Seems to me that Kawhi Leonard might be a good pick. He is a lock down type defender, very hard nosed, very quick, and has worked on his mid-range jumper all spring. He can be. 10-10 or 15-15 player in the NBA. An all-around type SF who can play PF. I'm cautious on the high scoring type SF's out there who seem to be too one dimensional.
Its just the team doesn't need any rebounding help, which is a big part of what he brings. But it opens up the interesting possibility of replacing Dally with a stretch 4.
Stretch 4s = garbage 4s.
Bad tradeoff.
Unless they're named Dirk. Tweener stretch 4s on the other hand...
Dirk is a unique entity. His very uniqueness only emphasizes the argument. What's the next tier? Antawn Jamison and Al Harrington? Garbage.
Stretch 4s = garbage 4s.
Bad tradeoff.
Define "stretch 4".
Seriously, thank god we got these two studs the last two drafts and are not(IMO) dependent on finding a star in this draft.
That is all.
I don't entirely disagree with you here. The fate of the Kings' next 5-10 years is tied in to how good DMC and Reke will end up becoming. If they're both all-stars, we could have an annual 50 win team. If they're both just above average, hello to 35-40 wins annually.
Well, I think Jamison helped create the definition. Jeff Green would be an example. A player thats just a little too undersized both height wise and strength wise to be considered a PF on a permanent basis, and just a little too slow, and lacks a good enough outside game to be considered a SF on a permanent basis. So basicly its a player that has skills, but just doesn't have a true position due to some of the reasons I listed.
Sort of the same way the term combo guard was created. These guys have always been there, we just never labeled them before.
Lamar Odom.
Well, I think Jamison helped create the definition. Jeff Green would be an example. A player thats just a little too undersized both height wise and strength wise to be considered a PF on a permanent basis, and just a little too slow, and lacks a good enough outside game to be considered a SF on a permanent basis. So basicly its a player that has skills, but just doesn't have a true position due to some of the reasons I listed.
Sort of the same way the term combo guard was created. These guys have always been there, we just never labeled them before.
I always took the term literally - a power forward who could shoot outside and therefore stretch the floor. I could think of Nowitsky as a stretch 4 because he obviously stetches it more than any other forward in the league with his outside shooting. I didn't really think in terms of the player not having a postion, which tends to be viewed negatively.