RJ Barret is reclassifying into the 2018 class which is good news for the Kings.
Wouldn't that mean that he would appear in the 2019 draft, when we don't have a pick?
RJ Barret is reclassifying into the 2018 class which is good news for the Kings.
Yep. Definitely not good for the Kings. It's been rumored he would make that move for a while now though, well before rumblings of Bagley reclassing up.Wouldn't that mean that he would appear in the 2019 draft, when we don't have a pick?
Robinson needs to have a sit down with Stansbury and settle this. I realize that's hard to do right now with Stansbury in Costa Rica, but I think he needs to bite the bullet and honor his commitment. Hopefully that will happen and we'll get to see the kid play. We all need to remember that he is indeed a kid.
Wouldn't that mean that he would appear in the 2019 draft, when we don't have a pick?
You should probably add Syracuse to that list as well.
This story stinks of adults making promises they couldn't fulfill and giving misleading advice, which is the dirty underbelly of college hoops IMO. For now WKU and Stansbury will look holier than thou but I think time will reveal their hands are dirty, I mean they hired his godfather in 2016.... there's no doubt that played a major part of his recruitment...
When his godfather, Shammond Williams, resigned earlier this year it seemed this type of drama would soon follow, and now it has. If he's forced to sit out a year to transfer that sucks but at least he'll get to do what he wants.
This would play out poorly for the Kings timeline, no doubt, so so strictly as a Kings fan I hope this get resolved ASAP.
Hopefully a story like this serves as cautionary tales for future top recruits. Sadly, that might be the best thing that happens from this situation.
you can also add Gonzaga to that list
you can also add Gonzaga to that list
Just for the record; I don't subscribe to this typecasting/profiling..I think those molds are too easily shattered to hold any real weight, there's always outliers... Perhaps it's naive, but the longer I''ve watched the more i'm sure that keeping things on case-by-case basis is key.
I just can't fathom how it's fair to judge Rui Hachimura who came from halfway across the world to play at Gonzaga based on what Adam Morrison did in the pro's 10 years ago. It doesn't add up to me.History speaks for itself. I don't need to show you a list of players out of these programs who have either busted or been fringe role-players in the league and on occasion you get the one all-star out of the crop but the probability of that happening, at least out of those programs I've mentioned, aren't in their favor.
I just can't fathom how it's fair to judge Rui Hachimura who came from halfway across the world to play at Gonzaga based on what Adam Morrison did in the pro's 10 years ago. It doesn't add up to me.
I don't always blame the player for being a bust too. Often times I think it's on the team and their scouting staff / F.O. for over-valuing players and pulling the trigger on them too early in the draft. A recent example of this would be Trey Burke and Utah, now I'm not saying he's absolved or couldn't have done things better, I'd argue though that he was never equipped to fufill the expectations of where he was drafted. I'm sure being a Kings fan you've seen many of these types draftd in the first underperform, so I do understand how it's easy to get gun-shy. Thomas Robinson over Harrison Barnes. Lillard and Drummond was insane, I still can't figure that one other then by saying the F/O had visions of sugarplums dancing in their heads.
Morrison isn't the only reason I've used Gonzaga as an example. Looking at some of the players as far back as a decade ago to come out of Gonzaga; Austin Daye, Robert Sacre, Kelly Olynyk, Ronny Turiaf & Dan Dickau just to name a few because I don't want to go too far back. The jury is still out on Sabonis, Collins & Williams-Goss but all in all, if I were looking for top tier picks, I'd steer clear from that Gonzaga program.
Kelly Olynyk's draft position has been justified IMO. I still think at-best these comparisons are an unclean correlation, I don't see how some knucklehead like Josh Selby should factor into an opinion on a blue-chip prospect such as Joel Embiid, Andrew Wiggins or Josh Jackson's outlook, who clearly could've played anywhere and been top-5 selections...
I'm not trying to convince you though, just wanted to make a point that I try to be as unbiased as possible.
I will say that I believe there's a flipside of the equation which i'd also be weary of too; Marquis Teague and Daniel Orton were over-drafted and given far too much benefit of the doubt because of their ties to the successful UK program, Marquis also rode the coat-tails of a National Championship squad to the first rd.. As someone who watched both Teague brothers closely in college it was quite clear that Marquis was no where near Jeff's potential, athleticism or anything for that matter..
all the HS recruiting services took a major L with Marquis too. They used to hype him like he was gonna be better than Jeff. Marquis was laying the ball up on wide-open fast breaks and Jeff was throwing down viscious jams in halfcourt offense. If they weren't brothers no one would've ever thought to compare the two.Watching Teague & Orton at UK, I wasn't convinced they would make good pros. Nothing they did really stood out to me that can translate.
Morrison isn't the only reason I've used Gonzaga as an example. Looking at some of the players as far back as a decade ago to come out of Gonzaga; Austin Daye, Robert Sacre, Kelly Olynyk, Ronny Turiaf & Dan Dickau just to name a few because I don't want to go too far back. The jury is still out on Sabonis, Collins & Williams-Goss but all in all, if I were looking for top tier picks, I'd steer clear from that Gonzaga program.
Doncic's impressive debut for his National Team. 14pts 4asts 6rebs in 13 minutes!
I think he's a PG at the next level. Of course he's not going to defend PGs, but he's going to be running an NBA offense. I worry about his fit with Fox. Fox is a ball dominant scoring PG who can't space the floor. Can't see the two co-existing together if you're asking for maximum effectiveness. Doncic has been perfectly fine playing with Goran Dragic for his NT, but Dragic can actually play off-ball and space the floor.
The position he guards will come down to his official measurements. This year, Real Madrid had him listed roughly at 6'5 w/o shoes. Euroleague has him at 6'6 w/o shoes. Guessing with a 220lb frame. If he can grow to at least 6'7 w/o shoes and adds more bulk, I think he'll be able to guard SF even without a positive wingspan.I think he'd fit well with Fox. Fox needs the ball to be effective but he doesn't need to dominate the shot clock to do so. I feel like he can get the ball to Doncic the ball in an advantageous position, and quickly, and thats all Luka needs to have the defense at his mercy.
My opinion is Doncic's primary NBA position is SG, who can also play SF and some point though.. Of all the what position does he play ?'s to watch in this class Doncic is #1 though IMO.
One thing I'm fearing with Porter Jr in terms of being a SF is that he's not quick enough. Jayson Tatum doesn't have good quickness, but he makes up for it with his in-between mid range game. Those weird post up fadeaways exploit smaller wings. If Porter Jr doesn't have that quickness, I'm not seeing the same mid-range threat from Porter Jr. However, the great thing about him is that he can easily play PF if SF doesn't workout. I don't see any real problems at all with him being a NBA PF once he bulks. Only slight problem I see is that we'll need a shotblocking C to make up for rim protection.My buddy who's 6'7" met Michael Porter Jr last week and swears he's a legit 6'10 and will be a PF. I'm still gonna say his position is SF/PF though, even though there's many huge mismatch type of players at SF, I think thats where he'll fit best. As a smallball PF though as I've mentioned before, you can really spread the floor.
One thing I'm fearing with Porter Jr in terms of being a SF is that he's not quick enough. Jayson Tatum doesn't have good quickness, but he makes up for it with his in-between mid range game. Those weird post up fadeaways exploit smaller wings. If Porter Jr doesn't have that quickness, I'm not seeing the same mid-range threat from Porter Jr. However, the great thing about him is that he can easily play PF if SF doesn't workout. I don't see any real problems at all with him being a NBA PF once he bulks. Only slight problem I see is that we'll need a shotblocking C to make up for rim protection.