So is I said earlier that the Sacramento media is soft on Karl, never questioning his schemes/style of play. You also have to ask how soft has the local crappy media been on Cousins throughout his tenure here? How much of his antics/attitude issues get swept under the rug simply because its Sacramento media?
Why can a team like the Celtics with a bunch of run of the mill NBA talent be a solid NBA team, one that is well coached and play hard and together for 48 minutes. We look like a team with a bunch of agendas going on. Everyone is to blame from Karl, Cousins on down. No more excuses for anyone, we are playing like crap and it makes me sick. The only player that has been a pleasure to watch is the "cancer" signing Rondo. No wonder he won an NBA championship, you can see his winning attitude even amongst this filth of mediocrity and losers that surround him.
Because the Celtics know excactly, how they wanted to play and assembled the players around this idea.
I mean all it takes is to watch one Celtic game to get the point.
The Celtics are designed for maximum spacing, ball movement and maximum defensive pressure on perimeter players. This is obviously a pretty solid idea, when the value of the 3pointer is at an all time high, because all the defense is allowed to do is to put a hand up without getting too close to the shooter, and most teams will beat you from the perimeter.
You can't single out one or two players of the Celtics as an opposing coach and focus all your attention on slowing them down.
You try to slow down IT? Well the floor is wide open for players like Bradley, Crowder, Sully or Olynyk to get wide open looks. And it takes only a limited amount of talent to knock these type of shots down.
The offensive strategy of the Celtics starts with the high pick&roll with two players, that can shoot, over and over again. It's a simple basketball play with a very minor error rate. And the defense is forced to move right from the start and will give up an open jumpshot more often than not. This play is Bradleys bread an butter - screen - defender goes under the screen, shoot - defender trys to fight through the screen, drive or move the ball.
With us it's completely different. The moment you manage to slow down Cousins or Rudy the odds are against us. Our chances to get a win are close to zero.
We seldomly get wide open looks, once the defense collapses on Cuz or Rudy. Why? Because nobody needs to be afraid of KK, Willie or Rondo. Versus the Kings you can shrink the floor, force Cuz to be a perimeter player, force Rudy to attack from the 3pt line and you have a decent chance to win the game.
The lack of space will result in TO's and forced shots and this will lead to layups and open 3's in transition for our opponents. Celtics and Rockets executed this very well. Time and time again they attacked our defense early out of our mistakes on the offensive end. And even if the spacing is there from time to time (mostly with the smaller lineups) the error rate of Cousins and Rudy is still too high.
Mostly because plays for Cuz or Rudy start with them attacking 1vs1 without any screening, than driving inside 1vs the whole interior D and trying to hoist up a shot or dump the ball in heavy traffic.
Now which is the simpler play? The high pick&roll with a wide open floor, because everybody draws the defender out to the 3point line.
Or the 1vs1 play in heavy traffic, because the defense will give Rondo, Willie or KK and even Gay open shots, just to stop Cuz and force TO's?
And even when our offense starts with Rondo we have the problem, that only one guy is moving and the other players are screening for him or just stand around. If the defense manages to close out to the designated finisher of our play (Belli most of the time) we struggle to find a solution for it. We will fall back to 1vs1 ball again with less time on the clock or Belli pumpfakes or drives only to leave his feet and throw up a desperation shot or pass (him leaving his feet on every pass drives me crazy..).
It all comes down to trends. I know most of us don't like the way the league is heading nowadays. But at some point you have to admit, that teams with only mediocre basketball talent have a certain amount of success, just by following the trend.
So far these teams didn't manage to win it in the playoffs (when you don't consider the Spurs being one of these teams), but they had more success than the Kings.
It's all about space, ball and player movement, mobility and perimeter D.