Apparently having a contrary opinion makes my posting garbage; thanks for pointing that out.Beno is not garbage. Your post is garbage. Some of his TOs have been rather atrocious, granted, but these are correctable mistakes.
Surround him with better talent, put more ballhandlers on the court, esp. Cisco @ 30-35 minutes a game, bring back K-Mart, and with another 10-20 games under his belt with the current unit, these TO woes will take care of themselves.
He's not a 5:1 assist to TO guy like a CP3, but he's not near as bad as we have seen.
Apparently having a contrary opinion makes my posting garbage; thanks for pointing that out.
Your points would be valid if Beno was a fresh pickup and not used to running this team's offense, but he's been our starting guard for some time now. He played 65 games last season, averaging 4.3 assists to 2.3 turnovers last season (second to last in the league among all qualified PGs, ahead of only Jarrett Jack).
These are bad numbers, and they haven't improved. I put emphasis on a playmaking statistic like AST/TO ratio because that's the kind of player this team needs right now: A qualified distributor who can minimize turnovers, one of our team's weaknesses. Beno is offensively talented, but we don't need scoring from his position as much as we need positive leadership and playmaking.
Whatever, though. Feel free to post more about how our team needs more talent for him to be successful (despite how PGs like Earl Watson on terrible teams like OKC and Memphis earn better marks), or that he needs a stable lineup (despite how he had a relatively stable, more talented lineup last year and produced similar numbers).
He just isn't what the team needs from our starting PG.
Nash also produces a lot more assists, which is why the AST/TO ratio is used.I don't want to get in between you two, so I'll say you both made valid points. Todays Bee had a similar topic, and Reggie was quoted as saying that 80 percent of the offense goes thru Miller or Hawes at the hi post. And I believe it said the Steve Nash has a hire turnover per game aver. than Beno.
So, lets agree that our PG can't get as many assists as some of the other top PG"s because we run the HI Post Offense. And, Beno needs to cut back on some of his turnovers caused by lack of concentration.
Now if you really want to start a discussion, lets talk defense.
Nash also produces a lot more assists, which is why the AST/TO ratio is used.
Nash also produces a lot more assists, which is why the AST/TO ratio is used.
Beno's lack of assists is understandable because of the type of offense we run, but there really isn't any excuse for how often he turns the ball over. Here's the article.
OK Beno haters. vs Lakers in LA: 17 pts, 7 ast and only 1 TO!!!!!!!!!!
Sounds like really great PG stats. His game was B+ maybe even A- as well.
...and just like Kings home court victory over Lakers - Beno outplayed Fisher AGAIN on both ends of the court. Fisher tonight: 11 pts, 3 ast.
well, and he kicked the ball to Odumb and missed to FT when it really mattered. I would have wanted Fischer tonight.Um, not a particular Beno basher, but proudly announcing your man has outplayed Derek Fisher is...well, a sign that he needs something more to be proud of.![]()
OK, you are a hater, we got that...but to come out after a night when he had one, ONE, 1 TO is...how to put it gently...STUPID!well, and he kicked the ball to Odumb and missed to FT when it really mattered. I would have wanted Fischer tonight.