we signed him and those reasons didn’t change in 6 months.
Lol no one is giving up a first round pick for anyone these days outside of the all star/franchise player type, and certainly not for George Hill.It’s still not good IMO. I wanted a first or a prospect for the Hill/Shump, but it looks like we waited til the end for anything else to appear...
I just thought that Hill’s ability to bounce back surpassed the difference between him and Shump but I guess we will see how that money is spent
It also kind of smarts that Hill is getting his way of moaning to a contender after the contempt I’ve drawn for him
Lebron and PG aren’t going to LA, IMO as they still wouldn’t even win the conferenceI think this pretty much sums it up and to why the deal was done. Its about creating cap flexibility. We now have three "semi-expiring" deals and an expiring deal in Carter.
So Carter's $8million come off the book, Temple and Kosta are likely to opt out so that's another ~$17M so you have coming off the books plus some $8m saving on Hill's contract compared to Shumpert. Essentially, the Kings will have a MAX room in FA this summer. While Kings are unlikely to get a superstar with their money, they can get themselves a pretty darn good player.
Keeping Hills for longer would have made him a dead asset for us. He was not going to get any more playing time or getting featured more so by summer, you have a player due $20m and coming off a career worst year.
We got out of that deal on time. It would have been more preferable to dump the contract for expirings but that was always going to be a pretty difficult proposition.
I do find it somewhat funny that CLE helped LAL clear the cap space for LeBron and PG13 in te summer![]()
Lebron and PG aren’t going to LA, IMO as they still wouldn’t even win the conference