B Friedman - NBA.com on Kings

kennadog

Dog On It!
http://www.nba.com/features/moves_2005_sac.html

Geoff Petrie targets castoffs to revamp Sacramento

Western Gunslinger By Brad Friedman

Geoff Petrie doesn't rebuild the Kings. Sacramento's president of basketball operations simply reloads.

Petrie already has found replacements for Chris Webber and Doug Christie, who helped compose the foundation of a Sacramento team that was considered by some a Finals contender at the beginning of last year.

In the same manner he acquired Webber in 1998 -- when off-the-court turmoil fueled the Wizards' desire to part ways with their star -- Petrie landed Shareef Abdur-Rahim and Bonzi Wells by targeting players more readily available than peers of a similar talent level.

In Abdur-Rahim's case, it was reportedly a suspect knee that made the former Olympian obtainable. The New Jersey Nets originally acquired him in a sign-and-trade with Portland Aug. 2 but rescinded the deal a week later because of concerns relating to his long-term health.

During the July recruiting process, the Kings fought hard to agree to terms with Abdur-Rahim on the free agent market, so when the Nets unexpectedly backed out, the 28-year-old signed three days later with Sacramento.

"Things happened in an unpredictable manner regarding the New Jersey situation," said Abdur-Rahim, who is reunited with former Grizzlies teammate Mike Bibby. "Even when I made the decision to commit to New Jersey, it was between coming here or going there. (If) Sacramento moved on and wouldn’t have become an opportunity, I would’ve been left scrambling to go anywhere, so more than anything I’m thankful that this situation was still here for me."

Abdur-Rahim disputes the notion that there's anything wrong with his knee.

"The only thing I can tell you is that I’m healthy," he said. "I guess they (Nets) did their physical and some something that made them uncomfortable. I’ve never missed games or practices because of my knees so like I said, their concerns came out of the blue to me. As far as what went on in New Jersey, my focus, my heart and my attention is here. I’m ready to move forward and be apart of this team.”

Wells was also an easier pickup because of a "damaged goods" label that diminished his market value. Considered a blossoming All-Star with the Portland Trail Blazers several years ago when he averaged 17.0 points per game, Wells' reputation took a hit after reports of him being a disruptive influence on team chemistry surfaced.

Portland eventually dealt him to Memphis, which decided this summer it was time to end Wells' two-year stay. The Kings jumped at the chance to land the 6-5 shooting guard, giving up a pair of reserves in Bobby Jackson and Greg Ostertag in return.

Petrie doesn't seem all that concerned with the supposed baggage Wells brings to Sacramento.

"The story for Bonzi and for the Kings is what happens from this day forward," he told the Associated Press. "It's about how he plays, what he is, and the kind of contributions he can make. Whatever he has done in the past -- to the extent that he wants to discuss it or acknowledge it we are comfortable with it and very comfortable in talking to him. He's excited about coming here to play."

With a starting lineup consisting of Mike Bibby, Wells, Peja Stojakovic, Abdur-Rahim and Brad Miller, the Kings are a comparable team on paper to the one that would have existed had they never traded Webber and Christie midseason last year. Although they had to give up the valuable backup guard Jackson to get Wells, they also now have the depth of Corliss Williamson, Brian Skinner and Kenny Thomas in the frontcourt provided by the Webber exchange.

Petrie made that swap -- along with the Christie transaction -- because both of those players were at a point in their careers where their value on the court and on the player movement market wasn't going to get any higher. Soon after the changes, Webber's injury problems, defensive woes and inability to operate without the ball in his hands were highlighted in Philadelphia. Meanwhile, Christie sat out a large portion of the year in Orlando and was waived using the team's amnesty clause Monday.

By not taking on pricey, long-term salary obligations in trading away those players, Sacramento gained the cap flexibility to move in Abdur-Rahim.

"We’re very happy that it worked out the way it did," said Kings head coach Rick Adelman. "He’s a guy we wanted all along. I think Shareef is going to really help us. He gives us a proven scorer inside. He’s also a very good rebounder. He’s going to give us a threat around the basket that we need at this point with this team."

Rather than bringing in Wells, Petrie could have elected to pursue re-signing Cuttino Mobley, the 2-guard he got in return for Christie. As evidenced by Mobley's deal with the Clippers, however, that task would have commanded the type of long-term obligation that made Petrie want to move Webber, the Kings' franchise player, in the first place.

"We feel that Bonzi can come in and give us versatility at two positions," Petrie said. "He's the different type of player than we've had here before in terms of his overall skill level. And he is part of a process here where our backcourt has become much longer, quicker and more athletic."

And quickness is something Petrie knows a thing or two about. Just six months ago when his Kings traded their franchise player, it seemed as if the organization that had made so much progress since breaking out of its long stay in Lottery Land could have headed right back where it started.

Looking at the team today, you'd think the Kings never even skipped a beat.
 
Well written article, really makes it seem as if Petrie has been scheming this line-up since the day he traded Webber, which i dont put past good ole GP. This article just reaffirms for everybody else, that which every Kings fan knows:

GEOFF PETRIE IS A GOD :D
 
"We feel that Bonzi can come in and give us versatility at two positions," Petrie said. "He's the different type of player than we've had here before in terms of his overall skill level. And he is part of a process here where our backcourt has become much longer, quicker and more athletic."



Hmmm think that means less time for Corliss and more minutes for K Martin?

Or flexibility that if Peja had an Injury Bonzi could start as SF and Martin, Garcia ratchit up a notch.

I presume two positions means the SF slot as an alternative
 
K-Mart at SF a good amount? No way, unless it's for a spurt or two, or K-Mart is significantly heavier by the Fall.

Unrelated to the above statement, we'll have Corliss or someone else backing up Peja.
 
Chris Cobb said:
Well written article, really makes it seem as if Petrie has been scheming this line-up since the day he traded Webber, which i dont put past good ole GP. This article just reaffirms for everybody else, that which every Kings fan knows:

GEOFF PETRIE IS A GOD :D

A lesser diety perhaps - if he were a god we'd have Garnett after the Webber trade and Duncan for Christie and O-Tag with filler thrown in for salary-matching purposes. :D
 
kennadog said:
http://www.nba.com/features/moves_2005_sac.html

Geoff Petrie targets castoffs to revamp Sacramento

Western Gunslinger By Brad Friedman

Geoff Petrie doesn't rebuild the Kings. Sacramento's president of basketball operations simply reloads.

....

By not taking on pricey, long-term salary obligations in trading away those players, Sacramento gained the cap flexibility to move in Abdur-Rahim.

....


Uh WHAT?!??

Did I miss the chapter where the King's somehow managed to not get saddled with the overpriced, long term KT, Corlis and Skinner contracts?
 
mcsluggo said:
Uh WHAT?!??

Did I miss the chapter where the King's somehow managed to not get saddled with the overpriced, long term KT, Corlis and Skinner contracts?

I think he means in relation to the contracts traded away.

Mobley was 1 year and gone if he wanted too much (he did).

KT, Nasty and Skinner all have cheap contracts in comparison to Webber's.

And, we are still waiting to see if any of them are going to be moved this off-season.....
 
Kings113 said:
K-Mart at SF a good amount? No way, unless it's for a spurt or two, or K-Mart is significantly heavier by the Fall.

Unrelated to the above statement, we'll have Corliss or someone else backing up Peja.

No I meant that Corliss might get less minutes, Bonzi shifts some minutes
to SF, then Martin would get more minutes

Or if Bonzi started for an Injured Peja , then Martin and Garcia would get more min at SG

I agree that K-mart will not be in SF position at all
 
Ooh, alright. :)

Warhawk said:
I think he means in relation to the contracts traded away.

Mobley was 1 year and gone if he wanted too much (he did).

KT, Nasty and Skinner all have cheap contracts in comparison to Webber's.

And, we are still waiting to see if any of them are going to be moved this off-season.....

I gurantee at least one of them is. Yes.
 
Jkbiker said:
"We feel that Bonzi can come in and give us versatility at two positions," Petrie said. "He's the different type of player than we've had here before in terms of his overall skill level. And he is part of a process here where our backcourt has become much longer, quicker and more athletic."



Hmmm think that means less time for Corliss and more minutes for K Martin?

Or flexibility that if Peja had an Injury Bonzi could start as SF and Martin, Garcia ratchit up a notch.

I presume two positions means the SF slot as an alternative

Wells is big enough and tough enough to swing to the SF effectively for stretches, and that's really the way I think our bench is likely to go. The tweener forwards may rapidly run out of minutes because Bonzi is a lot like Jim Jackson and may eat up a lot of the backup SF minutes to give the kids time at OG. As always, Rick very much has a skill fetish and is much more likely to play a player "up" a position where he has a size disadvantage and a skill advantage, then he is to play guys "down" where they have a size/strength edge but lack skills.
 
Yeah, good article. And right on about Corliss, KT and Skinner being really good backups. Petrie is on record in the past about not caring about a players past only what they do for the Kings from here on out. So far it has worked. Lets see come preseason in October.
 
SAR replacement for Webber? Although I would agree that he's better than what we had, he is hardly in the same league as CWebb. I will support him because he's a King but I just have bad feeling about him. I really hope I'm wrong.
 
loopymitch said:
SAR replacement for Webber? Although I would agree that he's better than what we had, he is hardly in the same league as CWebb. I will support him because he's a King but I just have bad feeling about him. I really hope I'm wrong.

I think SAR will surprise you. And as far as being undersized well. Let's put it this way. Chris Webber is listed as 6' 10", Brian SKinner is listed at 6' 9". I was at the Return of Cwebb to Arco game last year. Brian Skinner was a little taller than CWebb. So we are at about the same size. Webber may have had a bit more weight, but he never used it to drive very often anyway.

SAR can bang down low. I just haven't really seen his pases very much since I don't know follow every single player in the league like some of you crazy people lol. But, I think he's going to feed pretty good. Only time will tell.

Now if we could only get Artest on the other side, I'd be streaking down the street.
 
kennadog said:
By not taking on pricey, long-term salary obligations in trading away those players, Sacramento gained the cap flexibility to move in Abdur-Rahim.

Yeah, it's a good thing we cleared the cap space to sign SAR, otherwise we would've had to use the MLE!

It kinda takes the warm fuzzies out of seeing a positive article about the Kings when the writer is so oblivious to basic facts.
~~
 
Well, they are sortof right. As it stands the team payroll is 61 million which is already over 10 million into the luxary tax (I read earlier in the summer that 49 million is the cutoff this year, but I may be wrong there) -- and that's with Doug's 8 million dollar contract off the books. If we still had Doug under contract, would management be willing to spend another 5 million on SAR? Would we have been able to take on Bonzi's 8 million dollar contract? Those trades did benefit the team's overall financial situation which does play a role in who management is willing to sign and for how much.
 
Last edited:
hrdboild said:
Well, they are sortof right. As it stands the team payroll is 61 million which is already over 10 million into the luxary tax (I read earlier in the summer that 49 million is the cutoff this year, but I may be wrong there) -- and that's with Doug's 8 million dollar contract off the books. If we still had Doug under contract, would management be willing to spend another 5 million on SAR? Would we have been able to take on Bonzi's 8 million dollar contract? Those trades did benefit the team's overall financial situation which does play a role in who management is willing to sign and for how much.

Actually, the tax starts a bit higher than that ($61.7 mil):

B. Tax



A team tax trigger will be set at 61% of BRI (the league-wide tax trigger for 2004-05 was 63.3%). The tax will be in effect each season, and will apply to any team with a payroll that exceeds the tax trigger. The tax trigger for each season will be established before the season based on a projection of BRI. For the 2005-06 season, the tax level is set at $61.7 million.

http://www.insidehoops.com/nba-collective-bargaining-agreement.shtml
 
Nice article!

I love the fact that Geoff Petrie had 2 players in mind this offseason, and he got them both. I would have thought one or the other but not both! Good job in getting your plan done Geoff!
 
Warhawk said:
Actually, the tax starts a bit higher than that ($61.7 mil):

B. Tax



A team tax trigger will be set at 61% of BRI (the league-wide tax trigger for 2004-05 was 63.3%). The tax will be in effect each season, and will apply to any team with a payroll that exceeds the tax trigger. The tax trigger for each season will be established before the season based on a projection of BRI. For the 2005-06 season, the tax level is set at $61.7 million.

http://www.insidehoops.com/nba-collective-bargaining-agreement.shtml



Just to add in the 49 number (or 49.5) is the salary cap, from what i read.
 
Chris Cobb said:
GEOFF PETRIE IS A GOD :D

GOD who had a angel watching over him. ;)

And without SAR we would very well have been headed to another first round exit. And we still have to see how far we can go. But its atleast going to be a good season.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top