this is exactly what i want to do. but who would trade expirings and picks for bibby or miller?trade Brad Miller and Bibby for cap-space and picks.
ImAKing said:this is exactly what i want to do. but who would take bibby or miller for expirings and picks?
Teams who are trying to win now...
Chicago/Indiana...etc..etc.
Vlad4GM said:i think we should spend on young players with potential, but signing debilitating contracts to unknowns is not a smart move.
darko for the MLE? yes. darko for nene money? hell no. i think we should spend on young players with potential, but signing debilitating contracts to unknowns is not a smart move.
There is a happy medium between MLE and Nene money IMO. Nobody will give Darko Nene type money.
Vlade4GM said:i still don't think spending more than 6 million a year on an unknown is a smart move.
IMHO, Darko will probably get 30-40M type contract which is good enough. if its gonna be 60M i still want him. we're paying guys like Kenny Thomas big bucks while he doesn't produce crapola.
and we're whineing about giving our $$$ to our biggest need which is shot-blocking and defense?
How do you view Darko when you consider him a unknown? does making our front-court better make things unknown? i'm not really sure why you view Darko as a unknown when he will bring what we lack.
KT's deal is is only 50m over 7 years. Just as a point of reference. 60 million for Darko based on anything he's show so far is absolutely nuts.IMHO, Darko will probably get 30-40M type contract which is good enough. if its gonna be 60M i still want him. we're paying guys like Kenny Thomas big bucks while he doesn't produce crapola.
and we're whineing about giving our $$$ to our biggest need which is shot-blocking and defense?
pdxKingsFan said:KT's deal is is only 50m over 7 years. Just as a point of reference. 60 million for Darko based on anything he's show so far is absolutely nuts.
How does this even count as a valid arguement?
Darko brings shot-blocking which is something we lack big time in the front-court and so is defense. based on anything hes shown? how many times have you been Darko play?
Vlade4GM said:just because he can block shots doesn't make him worth 8-10 million a year
Because you're advocating spending almost 1/5th of the salary cap on a guy who in his 4th year is still barely averaging 20 minutes a game and who's stats over the last 2 years compare to Shawn Bradleys (minus 2 of Shawn's blocks per game)?How does this even count as a valid arguement?
How many threads does this guy need?
I thought VF had a little pow wow with him already about this.Joker? Way too many.
He also has a solid mid-range game, and brings a huge asset to this team... how is he not worth the money?
sometimes you have to spend to win this is no different.
Ben Wallace gets payed 80M for basically just rebounding and blocking shots and hes already starting to slow down. Darko is still young and has enough time to develop other tools to his game.