If we find a way to aquire at least 2 of these players I will be happy...
Ty Lawson
Tyreke Evans
Dejuan Blair
Gerald Henderson
Jeff Teague
Terrence Williams
Jrue Holiday
Chase Budinger
Brandon Jennings
His shot selection was more than a problem -- he looks to be an idiot thus far. Not idiot savant. Just idiot. Schoolyard overdribbling showoff type with no feel about the how or when of anything. And that comes from somebody who thinks that if all else fails, we should probably take him #4. If we do though I have major reservations about his brains, dedication, and focus. He has looked like a guy playing for oohs rather than wins. And bringing him back stateside so he can collect up the standard posse of hangers on telling him how great he is etc. etc. seems like a dubious path to reform and improvement.
To be clear, I think he has great raw talent, and that might make the pick worth it -- could really blossom and be a steal. But everything I have seen so far looks like he is a long way from being any sort of saavy floor general. And the shooting is part of that -- its out of rhythm, ill timed, ill considered. He's just not a very smart bball player right now. What's Mo Cheeks doing now? Or Terry Porter? Would love to bring in a saavy former PG mentor for a guy like Jennings.
Not arguing with you, but just curious as to why you say that.
He's likely going to be the best PG on the board at our pick, considering that position is the path of least resistence for us, that's where they'll probably go. Personally I like Jennings and he's not a bad consollation prize, but well...this just sucks too much to find stupid silver linings.
Because he can't shoot, can't finish around the rim, and isn't a good defender.
I have not seen Petrie draft a guard who can't shoot in the 1st rd, except for Tariq (#11 in 1997), but Tariq can really defend and he's a SG plus he was the BPA in a weak draft so I think he's the exception who proves the rule.
For PGs, GP has a preference for those who can shoot. As soon as GP sees Jennings airballing jumpshots left and right, that'll be the end of Jenning in GP's mind. I'm exaggerating a little bit but not that much. I have seen practice video of Jennings airballing consecutive mid range jumpshots with no one around him.
I know there'll be people who throws out Rondo and Tony Parker. The problem is, Rondo and Parker are great finishers. Jennings is a clear-path finisher; meaning he can't finish unless he has a clear path to the basket. It's no accident he shot under 40% in a league with absolutely no one who can stay in front of him and very few shotblockers to contest him.
Team defense in Europe is usually good. And believe it or not, there are shotblockers over here! Shock horror
As well as that, there is far more contact on the perimeter in Europe. In the NBA it's a foul to breathe on someone. That said, shooting is a weakness for Jennings, but I still like him at 4.
I'm worried about Thabeet. I like his shotblocking and athleticism, but he's rail thin and awfully weak. He's going to get bullied every night by NBA centers and he hasn't shown that he can actually defend. Just block shots.
I'd rather take Jennings or Evans at this point.
Team defense in Europe is usually good. And believe it or not, there are shotblockers over here! Shock horror
As well as that, there is far more contact on the perimeter in Europe. In the NBA it's a foul to breathe on someone. That said, shooting is a weakness for Jennings, but I still like him at 4.
I'm worried about Thabeet. I like his shotblocking and athleticism, but he's rail thin and awfully weak. He's going to get bullied every night by NBA centers and he hasn't shown that he can actually defend. Just block shots.
I'd rather take Jennings or Evans at this point.
His shot selection was more than a problem -- he looks to be an idiot thus far. Not idiot savant. Just idiot. Schoolyard overdribbling showoff type with no feel about the how or when of anything. And that comes from somebody who thinks that if all else fails, we should probably take him #4. If we do though I have major reservations about his brains, dedication, and focus. He has looked like a guy playing for oohs rather than wins. And bringing him back stateside so he can collect up the standard posse of hangers on telling him how great he is etc. etc. seems like a dubious path to reform and improvement.
To be clear, I think he has great raw talent, and that might make the pick worth it -- could really blossom and be a steal. But everything I have seen so far looks like he is a long way from being any sort of saavy floor general. And the shooting is part of that -- its out of rhythm, ill timed, ill considered. He's just not a very smart bball player right now. What's Mo Cheeks doing now? Or Terry Porter? Would love to bring in a saavy former PG mentor for a guy like Jennings.
And in Europe there isn't defensive 3 second violation, so it's more difficult to finish at the basket.Team defense in Europe is usually good. And believe it or not, there are shotblockers over here! Shock horror
As well as that, there is far more contact on the perimeter in Europe. In the NBA it's a foul to breathe on someone. That said, shooting is a weakness for Jennings, but I still like him at 4.
What leads you to say that? We don't exactly have much of a track record to judge him on when it comes to lottery picks this high. 7th is the highest he has been, and in that case he wasn't afraid to go after a guy with significantly more character questions in J-Will.Everything we know about Petrie is that he doesn't gamble. He always goes for the safest pick.
What's Mo Cheeks doing now? Or Terry Porter? Would love to bring in a saavy former PG mentor for a guy like Jennings.
Everything we know about Petrie is that he doesn't gamble. He always goes for the safest pick. His most risky pick was Jason Williams. He doesn't gamble especially with early picks. He will go for a proven player. Someone who has the runs on the board. So you won't see him swinging for a home run and picking Jennings. He will go for a safe pick. Someone like Jonny Flynn. Someone with not much upside but who can be a solid contributor straight away.
Sadly he will not be able to contribute for a few years. By which time he'll become a FA and sign elsewhere. Kinda like GW
I'm not sold on either of these guys as a head coach, but since both have their reputations in shambles would they accept a lead assistant position to an Eddie Jordan or Paul Westphaul?