Telemachus
Starter
Jeff Van Gundy says Cousins shouldn't be an All-Star
Harsh words for the best center in the game.
This would mean only 4 from the East would get all stars.
Jeff Van Gundy says Cousins shouldn't be an All-Star
Harsh words for the best center in the game.
Jeff Van Gundy says Cousins shouldn't be an All-Star
Harsh words for the best center in the game.
Interesting that he's got Dirk over LeeLowe added him to his All-Star picks, although you would barely know it since he mostly used the writeup to whine about him. Appears to just eat him up to say anything nice about Cousins:
http://grantland.com/features/our-nba-all-star-team/
Interesting that he's got Dirk over Lee
Shaq the only one on the TNT crew that put Cousins on his list of reserves. the other guys had players like David Lee, Tim Duncan, Diandre Jordan, Goran Dragic instead of Cuz. shameful
Huh, so West starters are: Curry, Bryant, Durant, Griffin, and Love. Kobe being voted in opens an injury spot, I guess, and coaches might leave Paul out if he's not ready/since he's been injured. Since Howard wasn't voted in to start, is he a lock to get a nod from the coaches?
Still think its too radical an idea for most coaches to take Cousins and not Howard, but at least he's got a little stink on him.
If anyone does deserve it out of those guys over Cuz it's Dragic he's the best player on a team with way less talent and he's helped carry them to a playoff spot, Dragic while not a better player he's had as big if not bigger impact than Cousins on a lesser team. DeAndre Jordan is a joke, Duncan is not really what he was, Lee with his recent play could make a light case.Shaq the only one on the TNT crew that put Cousins on his list of reserves. the other guys had players like David Lee, Tim Duncan, Diandre Jordan, Goran Dragic instead of Cuz. shameful
Chris Broussard @Chris_Broussard1h
West reserves: JHarden, TParker, TDuncan, DLillard, KLove, Blake Griffin, Dirk
Yeah I'm biased, but Boogie is deserving over Griffin without a doubt and one of Duncan or Dirk. Can't honor both old-timers while ignoring the historical stats Boogie is putting up. Pisses me off.
As a positive though, I'll turn around and say this will motivate Cuz even more and he'll come back next year putting up 26/12 and will be on a mission to destroy every coach he feels passed him up.
Hmmm, you might be right.Are those just Broussard's predictions? I didn't think they named the reserves until later.
Bad predictions. Love and griffin are starting.Are those just Broussard's predictions? I didn't think they named the reserves until later.
Chris Broussard @Chris_Broussard1h
West reserves: JHarden, TParker, TDuncan, DLillard, KLove, Blake Griffin, Dirk
Yeah I'm biased, but Boogie is deserving over Griffin without a doubt and one of Duncan or Dirk. Can't honor both old-timers while ignoring the historical stats Boogie is putting up. Pisses me off. Mitch got elected multiple times when playing for pretty poor teams here.
As a positive though, I'll turn around and say this will motivate Cuz even more and he'll come back next year putting up 26/12 and will be on a mission to destroy every coach he feels passed him up.
Deleting my post then not to cause confusion.
Oops.
5. Name a player who might not make the All-Star team, but should.
Doolittle: Isaiah Thomas. You don't hear much about him, but he's a dynamic offensive player. He's averaging 21 points and seven assists since he became a starter, and the Thomas-Cousins-Gay trio has become one of the most effective in the league.
Found this little tidbit in ESPN's 5 on 5 all star discussion:
http://espn.go.com/nba/story/_/page/5-on-5-140124/examining-all-star-starters
I'm hoping the reason he said Thomas and not Cousins is because he believes Cousins WILL make the team.
It's tempting to say Anthony Davis or DeMarcus Cousins should be there instead of Blake Griffin, but they all have comparable bottom-line value and the Clippers are much better than the Pelicans or Kings.
I think it is clear from any perspective (beyond popularity) that Cousins is an All-Star.
However, I think it is worrisome that most people are so casual to dismiss the difference between putting up numbers on a good contending team versus putting them up for a bad team. It is not the same thing. Players on winning teams are given a benefit of the doubt because in most cases it is much more difficult playing in that type of environment.
Possibly, but every team has some talent. It would be hard to find a team that was comfortable with consistent triple-teams. Plus, must good teams have players that are good, thus need less help on defense.Or players on a losing team with little talent around them can get double and triple teamed.
That would likely be true for lower quality teams without star players.,Possibly, but every team has some talent. It would be hard to find a team that was comfortable with consistent triple-teams. Plus, must good teams have players that are good, thus need less help on defense.
It would be interesting to see a double-team rate for all the teams in the league. I would not be surprised to find that lower quality teams faced LESS double-teams than good teams.