The problem with fans is that they judge the coaches on win and loss records and not on their actual coaching. People forget that Rivers was a bee's proverbial from getting fired before Ainge got him the big 3 and all of a sudden he is one of the best.
I never considered Mike Brown to be a good coach despite his great win-loss percentage. His teams won because he had arguably the best player in the league in James. Good coaches need to be looked at in the way they coach and how they get the best out of their team.
A young team like the Kings needs a coach who knows when to take control and call out plays and when to let them play through it. A coach that will give this young team some structure both offensive and defensive. We have no structure. Its a free-styling at both ends. I have said many times last year that Westphal's option should not have been picked up and we should go after Adelman. Just imagine what sort of offensive sets he could implement with this group of players?! He would utilise his best passers in Cousins and Hayes, he would utilise Cousins' post game. He would utilise Tyreke's driving ability. He would utilise Thornton's shooting and driving ability. He would make this team run its offence like a well oiled machine.
Of course that was never going to happen because a) our owners would never get Adelman back since they burnt their bridges there, b) after Mussleman, Theus and Kenny Who, Westphal looks like Phil Jackson, and c) probably most importantly as Glenn pointed out, they can't afford to pay a great coach the market price....they are broke! They can't afford to pay a great coach $5-10 million per seasons when they can have Westphal for 3 years at some $5 million in total.
We have gone on the cheap this FA period as well. In order for us to get a real coach, the Maloofs either have to get super rich super fast, or we need new owners that are willing to spend to build a genuine winner.
After watching Westphal's comments after the Chicago game, I am stunned how he has lasted this long. Players going for offensive rebounds when they had no business to do so?! WTF?!?! Then why go out and recruit players that excel at offensive rebounds!?![]()
Yeah, I guess you're right - my wording, as general and encompassing as it was for the sake of brevity, did specify that the Kings chose Theus over Van Gundy. I should have added "ending up choosing" or something, though that likely wouldn't have been specific enough to survive precise reading analysis, either.
Congratulations - you win the internet.
I wonder how many championships Phil Jackson would have had it not been for Kobe and MJ?
It's funny you list the coaches as successful. All three teams have three if the best players to get drafted in recent years and the one
Unsuccessful coach is the one that lost its super star. I am no knocking the coaches but they get a lot of credit when most cases it's the players. Put doc rivers with Toronto and I bet he isn't considered one of the best.
Great! Do I get to kick you off?
I can't believe it. I just watched the first quarter of the 1993 NBA Finals on youtube. The Suns played EXACTLY how the Kings do. One on one ball, lots of turnovers. They were down 34-20 at the end of the first. Should have never hired Westphal...
But Westphal didn't have a beard in 1993. Hah!!!! Sorry, you lose that round.I can't believe it. I just watched the first quarter of the 1993 NBA Finals on youtube. The Suns played EXACTLY how the Kings do. One on one ball, lots of turnovers. They were down 34-20 at the end of the first. Should have never hired Westphal...
I can't believe it. I just watched the first quarter of the 1993 NBA Finals on youtube. The Suns played EXACTLY how the Kings do. One on one ball, lots of turnovers. They were down 34-20 at the end of the first. Should have never hired Westphal...
No.Great! Do I get to kick you off?
What got to me more than anything was the gambling on defense after the Bulls got the rebound. Trying to steal the ball after the rebound or on the first outlet pass is just lazy. You cannot turn around and catch up fast enough to help your team defend the break. If you want to stop a fast breaking team, try having 5 guys back on defense every time and forget the high risk stuff.
Anyone catch this from Tyreke? "Everybody keeps blaming the coach, about the plays, the plays not good but, hey it be like that sometime. You’ve just got to play." If I'm reading that correctly, maybe even the players are blaming the coach.
Tyreke seems to have the mental capacity of a 10 year old. "The plays not good, but, hey it be like that sometime. You've just got to play".
Seems to me he's okay with a losing strategy.
Tyreke seems to have the mental capacity of a 10 year old. "The plays not good, but, hey it be like that sometime. You've just got to play".
Seems to me he's okay with a losing strategy.
No.
It seems he's pissed, doesn't trust the coaching staff, or the system, nor should he, and he's giving extremely limited responses instead of calling out the coach publicly right after a game.
Kobe responds like this sometimes too. Does he have the mental capacity of a 10 yr old as well?
You really seem to struggle figuring out what is going on right now.
But what else should I expect from you. You think he doesn't even want to improve as a player, well, not until you saw a tweet about him practicing ft's.
Yup. You got me. Fantastic ad hominem. I definitely don't think he wants to improve as a player until I saw the tweet about him practicing FT.
No, he may want to, but he hasn't been improving.
And you can't really put Kobe and Evans on the same tier right now. I haven't seen anything that puts them on remotely the same level.
Yup. You got me. Fantastic ad hominem. I definitely don't think he wants to improve as a player until I saw the tweet about him practicing FT.
No, he may want to, but he hasn't been improving.
And you can't really put Kobe and Evans on the same tier right now. I haven't seen anything that puts them on remotely the same level.
Ad hominem?
I called you out yesterday with a lengthy post regarding your stance on Reke not wanting to improve and the tweet, yet you didn't respond. You had your chance to respond, and didn't.
Yeah, you said Reke doesn't want to improve, and him practicing ft's "gave you hope". Yep, apparently if it wasn't tweeted, you think he isn't practicing. That's incredibly dumb. And no, you didn't refute it either.
Who put Kobe and Reke in the same tier? Are you really that stupid? Did you really think that's what I said? Did you really think I wasn't referring to how Kobe has handled the press after a bad loss without bashing his coach or teammates? Are you so incredibly new to pro sports you haven't seen how some players respond after a tough loss, and they keep it nice and short so they don't say something they'll regret?
Wah, wah wah. Chill out, breh. Didn't even see your other post. I'll go take a look, and respond in my free time.
You didn't miss it. You conveniently skipped right over it, and posted twice right after it.
Wah, wah, wah. Breh? Are you 12? I'm not your breh. You're now borderline trolling.
You didn't miss it. You conveniently skipped right over it, and posted twice right after it.
Wah, wah, wah. Breh? Are you 12? I'm not your breh. You're now borderline trolling.