[Grades] Grades v. Jazz 3/22/12

What goosed our cook?

  • JT ya gotta hit those damn FTs!!

    Votes: 21 50.0%
  • 2 balls ripped out of Cousins hands in the final minutes

    Votes: 1 2.4%
  • Smart should have stuck with the guys who got us there down the stretch

    Votes: 6 14.3%
  • Smart should have gone back to IT and JT earlier

    Votes: 1 2.4%
  • Confused defensive mistake on the final Jefferson score

    Votes: 7 16.7%
  • Reke. Its always Reke.

    Votes: 6 14.3%

  • Total voters
    42
  • Poll closed .
Favors > Boogie. DMC is a bad offensive player, a really good rebounded and below average defender for a big. He mostly has a negative impact on games. He has great potential but he is a big that shoots around 42%. That can't be ignored.

Were you watching the Sharks game? Is there a duo named Favors and Boogie in the NHL? Because clearly, you're not watching the sport of basketball. Or if you actually are, you're doing it wrong.
 
Were you watching the Sharks game? Is there a duo named Favors and Boogie in the NHL? Because clearly, you're not watching the sport of basketball. Or if you actually are, you're doing it wrong.

Favors and Boogie were actually a 70's duo. They had such hits as:

"Meet You At the Boards"
"Your Love Is So Foul, It's Good"
 
Favors > Boogie. DMC is a bad offensive player, a really good rebounded and below average defender for a big. He mostly has a negative impact on games. He has great potential but he is a big that shoots around 42%. That can't be ignored.

Whatever you're smoking, I want some.
 
Some people really need to understand that coming off the bench is not necessarily a demotion at all. If he plays about the same amount of minutes, but is able to produce much better, it may be the better spot for him. He was nothing short of amazing tonight.


I am one that agrees with you. Starting does not mean much to me. It is much more important who is on the floor at the end of the game as well as minutes played.

McHale and Havlichek came off the bench.
 
If your guys are sooooo good why so few wins? Nobody expects a championship but if Evens is on the cusp of greatness and Boogie is going to be the next Shaq and if Thornton is close to being an all star you would think a .500 record would be a slight under achievement.

Cousins has great potential. Outside of rebounding he doesn't help you win. On many nights he is the reason you lost. That is almost never the case with Favors. He is a net positive almost every time he steps on the floor. Boogie is a net negative more often than not.
 
If your guys are sooooo good why so few wins? Nobody expects a championship but is Evens is on the cusp of greatness and Boogie is going to be the next Shaq and if Thornton is close to being an all star you would think a .500 record would be a slight under achievement.

scaled.php


As for the rest, dude. Seriously, dude.
 

43.4%, if anybody is actually counting.

And a PER of 20.7, compared to Favors' 16.8.

Oh, and Cousins outdoes Favors in ORebs, DRebs, Assists, and Steals (both per-36 and %age). Cousins has a bit higher TO per-36 but a lower TO% (because he has a higher usage rate - Favors actually turns the ball over more often relative to how often he's used on offense). Oh, and Cousins shoots jump shots at 40%, while Favors shoots at 25%. So as of right now, Favors dunks more, and has 0.3 more blocked shots per-36.

But hey, go ahead and dismiss our center who can dribble around your guards in the open court, hit a jump shot, pass, and will probably lead the league in rebounding in short order in favor of your athletic guy who doesn't have a lot of basketball skill yet. Your guy is young, so there's hope for him.
 
Favors > Boogie. DMC is a bad offensive player, a really good rebounded and below average defender for a big. He mostly has a negative impact on games. He has great potential but he is a big that shoots around 42%. That can't be ignored.

favors has amare stoudemire potential. and what exactly has amare accomplished in this league, outside of all star selections that were deeply indebted to steve nash and mike d'antoni? i think favors will have a solid career, but more in that "awww, isn't that nice?" kinda way. demarcus cousins, on the other hand, has the potential to be a once-in-a-decade franchise center in that "holy ****, did he really just do THAT" kinda way. truth be told, i roll the dice on such potential over ANY player in the nba who does not exhibit obvious lebron james-level skill...
 
One stat not mentioned in Salmon's grade blurb was his six assists, one off the lead for the team. He can do that for me any night.
 
A couple of things stuck out last night- I agree about missed FT, sloppy passing on break, and missing layups and giving up more than 15 blocks. Are the Jazz bigs that good? I wish we had big Al. The Kings have faded in the 4th quarter all year. It was great to see the all defensive team collapse a zone on Utah and really mess up their offense. It gave the Kings a chance to win, MT did his magic and the game was won until Cousins got caught between the shooter and big Al. Game over.
 
No. As I mentioned in another thread you do that and you just lost your ROY in a year's time, because there will be any number of teams all too happy to start him out there when he hits free agency.

Now that said, Reke was probably thinking hey look at this, I get to handle the ball without having to fight over it with 3 other guys who want it all the time whuke I'm wrestlin gwith guys 20lbs bigger than I am.
Manu Ginobli
yes, he's a basketball player too.

And a late 20s/early 30s basketball player who eventually moved to the bench after he had already won several champsionships with his team, been an All Star etc. Maybe, MAYBE you could get a long time vet to do that same way -- where he had already been to the mountainntop with you, you were always going to take care of him etc. Young guy with big plans playing for a team that hasn't even sniffed .500 in 5 years? No. You're not going to keep Tyreke Evans on the bench so the likes of John Salmosn and Isaiah Thomas can continue to start. Just doesn't happen that way.
Maybe you should look stuff up before you post stats because your way off. Manu has been coming off the bench the majority of his career.

Championship years.
02-03 Games played 69 started 5. playoffs started 0
04-05 Games 74 started 74, in playoffs played 23 started 15.
06-07 games played 75 started 36. playoffs started 0.

other seasons
05-06 65 games 56 starts
10-11 80 games 79 starts.

the rest are less than half the games. He split starting with Hedo, Barry, Mason and Finely most of his career. Hill and Bogans got the starts in 09-10 Bowen and Parker were the 2 backcourt main guys. I think Manu is was better than all the guys that started over him.

Oh and Manu's production has been consistant since 04-05 with his PER ranging from 21.78 - 24-18. He's at 23.46 this year so he hasn't slowed down at all.
The spirit of the post is still accurate, though: there is an enormous difference in circumstances, that cannot be overlooked. By the time Ginobili got to the NBA, he had already won multiple titles, multiple MVP's, a gold medal at the FIBA Americas tournament, and a silver medal at the FIBA World Championships. Those sort of accomplishments have a way of tempering your outlook regarding the urgency of starting. You know what else makes you less likely to be in a rush to start? Winning an NBA Championship your first time out of the gate.

When your coach asks you to come off the bench for the good of the team, it will help if your team is not losing. I would also venture to guess that, in 2012, "the good of the team" means something different in a gym in Bahia than it does in a gym in Chester. Some people, I think, undersell the values dissonance between US players and international players. If a player on a mediocre-to-bad team feels as though he should be starting, and a GM offers him a fat contract and says, we will start you, and new team is either greater than or equal to the old team, as US player will take that, probably ninety-nine times out of one hundred.

But, Jason Terry comes off the bench! Jason Terry was a starter the first eight years of his career, including the team that got to the Finals in 2006.
But, Lamar Odom comes off the bench! Odom started something like 573 out of the first 577 games of his career, including the team that got to the Finals in 2008.
But, Jamal Crawford comes off the bench! Crawford also started a substantial portion of his first eight years in the league. Crawford has also reached a point in his career where he's realized that most of his best basketball is behind him, and now, he just wants to win. Earlier in his career, wanted to start, and did so.
But, James Harden comes off he bench, and he's never started! True, but as previously stated, it helps when you are not losing. The Thunder are a team with championship aspirations. And, not for nothing but, title contenders or not, the Thunder are going to going to have to deal with this exact problem, in the same amount of time. You expect me to believe that a chance to start is not going to pose a strong temptation to Harden? He was the third overall pick: of course he wants to start! OKC will soon find that it is a question of how much does he want to start.
What about Taj Gibson? Most of the above applies to him as well, add to the fact that he has better players ahead of him in the rotation than any of these other guys.

I could see Evans coming off the bench for the rest of the year, without it adversely affecting our ability to keep him. Much longer than that, and it's a different story. If Evans is still not starting a year from now, and the Kings are not title contenders, I'd say there's better than a ninety precent chance that he's gone. His brothers will talk him into it, if nothing else.
 
A couple of things stuck out last night- I agree about missed FT, sloppy passing on break, and missing layups and giving up more than 15 blocks. Are the Jazz bigs that good? I wish we had big Al. The Kings have faded in the 4th quarter all year. It was great to see the all defensive team collapse a zone on Utah and really mess up their offense. It gave the Kings a chance to win, MT did his magic and the game was won until Cousins got caught between the shooter and big Al. Game over.

The Jazz bigs are very good. There was a good article recently about the Jazz bigs taking the Thunder to the woodshed.
 
Favors > Boogie. DMC is a bad offensive player, a really good rebounded and below average defender for a big. He mostly has a negative impact on games. He has great potential but he is a big that shoots around 42%. That can't be ignored.



Your ability to assess the talent of NBA basketball players is remarkably bad. I doubt you find a single perosn outside the bounds of Utah who would go along with that. Certianly not a single one who knows basketball. Hell, I had the Jazz feed fro last night's game -- evern your own announcers would jsut shake their head at such homerness.
 
Favors can... Jump higher than Boogie? Block more shots?

Other than that, there's nothing that Favors does at a higher level
 
43.4%, if anybody is actually counting.

And a PER of 20.7, compared to Favors' 16.8.

Oh, and Cousins outdoes Favors in ORebs, DRebs, Assists, and Steals (both per-36 and %age). Cousins has a bit higher TO per-36 but a lower TO% (because he has a higher usage rate - Favors actually turns the ball over more often relative to how often he's used on offense). Oh, and Cousins shoots jump shots at 40%, while Favors shoots at 25%. So as of right now, Favors dunks more, and has 0.3 more blocked shots per-36.

But hey, go ahead and dismiss our center who can dribble around your guards in the open court, hit a jump shot, pass, and will probably lead the league in rebounding in short order in favor of your athletic guy who doesn't have a lot of basketball skill yet. Your guy is young, so there's hope for him.

What good is a big that can dribble around? Do you really want your post player taking (not really making) a bunch of jump shots? He has all those skills but they don't help you win. They are things that are risky and ill-advised for your center. I will admit that he is a good rebounder and has great potential. He just is hurting your team more often than he is helping your team. Favors helps his team win more than hurts his team win. They have different roles and have played under vastly different circumstances but to pick Favors over Boogie isn't a stretch like you guys make it out to be.
 
Isn't Npliam a Jazz fan? Of course he is going to have bias in favor of the Favors.

I agree that 43% is horrible for a post player. Favors is a very efficient finisher at the basket but he only takes 6 and half attempt per game. Even Tyreke has passed Cousins up over these last couple games but his percentage is deflated by him not being able to constantly finish off of his high offensive rebounding rate. As of now Favors is more of a player used for his defensive fundamentals/intanglibes and is definitely more of a project at this point. While Cousins is more comfortable creating offense for himself (and has shown flashes for creating for others) than Favors.

It's clear though that when Cousins goes out of games this Kings team typically stuggles and I feel that can't say the same for Favors for either the Jazz or if he were on the Kings.
 
Last edited:
What good is a big that can dribble around? Do you really want your post player taking (not really making) a bunch of jump shots? He has all those skills but they don't help you win. They are things that are risky and ill-advised for your center. I will admit that he is a good rebounder and has great potential. He just is hurting your team more often than he is helping your team. Favors helps his team win more than hurts his team win. They have different roles and have played under vastly different circumstances but to pick Favors over Boogie isn't a stretch like you guys make it out to be.

you, sir, threaten to steal the mantle of Most Idiotic Poster At Kingsfans.com from several individuals who have spent years earning it...

128877791372575804.jpg
 
What good is a big that can dribble around?

Last night it was worth (at least) 2 points. He has pretty decent handles in the half-court as well, so he can get to the rim under circumstances when Favors probably could not. Hard to say that's good for nothing.

Do you really want your post player taking (not really making) a bunch of jump shots?

40% on jump shots is not exactly "not really making" them. And yes, the more weapons an offensive player has, the better. Favors is less versatile offensively, so the defense can focus on his strengths easier. Would you rather have the opposing defense focus on taking away your post player's one strength, or be forced to choose to defend one option at the expense of allowing another?
 
One stat not mentioned in Salmon's grade blurb was his six assists, one off the lead for the team. He can do that for me any night.
Now, since I first posted, Salmon's grade has been dropped from a C to a C-. What's this? Also, I admit I haven't read all of the analysis with the grades but I can see the general tenor of the grades and wonder if they all need to be upped at least a slot. Our guys played a good team game despite missed free throws, defensive burps, missed shots, missed layups, etc. Those mistakes were made, in my view, in course of playing a very good game.
 
What good is a big that can dribble around? Do you really want your post player taking (not really making) a bunch of jump shots? He has all those skills but they don't help you win. They are things that are risky and ill-advised for your center. I will admit that he is a good rebounder and has great potential. He just is hurting your team more often than he is helping your team. Favors helps his team win more than hurts his team win. They have different roles and have played under vastly different circumstances but to pick Favors over Boogie isn't a stretch like you guys make it out to be.

I don't know how many times you've been wrong about stats, have been corrected, and yet here we are again. Seriously, if you're going to make blanket statements, at least show you've done a little research and have a little understanding of the league.

So apparently Cuz is "not really making" jumpers. Funny, because he's 40% from 16-23 ft. That is exceptional for a center, although you obviously don't know that.

I'm just going to list a few names of players shooting below 40% from that same range, guys who you obviously don't want shooting them given your statement on Cuz.

Kevin Love 32%
Rudy Gay 31%
Lebron James 39%
Monta Ellis 38%
Blake Griffin 32%
Derrick Rose 39%
Carmelo Anthony 31%

Demarcus Cousins 40%
Kobe Bryant 40%

and for fun, Jimmer Fredette 34%. So I've seen you campaigning for Jimmer to shoot more, yet Cuz has the better midrange game, and he shouldn't shoot? That's called a conflict of interest devoid of logic.

Looks like you can leave now, as you have a number of forums to visit to tell everyone guys like Kobe, Melo, and Lebron shouldn't be shooting jumpers.
 
Last edited:
If your guys are sooooo good why so few wins? Nobody expects a championship but if Evens is on the cusp of greatness and Boogie is going to be the next Shaq and if Thornton is close to being an all star you would think a .500 record would be a slight under achievement.

Cousins has great potential. Outside of rebounding he doesn't help you win. On many nights he is the reason you lost. That is almost never the case with Favors. He is a net positive almost every time he steps on the floor. Boogie is a net negative more often than not.
Aren't the Kings players your guys? Am I missing something. New on the block?

Also it seems to me that some people don't realize that all the good players in the league can't play for the Kings. Let's all go back and start all over again, if that's OK with hou all.
 
Back
Top