Hell hath frozen over! -- Ailene Voisin: Decisive Adelman deserves new deal

coolhandluke

Starter
Ailene Voisin: Decisive Adelman deserves new deal

By Ailene Voisin -- Bee Sports Columnist

Published 2:15 am PDT Friday, May 5, 2006

231929-0505adelman.jpg


There he is, stalking the sidelines.

There he is, benching ineffective starters.

There he is, confronting his superstar.

There he is, stressing defense.

There he is - finally - making difficult decisions without regard to locker room politics, team salary structures or even his own job security. Or perhaps because he has so little job security left, Rick Adelman has been empowered and emboldened, has become a more forceful authority figure whose players have rushed back to his side while muscling their way into an extended series against the defending champion San Antonio Spurs.

That hot spot at the end of the Kings' bench should have a new sign: seat occupied.

Adelman is the best candidate for his job.

Regardless of the series' outcome, the Maloofs should scratch out another contract and let the Kings and their coach continue on their way. This is no time to strip the franchise of a momentum that began when Artest arrived, survived a brief dip late, and swung right back into a Game 6 tonight at Arco Arena.

Different era, different team, different coach. Or maybe this is just a peeved and purposeful coach on the offensive, his team's heightened defensive tenacity and mental resilience notwithstanding. Whatever the motivation, things have changed.

If Artest has lifted an entire franchise with his massive hands and outsized personality - and he has - Adelman has been right there offering directions, demanding answers, refusing to allow another Chris Webber situation to develop. He is governing by a clearly defined set of rules. His. His decisions continue to elicit healthy, heated debate - hey, this is sports, not cardiac surgery - but he no longer seems to be looking over his shoulder, wondering whether Webber is brooding or Geoff Petrie is disappointed or the Maloofs are plotting another run at Phil Jackson.

When engaging in any coaching analysis, of course, the relevant questions are these: Has the incumbent maximized his talent, and if not, is a superior candidate available? And the answers, in order, are yes and no.

Jackson is doing marvelous work in L.A., Gregg Popovich isn't going anywhere until his Timmy retires, Jerry Sloan is embedded in Salt Lake City, and Adelman is continuing to earn a raise as we speak.

Indeed, if the careers of players and coaches are defined by postseason performances - and I firmly believe they are - his leadership during these past few weeks, coupled with his years of service, counts for plenty. Counts for dollars and sense. His roster manipulation and demonstrative, even combative demeanor, in fact, represent nothing short of a seismic shift.

Based on both his words and deeds, he is fretting less about egos and more about matchups. Defense matters. My, my, my. My previous and much-discussed differences with Adelman can be traced to his reluctance to confront his stars, to his failure to utilize his bench and to an organizational disdain for discipline, the absence of which fosters only an illusion of harmony and eventual success.

Who cares who dines together?

More than two players on a mattress dooms a marriage anyway.

No, just a hunch here, but Rick Adelman might never again be so beloved by his players. This Adelman probably would have subbed for Jason Williams before John Stockton's last-second jumper in 1999, would have canceled the pity party following the referee's theft of Game 6 against the Lakers in 2002, would have left the fearless Bobby Jackson on the floor in Game 7, and certainly would have been more assertive with Webber.

Why exactly was a hobbled C-Webb allowed to dictate his playing time, in essence crippling the team with the league's best record at the time of his return (March, 2004)? That still grates. That one lingers.

But that's also the distant past. More recent developments offer an increasingly flattering portrayal. The man is coaching like all those other coaches who know their X's and O's, who appear resigned to coaching's routinely short tenure, who acknowledge that coddling stars only corrupts a team's prospects. Disagree with Adelman's decision to play Brad Miller during the final minutes in Game 5? Disapprove of a tight rotation that forces the starters to play marathon minutes? (Who spells Mike Bibby? The disappointing Jason Hart?) Question the selection and frequency of Artest's field-goal attempts in the opening minutes of Game 5?

Yet did you notice Adelman's visibly perturbed reaction? Did you hear him berate his starters for sluggish defensive rotations during those final timeouts? Did you observe the way his Kings responded after the first two emotionally numbing losses in San Antonio?

No, while Adelman should reward the Maloofs with breakfast, lunch and dinner for their patience during the Kings' three-month stagger earlier this season - and the silence at Arco before the Artest trade certainly warrants a historical franchise footnote - he has every right and reason to stretch his spine.

Artest brought the Kings back.

Adelman took it from there.

Link
 
love_them_kings said:
Well, she may have eased up on Adelman, but, wow, she still has it in for CWebb, doesn't she??? ;)

I was thinking the same thing. At least she kept it down to a couple sentences this time....
 
I was driving home from work the other day and I seen her next to me in her SUV. I work on the same street as the Sac Bee.
 
i'd be suspicious of anyone who needs to be 'playing for a contract' suddenly getting good, including a coach. maybe he needs to coach in one year contracts. or maybe rick carlisle would be available - he's done a good job coaching in the past several years considering the situations he's had.
 
I don't know that hell has completely frozen over -- she still managed her fair share of digs -- but it's certainly getting a little nippy down there.
 
Dave McNulla said:
i'd be suspicious of anyone who needs to be 'playing for a contract' suddenly getting good, including a coach. maybe he needs to coach in one year contracts. or maybe rick carlisle would be available - he's done a good job coaching in the past several years considering the situations he's had.

Bonzi has arguably been our best player all year and pretty consistent except when injured. He's come back from an injury and he and Artest have been going at it the past couple months trying to improve their games. Yes, there is an extra effort because of the playoffs, I think, but lots of guys pick it up in the offseason.

Rick has been Rick all year, and the Kings have been in the PO since he arrived. Why do you bring him up in this discussion? I don't see why he's relevent....
 
i didn't mean for it to sound bad. adelman has been a good coach for the longest time, and that's not easy to do. he's only had 2 (full) losing seasons in 17, both with golden state. i just think maybe he could have become defensive-minded a little sooner. carlisle would do that from day one.
 
Dave McNulla said:
i didn't mean for it to sound bad. adelman has been a good coach for the longest time, and that's not easy to do. he's only had 2 (full) losing seasons in 17, both with golden state. i just think maybe he could have become defensive-minded a little sooner. carlisle would do that from day one.

make no mistake: adelman is an offensive-minded coach. he has always stressed defense, but offense typically comes first, and thats because its what he's good at teaching. the problem is, he hasn't always had the defensive personnel, so people tend to think that adelman could care less about about defense, and that's patently false. he may not be the best out there, but rick adelman is a damn good coach. he's been just as key as bonzi wells or ron artest this post season in dictating the pace of the games. game 1 notwithstanding, adelman has done well in preparing his team for each game and has adjusted accordingly in order to exploit san antonio's weaknesses, which are far and few between. adelman deserves the respect of a new contract from the maloofs. while the collapse of the first half of the season falls to adelman, in part, the rise of the second half of the season must also be credited to adelman, in part, as well as this explosion in the postseason.

it makes me happy to see voison admit that adelman has done well with so little to work with. he's always done well in maximizing the talent of his players. but now he's coaching with a chip on his shoulder. he's adopting the "me against the world" attitude that the kings, as a team, have adopted. his team, with few exceptions, look like junkyard dogs out there. adelman is coaching like a junkyard dog as well, and despite being down 3-2, he has gotten the better of gregg popovich thus far in the postseason.
 
Dave McNulla said:
i didn't mean for it to sound bad. adelman has been a good coach for the longest time, and that's not easy to do. he's only had 2 (full) losing seasons in 17, both with golden state. i just think maybe he could have become defensive-minded a little sooner. carlisle would do that from day one.
Carlisle + Artest = Big NO.:eek:
 
Dave McNulla said:
i'd be suspicious of anyone who needs to be 'playing for a contract' suddenly getting good, including a coach. maybe he needs to coach in one year contracts. or maybe rick carlisle would be available - he's done a good job coaching in the past several years considering the situations he's had.

How soon they forget...Rick Carlisle?

Our franchise player is Ron Artest. ;)
 
I'm impressed with the article.

She even addresses her issues with Adelman. If even Ailene Voisin can see that Adelman needs to stay, then I certainly hope Joe and Gavin are reaching for their wallets.
 
VF21 said:
I'm impressed with the article.

She even addresses her issues with Adelman. If even Ailene Voisin can see that Adelman needs to stay, then I certainly hope Joe and Gavin are reaching for their wallets.

just from previous experiences - wouldn't this article be a sign that RA is gone ?
 
If you say so.

I'm pumped about the game, I'm pumped about an excellent review of what Adelman has done for the team.

Sorry, piksi, but I'm just not in the mood to look for the dark lining.
 
I'm impressed with her lack of basic understanding of coaching in the NBA. Exposed as just another wannabe tough gal (in this case) who wouldn't know how to lead a pack of lemmings.

You know, I've got some news for her one more time-- Rick Adleman did not suddenly learn to coach after his 750th career win. Nor did he suddenly learn to coach like you would like him too.

Woman needs a hobby.
 
Bricklayer said:
I'm impressed with her lack of basic understanding of coaching in the NBA. Exposed as just another wannabe tough gal (in this case) who wouldn't know how to lead a pack of lemmings.


Serisouly. What successful NBA coach "confronts his stars"? You can prod your stars like Pop, or Jedi-mind trick them like Phil. You can even give them tough love like Sloan. But if you "confront" them your team will not be very good, and you will be an assistant or college coach again real quick. Just ask Pitino and PJ Carlesimo.
 
Back
Top